UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.    )
Filed by the Registrant ☒
Filed by a party other than the Registrant ☐
Check the appropriate box:
Preliminary Proxy Statement
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
Definitive Proxy Statement
Definitive Additional Materials
Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12
micronlogo_bluea.jpg micron-logo-black-rgb-75x21.jpg
Micron Technology, Inc.
(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box)all boxes that apply):
No fee required
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
Fee computed on table belowin exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11
(1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:         
(2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:         
(3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
(4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:         
(5)Total fee paid:         
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1)Amount Previously Paid:         
(2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:         
(3)Filing Party:         
(4)Date Filed:         







fnc-000900xfinancialsxproxb.jpgLGL-1540100-Proxy-2023-Cover-Letter-PROXY-v04.jpg





company-profilexfinala.jpgmicron-corporate-profile-letter-english-workiva.jpg





shareholdersletter-final_pb.jpgLGL-1540100-Proxy-print-shareholder-letter-pg1-v06.jpg





shareholdersletter-final_pc.jpgLGL-1540100-Proxy-print-shareholder-letter-pg2-v06.jpg





micronnamea.jpgmicron-logo-black-rgb-75x21.jpg
Notice of Fiscal 20212023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders
January 13, 202218, 2024
To the Shareholders:


NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Fiscal 20212023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Micron Technology, Inc., a Delaware corporation, will be held virtually on January 13, 2022,18, 2024, at 9:00 a.m., Pacific Standard Time, for the purposes listed below. As used herein, “we,” “our,” “us,” “the Company,the “Company,” and similar terms refer to Micron Technology, Inc., unless the context indicates otherwise.


1.    To elect eight (8) directors to serve for the ensuing year and until their successors are elected and qualified;
2.    To approve, on a non-binding basis, the compensation of our Named Executive Officers;
3.    To approve, on a non-binding basis, the frequency (every one, two or three years) with which our shareholders will have an advisory vote on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers;
4.    To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firmindependent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending September 1, 2022;August 29, 2024;
5.    To vote on a shareholder proposal included in the accompanying proxy statement, if properly presented at the meeting; and
4.6.    To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.


The foregoing items of business are more fully described in the Proxy Statement accompanying this Notice.


Only shareholdersShareholders of record at the close of business on November 19, 202120, 2023 are entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the meeting and any postponements or adjournments of the meeting. A complete list of shareholders entitled to vote at the meeting will be openavailable for ten days prior to the examination of any shareholder, for any purpose germane to the business to be transactedmeeting at the meeting, for the ten-day period immediately preceding the date of the meeting, upon request to corporatesecretary@micron.com, including proof of stock ownership. The list will also be availableCompany’s headquarters and online during the meeting at by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MU2021MU2023.


The Securities and Exchange Commission permits proxy materials to be furnished over the Internet rather than in paper form. Accordingly, unless otherwise requested, we are sending our shareholders a notice (the “Notice”) regarding the availability of this Proxy Statement, our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2021,2023, and other proxy materials (together, the “proxy materials”) via the Internet (the “Notice”).Internet. This electronic process gives you fast, convenient access to the proxy materials, reduces the impact on the environment, and reduces our printing and mailing costs. If you received athe Notice by mail, you will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials in the mail. The Notice instructs you on how to access and review all of the important information contained in the Proxy Statement and Annual Report.proxy materials. The Notice also instructs you on how you may submit your vote over the Internet. If you received a Notice by mail and would like to receive a printed copy of our proxy materials by electronic mail or mail, you should follow the instructions for requesting such proxy materials included in the Notice.


Due to the continuing public health impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (“COVID-19”) pandemic and to support the health and well-being of our employees and shareholders, weWe are pleased to provide shareholders with the opportunity to participate in the annual meeting online via the Internet in a virtual-only meeting format to facilitate shareholder attendance and provide a consistent experience to all shareholders regardless of location. We will provide a live webcast of the annual meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MU2021MU2023, where you will also be able to submit questions and vote online. You will not be able to attend the meeting at a physical location.


To ensure your representation at the meeting, you are urged to vote, whether or not you attend the meeting. You may vote by telephone or electronically via the Internet.Internet by following the instructions on the Notice. Alternatively, if you received a paper copy, you may sign, date, and return the proxy card in the postage-prepaid envelope enclosed for that purpose. Please refer to the instructions included with the proxy card for additional details. Shareholders attending the meeting may vote using the virtual meeting platform even if they have already submitted their proxy, and any previous votes that were submitted by the shareholder, whether by Internet, telephone, or mail, will be superseded by the vote that such shareholder casts at the meeting.
By Order of the Board of Directors
Boise, Idaho
December 2, 2021November 29, 2023
Joel L. Poppen
Senior Mike Myers
Vice President, Legal Affairs,Interim General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. PLEASE SUBMIT YOUR PROXY PROMPTLY.



TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proxy SectionProxy SectionPageFrequently Requested InformationPageProxy SectionPageFrequently Requested InformationPage
Information Concerning Solicitation and VotingInformation Concerning Solicitation and VotingAuditor Fees
Proposal 1 – Election of DirectorsProposal 1 – Election of DirectorsBeneficial Ownership Table
Certain Relationships and Related TransactionsCertain Relationships and Related TransactionsBoard Diversity Matrix13
Director CompensationDirector CompensationBoard Leadership18
Executive Compensation and Related InformationExecutive Compensation and Related InformationCEO Pay Ratio
Proposal 2 – Say-on-PayProposal 2 – Say-on-PayCompensation Consultant34
Compensation Discussion and AnalysisCompensation Discussion and AnalysisDirector Biographies6
Compensation Committee ReportCompensation Committee ReportDirector Independence18
Summary Compensation TableSummary Compensation TableDirector Skills and Experience Matrix5
Grants of Plan-Based AwardsGrants of Plan-Based AwardsDirector Stock Ownership Guidelines23
Outstanding Equity AwardsOutstanding Equity AwardsDirector Tenure12
Option Exercises and Stock VestedOption Exercises and Stock VestedDiversity, Equality, and Inclusion14
Nonqualified Deferred CompensationNonqualified Deferred CompensationFinancial Performance
Chief Executive Officer Pay RatioChief Executive Officer Pay RatioHuman Capital and Culture14
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change In ControlPay-for-Performance33
Equity Compensation Plan InformationEquity Compensation Plan InformationPeer Group35
Perquisites
Audit Committee MattersAudit Committee MattersPerks
Proposal 3 – Ratification of Appointment of PwCRelated Party Transactions
Principal ShareholdersPrincipal ShareholdersSustainability15
Notice of Electronic Availability of Proxy MaterialsNotice of Electronic Availability of Proxy Materials
Incorporation by Reference of Certain Financial InformationIncorporation by Reference of Certain Financial Information
Householding of Proxy Statements and Annual ReportsHouseholding of Proxy Statements and Annual Reports
Cautionary Note on Forward-Looking StatementsCautionary Note on Forward-Looking Statements
Deadline for Receipt of Shareholder ProposalsDeadline for Receipt of Shareholder Proposals






Table of Contents
micronnamea.jpgmicron-logo-black-rgb-75x21.jpg
PROXY STATEMENT
FISCAL 20212023 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS


January 13, 202218, 2024
9:00 a.m. Pacific Standard Time
____________________________


INFORMATION CONCERNING SOLICITATION AND VOTING


General


This proxy statement (the “Proxy Statement”) is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies on behalf of the Board of Directors of Micron Technology, Inc. (the “Board”), for use at the Fiscal 20212023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on January 13, 2022,18, 2024, at 9:00 a.m., Pacific Standard Time, or at any adjournment or postponement thereof (the “Annual Meeting”). The purpose of the Annual Meeting is set forth herein and in the accompanying Notice of Fiscal 20212023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The Annual Meeting will be held via a live webcast, and there will not be a physical meeting location. You will be able to attend the annual meeting online and to vote your shares electronically on the virtual meeting platform by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MU2021MU2023 and entering the 16-digit control number included in our Notice, on your proxy card, or in the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials.

Shareholders will be able to submit questions before the Annual Meeting through www.proxyvote.com or during the annual meetingAnnual Meeting using the virtual meeting platform. Relevant questions submitted before or during the annual meetingAnnual Meeting will be addressed after the annual meetingAnnual Meeting in the Investor Relations section of our website at www.micron.com.


We encourage you to access the Annual Meeting before it begins. Online check-in will start approximately 15 minutes before the Annual Meeting. If you have difficulty accessing the meeting or other technical or logistical issues, please call the technical support number that will be posted on the virtual Annual Meeting login page. We will have technicians available to assist you.

ThisThe Notice, this Proxy Statement, and related proxy card are first being distributedmade available on or about December 2, 2021,November 29, 2023, to all shareholders entitled to vote at the meeting.


Shareholders can vote their shares using one of the following methods:


Vote through the Internet at www.proxyvote.com, using the instructions included in the notice regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials, the proxy card, or voting instruction card;


Vote by telephone using the instructions on the proxy card or voting instruction card if you received a paper copy of the proxy materials;


Complete and return a written proxy or voting instruction card using the proxy card or voting instruction card if you received a paper copy of the proxy materials; or


Attend the meeting and vote electronically on the virtual meeting platform.


Internet and telephone voting are available 24 hours a day, and if you use one of those methods, you do not need to return a paper proxy or voting instruction card. Unless you are planning to vote at the meeting,Annual Meeting, your vote must be received by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Standard Time, on January 12, 2022.17, 2024.


micronnamea.jpgmicron-logo-black-rgb-75x21.jpg1


Table of Contents
Record Date


Shareholders of record at the close of business on November 19, 202120, 2023 (the “Record Date”) are entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the meeting.


Revocability of Proxy


Any proxy given pursuant to this solicitation may be revoked by the person giving it at any time before its use by attending the Annual Meeting and voting online or by delivering to us a written notice of revocation at Micron Technology, Inc., Attn.: Corporate Secretary, 8000 South Federal Way, Boise, Idaho 83716-963283716 or corporatesecretary@micron.com or another duly executed proxy bearing a date later than the earlier given proxy but prior to the date of the Annual Meeting.


Solicitation


The Board of Directors is soliciting proxies for use at the Annual Meeting. We will bear the cost of solicitation. In addition, we may reimburse brokerage firms and other persons representing beneficial owners of shares for their expenses in forwarding solicitation materials to such beneficial owners. Proxies may be solicited by our directors, officers, and employees, without additional compensation, personally or by telephone or Internet. We intend to usehave engaged the services of D.F. King & Co., a proxy solicitation firm, in connection with the solicitation of proxies. Although the exact cost of the solicitation services is not known at this time, it is anticipated that the fees paid by us for these services will be approximately $12,500.


Outstanding Shares


We have one class of stock outstanding, common stock, $0.10 par value per share (the “Common Stock”). As of the Record Date, 1,120,169,7491,103,733,774 shares of Common Stock were issued and outstanding and entitled to vote.


Voting Rights and Required Vote


Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, our Restated Certificate of Incorporation, and our Amended and Restated Bylaws (“Bylaws”), each shareholder will be entitled to one vote for each share of Common Stock held at the Record Date for all matters. The required quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting is a majority in voting power of shares of our Common Stock issued and outstanding on the Record Date and entitled to vote thereat, present in person or represented by proxy. Shares that are voted “FOR,” “AGAINST,” or “ABSTAIN” are treated as being present at the Annual Meeting for the purposes of establishing a quorum. Broker non-votes will also be considered present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum for the transaction of business, but such non-votes will not be included in the tabulation of the voting results with respect to voting results for the election of directors and other non-routine matters.business.


Shares held in a brokerage account or by another nominee are considered held in “street name” by the shareholder or “beneficial owner.” A broker or nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner maydoes not have discretion to vote on non-routine matters, such as matters relating to the election of directors or other non-routine mattersand Proposals 2, 3 and 5 unless the broker or nominee receives specific voting instructions from the beneficial owner of the shares. As a result, absent specificA broker “non-vote” occurs when the broker or nominee does not receive voting instructions brokers or nominees mayfrom the beneficial owner and does not vote a beneficial owner’s shares on Proposals 1 and 2 and such shares will be considered “broker non-votes” for such proposals. Brokers or nominees may vote a beneficial owner’s shares on Proposal 3.have discretion to direct the voting of the shares.


Directors will be elected if the number of votes cast “FOR” a particular director exceeds the number of votes cast “AGAINST” that same director, with abstentions and broker-non votes not counted as a vote cast “FOR” or “AGAINST” that director’s election. With respect to all other items of business to be considered at the meeting, the “FOR” vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of the shares of Common Stock attending online in person or represented by proxy is required in order for such matter to be considered approved by the shareholders. For such non-routine matters,proposals, abstentions will have the same effect as voting against such items of business, but broker non-votes will not be counted in the tabulation of results. For routine matters, abstentions and broker non-votes, if any, will have no effect on the same effect asoutcome of the proposal. On the proposal to approve, on an advisory basis, the frequency of holding future advisory votes on the compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers, the voting against such itemsoption that receives the greatest number of business.votes, even if that option is not
2 |20212023 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

approved by the holders of a majority of the voting power of the shares of Common Stock attending online in person or represented by proxy, will be considered the frequency preferred by shareholders.

Voting of Proxies


The shares of Common Stock represented by all properly executed proxies received by 11:59 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, on January 12, 202217, 2024 will be voted in accordance with the directions given by the shareholders. If no instructions are given with respect to a properly executed proxy timely received by us, the shares of Common Stock represented thereby will be voted (i) FOR each of the nominees named herein as directors, or their respective substitutes as may be appointed by the Board, of Directors, (ii) FOR a non-binding resolution to approve the compensation of our Named Executive Officers as described in this Proxy Statement, (iii) Every “ONE YEAR” on the non-binding vote on the frequency of an advisory vote to approve the compensation of our Named Executive Officers, (iv) FOR ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firmindependent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending September 1, 2022,August 29, 2024, (v) AGAINST the shareholder proposal and (iv)(vi) in the discretion of the proxy holders for such other business which may properly come before the Annual Meeting.




micronnamea.jpgmicron-logo-black-rgb-75x21.jpg3


Table of Contents
PROPOSAL 1 - ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
All directors elected annually by a simple majority of votes cast
Independent Board Chair
Seven of eight director nominees are independent

BOARD RECOMMENDATION


Our Board of Directors is presenting eight (8) nominees for election as directors at the Annual Meeting. Each of the nominees is currently a member of our Board and other than Ms. Haynesworth (who joined our Board in February 2021), was elected to our Board at the Fiscal 20202022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Each director elected at the Annual Meeting will serve until our Fiscal 20222024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and until a successor is duly elected and qualified.qualified, except in the case of death, resignation or removal of such director. Each of the nominees has consented to be named in this Proxy Statement and to serve as a director if elected. If any nominee is unable or unwilling for good cause to stand for election or serve as a director if elected, the persons named as proxies may vote for a substitute nominee designated by our existing Board, of Directors, or our Board may choose to reduce its size.


VOTE REQUIRED FOR APPROVALBOARD RECOMMENDATION


The Board recommends voting “FOR” the election of each of the nominees.

VOTE REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL

Each director nominee will be elected as a director if such nominee receives the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast with respect to his or her election (in other words, the number of shares voted “FOR” a director must exceed the number of votes cast “AGAINST” that director). Shareholders are not permitted to cumulate votes with respect to the election of directors.


If a nominee who is serving as a director is not elected at the Annual Meeting by the requisite majority of votes cast, Delaware law provides that the director would continue to serve on our Board of Directors as a holdover director. However, under our Bylaws, any incumbent director who fails to be elected must offer to tender his or her resignation to our Board.Board following the procedures established by the Governance and Sustainability Committee. The Governance and Sustainability Committee will then make a recommendation to our Board on whether to accept or reject the resignation or whether other action should be taken. Our Board will act on the resignation, taking into account the Governance and Sustainability Committee’s recommendation, and publicly disclose its decision and the rationale behind it within 90 days from the date the election results are certified. Any director who offers to tender his or her resignation will not participate in the Board’s or the Governance and Sustainability Committee’s decision.


4 |20212023 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents
SUMMARY OF SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE OF DIRECTOR NOMINEES


The following table highlights the specific skills, experience, qualifications and attributes that each of the director nominees brings to the Board. A particular director nominee may possess other skills, experience, qualifications or attributes even though they are not indicated below.


Skills and ExperienceRichard M. BeyerLynn A. DugleSteven J. GomoLinnie M. HaynesworthMary Pat McCarthySanjay MehrotraRobert E. SwitzMaryAnn Wright
Independence
Multinational experience
Executive leadership (public or private)
Research and development
Technology industry
Corporate strategy
Corporate development
Corporate governance
Research and developmentOperations
Technology industryMarketing
Corporate strategy
Corporate development
Corporate governance
Operations
Marketing
Cybersecurity
Other public board service
Finance
Auditing / accounting
Auditing / accounting




micronnamea.jpgmicron-logo-black-rgb-75x21.jpg5


Table of Contents
Nominees For Election
Board of Directors

Beyer.jpg

Richard M.
Beyer
 
Independent
Professional Experience
-Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. from 2008 through June 2012; director from 2008 to 2013.
-Prior to Freescale, Mr. Beyer was President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of Intersil Corporation from 2002 to 2008.
-Mr. Beyer previously served in executive management roles at FVC.com, VLSI Technology, and National Semiconductor Corporation, and served three years as an officer in the United States Marine Corps.
--
Within the past five years, Mr. Beyer served on the Board of Directors of Dialog
Semiconductor, Microsemi Corporation, and Analog Devices, Inc.
Semiconductor.
Other Current Public Company Directorships
--None
Board Skills, Qualifications, and Expertise
Mr. Beyer’s experience as the Chief Executive Officerchief executive officer and a director at leading technology companies provides our Board expertise in the technology industry and also in corporate strategy, financial management, operations, marketing, and research and development, all of which are critical to achieving our strategic objectives. We believe these experiences, qualifications, attributes, and skills qualify Mr. Beyer to serve as a member of our Board of Directors.Board.
Age 7375 | Director Since 2013 | Committees Compensation (Chair), Governance and Sustainability, Security

Dugle.jpg

Lynn A. Dugle
 
Independent
Professional Experience
-Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, and President of Engility Holdings Inc., an NYSE-listed engineering services firm, from March 2016 to January 2019.
-Prior to Engility, Ms. Dugle was Corporate Vice President, President of Intelligence and Information Systems of Raytheon Company from January 2009 to March 2015.
--Within the past five years, Ms. Dugle served on the Board of Directors of State Street Corporation.
Other Current Public Company Directorships
--First Light Acquisition Group,EOG Resources, Inc. (advisor partner)
-KBR, Inc.
-TE Connectivity Ltd.
-KBR, Inc.
Board Skills, Qualifications, and Expertise
Ms. Dugle’s experience as chairman and chief executive officer of a public engineering services firm and senior officer of a leading public technology company provides our Board expertise in information, technology, cybersecurity, corporate strategy, operations, and research and development, all of which are critical to achieving our strategic objectives. We believe these experiences, qualifications, attributes, and skills qualify Ms. Dugle to serve as a member of our Board of Directors.Board.
Age6264|Director Since2020|CommitteesAudit, Security (Chair)
6 |20212023 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents
Board of Directors


Gomo.jpg

Steven J.
Gomo
 
Independent
Professional Experience
-Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer from October 2004 until his retirement in December 2011, and Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer from August 2002 to September 2004 at NetApp, Inc., a storage and data management company.
Other Current Public Company Directorships
--Nutanix, Inc.
-Enphase Energy, Inc.
Board Skills, Qualifications, and Expertise
Mr. Gomo’s experience as the chief financial officer of a public technology company provides our Board expertise in the technology industry, particularly in the areas of finance, accounting, treasury, investor relations, and securities, which contribute valuable insights and perspectives to our business and operations. We believe these experiences, qualifications, attributes, and skills qualify Mr. Gomo to serve as a member of our Board of Directors.Board.
Age 6971 | Director Since 2018 | Committees Audit, Finance (Chair), Finance



Haynesworth.jpg

Linnie M. Haynesworth
 
Independent
Professional Experience
-Sector Vice President, Cyber and Intelligence Mission Solutions Division from January 2016 to 2019, and Sector Vice President and General Manager from December 2013 to 2019 at Northrop Grumman, a defense and space company.
Other Current Public Company Directorships
-Truist Financial Corporation
--Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
-Eastman Chemical Company
Board Skills, Qualifications, and Expertise
Ms. Haynesworth’s experience as the sector vice president and general manager of a public defense and space company provides our Board expertise in technology integration, cybersecurity (including a Certificate in Cybersecurity Oversight), enterprise strategy, risk management, and large complex system development, delivery, and deployment, and contributes valuable insights and perspectives to our business and operations. Additionally, Ms. Haynesworth became a Member of the Defense Business Board of the United States Department of Defense in November 2021. We believe these experiences, qualifications, attributes, and skills qualify Ms. Haynesworth to serve as a member of our Board of Directors.Board.
Age 6466 | Director Since 2021 | Committees Governance and Sustainability, Security


micronnamea.jpgmicron-logo-black-rgb-75x21.jpg7


Table of Contents
Board of Directors

McCarthy.jpg

Mary Pat
McCarthy
 
Independent
Professional Experience
-Vice Chair of KPMG LLP, the U.S. member firm of the global audit, tax, and advisory services firm, from July 1998 until her retirement in December 2011. Ms. McCarthy joined KMPG in 1977, became a partner in 1987, and held numerous senior leadership positions with the firm during her tenure.
-Within the past five years, Ms. McCarthy served on the Board of Directors of Andeavor Corporation and Mutual of Omaha.
Other Current Public Company Directorships
-Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
Board Skills, Qualifications, and Expertise
Ms. McCarthy’s experience advising numerous companies on financial and accounting matters as a Certified Public Accountant (ret.) provides our Board deep technical expertise in financial and accounting matters, and contributes valuable insights and perspectives to our business and operations. We believe these experiences, qualifications, attributes, and skills qualify Ms. McCarthy to serve as a member of our Board of Directors.Board.
Age 6668 | Director Since 2018 | Committees Audit (Chair), Finance (Chair)



Mehrotra.jpg

Sanjay
Mehrotra
 
Chief Executive
Officer
Professional Experience
-Mr. Mehrotra has served as Micron’s President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director since May 2017.
-Prior to that, Mr. Mehrotra co-founded and led SanDisk Corporation as a start-up in 1988 until its eventual sale in May 2016, serving as its President and Chief Executive Officer from January 2011 to May 2016 and as a member of its Board of Directors from July 2010 to May 2016.
-Within the past five years, Mr. Mehrotra served on the Board of Directors of Cavium, Inc. and Western Digital Corp.
Other Current Public Company Directorships
-CDW Corporation
Board Skills, Qualifications, and Expertise
Mr. Mehrotra has 4142 years of experience in the semiconductor memory industry, and as a co-founder of SanDisk, he offers a unique perspective on the industry and has significant senior leadership and technological expertise. In addition, Mr. Mehrotra’s experience provides our Board expertise in finance, corporate development, corporate governance, and business strategy, all of which are critical to achieving our strategic objectives. We believe these experiences, qualifications, attributes, and skills qualify Mr. Mehrotra to serve as a member of our Board of Directors.Board.
Age 6365 | Director Since 2017 | Committee Finance
8 |20212023 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Board of Directors

Switz.jpg

Robert E.
Switz
 
Independent,
Chair of the
Board
Professional Experience
-President and Chief Executive Officer of ADC Telecommunications, Inc., a supplier of network infrastructure products and services, from August 2003 until December 2010 and Chairman from 2008 until December 2010, when Tyco Electronics Ltd. acquired ADC. Mr. Switz joined ADC in 1994 and throughout his career there held numerous leadership positions.
-Within the past five years, Mr. Switz served on the Board of Directors of Gigamon, Inc., and Mandiant, Inc.
Other Current Public Company Directorships
-Marvell Technology Group Ltd.
-FireEye, Inc.
Board Skills, Qualifications, and Expertise
Appointed Chair of Micron’s Board of Directors in 2012, Mr. Switz’s experience as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of a leading technology company and history and leadership on Micron’s Board provide the Board expertise in the technology industry as well as international business operations, finance, corporate development, corporate governance, and management, all of which are critical to achieving our strategic objectives. We believe these experiences, qualifications, attributes, and skills qualify Mr. Switz to serve as a member of our Board of Directors.Board.
Age 7577 | Director Since 2006 | Committees Compensation, Governance and Sustainability


micronnamea.jpgmicron-logo-black-rgb-75x21.jpg9


Table of Contents

Board of Directors

Wright.jpg

MaryAnn
Wright
 
Independent
Professional Experience
-Group Vice President of Engineering and Product Development of Johnson Controls International (“JCI”) from 2013 to 2017. Ms. Wright also served as Vice President and General Manager for Johnson Controls’ Hybrid Systems business and as CEO of Johnson Controls-Saft from 2007 to 2009.
-Prior to joining JCI, Ms. Wright served in the Office of the Chair and was EVP Engineering, Sales and Program Management at Collins & Aikman from 2006 to 2007.
-Prior to that, Ms. Wright held several executive positions at Ford Motor Company, including Chief Engineer, from 2003 to 2005, and Director of Sustainable Mobility Technologies and Hybrid and Fuel Cell Vehicle Programs from 2004 to 2005.
-Within the past five years, Ms. Wright served on the Board of Directors of Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. and Delphi Technologies.
Other Current Public Company Directorships
-Group 1 Automotive, Inc.
-Brunswick Corporation
-Solid Power, Inc.
Board Skills, Qualifications, and Expertise
Ms. Wright’s extensive experience in, and knowledge of, the automotive industry (OEM and Tier 1 supplier), public board experience and her expertise in vehicle, advance powertrain, and energy storage system technologies, provide our Board expertise in the technology industry as well as business operations, finance, corporate development, corporate governance, and management, all of which are critical to achieving our strategic objectives. We believe these experiences, qualifications, attributes, and skills qualify Ms. Wright to serve as a member of our Board of Directors.Board.
Age 5961 | Director Since 2019 | Committees Compensation, Governance and Sustainability (Chair)


There are no family relationships between any of our directors or executive officers.


The Board of Directors recommends voting FOR“FOR” approval of the nominees listed above.
10 |20212023 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents
Director Nominations and Board Refreshment and Diversity


Nomination Process


The Governance and Sustainability Committee regularly reviews the appropriate size and composition of the Board, including by anticipating vacancies and required expertise for the effective oversight of the Company. In evaluating the existing Board and any desired characteristics of potential nominees, the Governance and Sustainability Committee considers, among other things, the knowledge, experience, integrity, and judgment of the candidates, their contribution to the diversity of backgrounds, experience and skills on the Board, and their ability to devote sufficient time and effort to their duties as directors.directors and provide appropriate oversight. The Governance and Sustainability Committee considers the following skills and experience particularly relevant: experience in the semiconductor industry or related industries; strong business acumen and judgment; excellent interpersonal skills; business relationships with key individuals in industry, government, and education that may be of significant assistance to us and our operations; familiarity with accounting rules and practices; and “independence” as defined and required by the Listing Rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (“Nasdaq”) and relevant rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The Governance and Sustainability Committee then recommends the bestselected candidates to the Board.


When the Board of Directors decides to add directors to the Board, the Governance and Sustainability Committee worksmay work with a third party executive search firm to assist them in identifying and evaluating potential candidates.


Although the Governance and Sustainability Committee has not established specific diversity guidelines, the Board seeks to maintain a balance of perspectives, qualities, and skills on the Board to obtain a diversity of viewpoints to better understand the technical, economic, political, and social environments in which we operate and to enhance Micron’s performance. Accordingly, the Governance and Sustainability Committee takes into account the personal characteristics, experience, and skills of current and prospective directors, including gender, race, and ethnicity, to ensure that our Board comprises a broad range of perspectives, and measures success by, among other things, the range of viewpoints represented on the Board.


Shareholder RecommendationsNomination and Recommendation of Director Candidates


Advance Notice Procedures

Our Bylaws permit shareholders to nominate directors at an annual meeting of shareholders or at a special meeting at which directors are to be elected. A shareholder may recommendnominate a director candidate to the Governance and Sustainability Committee by delivering a written notice to our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive officesoffices. Such notice must comply with the timing and includingdisclosure requirements set forth in our Bylaws. A nomination will not be included in our proxy materials unless submitted in compliance with the followingproxy access process described below. A copy of our Bylaws can be found on the Corporate Governance page of our website at www.micron.com and is available in print without charge upon request to corporatesecretary@micron.com.

Proxy Access

Our Bylaws also permit a shareholder or a group of up to 20 shareholders owning continuously for at least three years shares representing in the notice: the name and addressaggregate at least 3% of the total voting power of the Company’s outstanding Common Stock (collectively, an “eligible shareholder”) to nominate and include shareholder-nominated director candidates in our proxy materials for annual meetings of shareholders. An eligible shareholder as they appear on our booksmeeting the specified eligibility requirements set forth in the Bylaws is generally permitted to nominate the greater of (i) two director nominees or other proof(ii) 20% of share ownership; the number of sharesdirectors in office. Use of the proxy access process to submit shareholder nominees is subject to additional eligibility, procedural, and disclosure requirements set forth in Article II, Section 11 of our Common Stock beneficially owned by the shareholder as of the date the shareholder gives written notice; a description of all arrangements or understandings between the shareholder and the director candidate and any other person(s) pursuant to which the recommendation or nomination is to be made by the shareholder; the name, age, business address, and residence address of the director candidate and a description of the director candidate’s business experience for at least the previous five years; the principal occupation or employment of the director candidate; the number of sharesBylaws. A copy of our Common Stock beneficially owned byBylaws can be found on the director candidate; the consent of the director candidate to serve as a memberCorporate Governance page of our Boardwebsite at www.micron.com and is available in print without charge upon request to corporatesecretary@micron.com.

micron-logo-black-rgb-75x21.jpg11

Table of Directors if appointed or elected; and any other information required to be disclosed with respect to a director nominee in solicitationsContents
Recommendations

Shareholders may also recommend candidates for proxies for the election of directors pursuant toconsideration by our Bylaws and the applicable rules of the SEC.

The Governance and Sustainability Committee may require additional information as it deems reasonably required to determine the eligibility of the director candidate to serve as a member of our Board of Directors.Committee. Shareholders recommending candidates for consideration by our Board in connection with the next annual meeting of shareholdersGovernance and Sustainability Committee should submit their written recommendation no later than one hundred twenty (120) calendar days in advance of the date of our Proxy Statementproxy statement released in connection with the previous year's annual meeting of shareholders.

The Governance and Sustainability Committee will evaluate director candidates recommended by shareholders for election to our Board in the same manner and using the same criteria as it uses for any other director candidate. If the Governance and Sustainability Committee determines that a shareholder-recommended candidate is suitable for membership on our Board, of Directors, it will include the
micronnamea.jpg11


candidate in the pool of candidates to be considered for nomination upon the occurrence of the next vacancy on our Board or in connection with the next annual meeting of shareholders.


Proxy Access

Our Bylaws permit up to 20 shareholders owning continuously for at least three years shares representing in the aggregate at least 3% of the total voting power of the Company’s outstanding common stock to nominate and include shareholder-nominated director candidates in our proxy materials for annual meetings of shareholders. A shareholder, or group of not more than 20 shareholders (collectively, an “eligible shareholder”), meeting specified eligibility requirements is generally permitted to nominate the greater of (i) two director nominees or (ii) 20% of the number of directors on our Board. Use of the proxy access process to submit shareholder nominees is subject to additional eligibility, procedural, and disclosure requirements set forth in Article II, Section 11 of our Bylaws. A copy of our Bylaws can be found on the Corporate Governance page of our website at www.micron.com and is available in print without charge upon request to corporatesecretary@micron.com.

Other Director Nominations

Shareholders who wish to nominate a person for election as a director in connection with an annual meeting of shareholders (as opposed to making a recommendation to the Governance and Sustainability Committee as described above) and who do not intend for the nomination to be included in our proxy materials pursuant to the proxy access process described above must comply with the advance notice requirement set forth in Article II, Section 11 of our Bylaws.

Board Refreshment and Diversity


The Board believes that periodic Board refreshment can provide new experiences and fresh perspectives to our Board and is most effective if it is sufficiently balanced to maintain continuity among Board members that will allow for the sharing of historical perspectives and experiences relevant to the Company. Our Board seeks to achieve this balance through its director succession planning process, as well as in response to the annual Board and individual director assessment process discussed below.

In February 2021, our Board appointed Ms. Linnie Haynesworth as a director. Ms. Haynesworth brings valuable insights and experience to our Board, including extensive experience in and knowledge of technology integration, cybersecurity, enterprise strategy, risk management, and large complex system development, delivery, and deployment. With the appointments of Ms. Haynesworth in 2021, Ms. Dugle in 2020, Ms. Wright in 2019, and Ms. McCarthy and Mr. Gomo in 2018, our Board refreshed its composition while maintaining institutional knowledge with directors of varying lengths of tenure.

12 |2021 Proxy Statement



The Governance and Sustainability Committee is committed to continuing to identify and recruit highly qualified director candidates with diverse experiences, perspectives, and backgrounds to join our Board. The table below provides certain information regarding the composition of our Board. Each of the categories listed in the table below table has the meaning as it is used in Nasdaq Rule 5605(f) and related instructions.


Board Diversity Matrix (as of September 2, 2021)
Board Diversity Matrix
(as of September 1, 2022 and August 31, 2023)
Board Diversity Matrix
(as of September 1, 2022 and August 31, 2023)
Total Number of DirectorsTotal Number of Directors8Total Number of Directors8
FemaleMaleNon-BinaryDid Not Disclose GenderFemaleMaleNon-BinaryDid Not Disclose Gender
Part I: Gender IdentityPart I: Gender IdentityPart I: Gender Identity
DirectorsDirectors4-Directors4-
Part II: Demographic BackgroundPart II: Demographic BackgroundPart II: Demographic Background
African American or BlackAfrican American or Black1-African American or Black1-
Alaskan Native or Native AmericanAlaskan Native or Native American-Alaskan Native or Native American-
AsianAsian-1-Asian-1-
Hispanic or LatinxHispanic or Latinx-Hispanic or Latinx-
Native Hawaiian or Pacific IslanderNative Hawaiian or Pacific Islander-Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander-
WhiteWhite3-White3-
Two or More Races or EthnicitiesTwo or More Races or Ethnicities-Two or More Races or Ethnicities-
LGBTQ+LGBTQ+-LGBTQ+-
Did Not Disclose Demographic BackgroundDid Not Disclose Demographic Background-Did Not Disclose Demographic Background-
Additional Diversity CharacteristicsAdditional Diversity Characteristics
Military VeteranMilitary Veteran-1-

12 |2023 Proxy Statement

In addition, one
Table of our directors is a veteran of the U.S. military.Contents

The Board’s Role and Responsibilities


Shareholder EngagementOutreach


We are committed to engagingOur relationship with our shareholders plays an important part in our long-term success. Our shareholders have regularly shared their insights and soliciting their viewsperspectives with us over the years through our investor relations program, which involves one-on-one meetings and inputconferences and roadshows, among other engagements. At the 2022 annual meeting of shareholders, our annual shareholder advisory vote on important matters,Named Executive Officer compensation, commonly referred to as the “say-on-pay vote,” received the support of 71% of the votes cast. We were unsatisfied with this level of support. Accordingly, we developed an expanded, integrated shareholder engagement effort that included outreach to our shareholders’ investor stewardship and governance teams to understand the concerns that drove shareholders’ say-on-pay voting decisions, as well as any other feedback on areas of interest from shareholders, including performance, executive compensation, governance, and environmental, social and governance matters.
Page 13.jpg
Our discussions with shareholders included senior members of our legal, human resources, sustainability and investor relations teams. Meetings with 26% of our outstanding shares included our independent Chairman of the Board. Our conversations covered executive compensation, sustainability and human capital management.

Our directors periodically engage directlymatters, and our governance and political practices, with a particular focus on compensation to well-position us to evolve our programs and practices in a responsive manner. We heard from shareholders that they appreciated the engagement, and suggested that we enhance our disclosure to describe our shareholder engagement efforts. We value the views of our shareholders, which were shared with our shareholders by participatingfull Board and relevant committees and carefully considered in shareholder outreach.

Members of our management team, together with our investor relations, sustainability and legal teams, maintain an active dialogue with shareholders throughout the year to obtain their input on key matters, and keep our management and Board informed about the issues that matter mostmaking changes to our shareholders.

The Compensation Committeefiscal 2024 compensation program. Below is a summary of the feedback we received through these engagement efforts and Governance and Sustainability Committee routinely review our executive compensation design and governance practices and policies, with an eye towards continual improvement and enhancements. Our investor relations team updates the Board concerning shareholder input on these issues, allowing the Board and its committees to take shareholder input into account when setting pay and governance practices.

In fiscal 2021, our discussions with investors covered a variety of topics, including our response to COVID-19, environmental and social topics including diversity issues and our efforts to support social justice as well as our environmental goals, enhanced disclosures in our 2021 Sustainability Report that included investor-orientedhow we have responded.
micronnamea.jpgmicron-logo-black-rgb-75x21.jpg13

Sustainability Accounting Standards Board disclosures, Board composition and refreshment efforts (including the recent additions to our Board), and executive compensation.

What We HeardOur Perspective/How We Responded
Executive Compensation
Increase the weighting of PRSUs awarded to the CEO to at least 60% of equity award valueWe increased the weighting of total equity value allocated to PRSUs in the equity mix from 50% to 65% for our CEO.
Adopt a cap on rTSR PRSU payouts in the event of negative absolute TSR performanceTo further align rTSR PRSU awards with shareholders’ experience, we modified 2024 fiscal year awards to cap payouts at target if the Company’s absolute TSR is negative, even if the Company’s rTSR performance exceeds target.
Increase the rigor of the rTSR PRSU target at median performanceWe increased the rTSR PRSUs performance level required to earn target payout from the 50th to 55th percentile of the SOX index to require outperformance at target and revised the payout curve for these awards to double the outperformance required relative to peers to achieve maximum payout from +25pp to +50pp.
Provide the Compensation Committee’s rationale regarding the performance periods used for PRSU awardsA minority of investors we spoke with expressed their preference that performance-based, long-term incentives utilize a performance period of three years, and encouraged us to explain the Compensation Committee’s rationale for our current PRSU performance periods, which measure performance in years two and three of the performance period (see “Performance-based RSUs Granted in Fiscal 2023” for full details regarding our 2023 PRSU awards). Given the extreme cyclicality of the memory industry (which is significantly different than that experienced by other companies in our peer group) and the challenges related to precisely forecasting market cycles over long time horizons, the Compensation Committee believes that its current approach to assessing performance enables us to set aggressive goals tied to longer-term performance while still enabling the flexibility needed to address the distorting effects that industry cyclicality presents in any given year. A single observation point at the end of three years can misrepresent the actual progress made by the Company towards its strategic goals, due to the unpredictable effects of cyclicality, and two observation points, at the end of year 2 and year 3 can provide a better representation of the trajectory of the Company performance. After careful consideration, these factors led the Compensation Committee to maintain our existing approach to performance periods for our 2024 PRSU awards.
Proxy Statement Disclosure Enhancements
Add disclosure addressing compensation metric selection rationale, targets and actual achievement to the extent possible without resulting in “competitive harm”
We have provided detailed information regarding the changes being made for fiscal year 2024 that further enhance the rigor of our program, and have committed to disclose the profitability goals used under our fiscal 2024 annual incentive awards and actual results against those goals following completion of the performance period.

We have significantly enhanced disclosures regarding our rationale for the metrics used in our program, targets set and results achieved, except where such disclosure is likely to cause us “competitive harm,” in which case we have clearly indicated our competitive harm concerns.
Enhance disclosure of environmental and social compensation metrics usedWe have provided additional details regarding our compensation goals focused on environmental sustainability and diversity, equality, and inclusion metrics and milestones.

14 |2023 Proxy Statement

Environmental Sustainability, Human Capital, and Political Spending
Shareholders were generally complimentary of our 2023 sustainability report and the progress of our efforts to date, and encouraged us to consider additional disclosure regarding efforts related to water stewardship, supply chain due diligence, greenhouse gas emissions and energy usage in our next sustainability reportWe appreciate hearing shareholders’ areas of focus as we look ahead. The aim of our 2023 sustainability report and sustainability progress summary was to provide a detailed accounting of our progress toward achievement of our sustainability goals and to recount our specific contributions over the past year. The report also shared our vision for sustainable development in the years ahead. With each report we will continue to consider the additional information that our stakeholders need and request regarding our efforts, taking into consideration feedback we receive from shareholders as we continue to develop our programs.
With respect to human capital, consider high level disclosure of diversity targets, continue successful pay equity practices, and use caution when employing artificial intelligence in the recruiting processThrough our membership in the Alliance for Global Inclusion, we are working toward a unified set of diversity and inclusion goals and metrics and the appropriate level of public disclosure. We continue to achieve pay equity and use artificial intelligence to identify, analyze, and address any disparities in pay, as well as to eliminate the potential for bias in our hiring practices. As artificial intelligence develops, we are mindful of the risks and exercise caution in our implementation of artificial intelligence technologies.
Increase disclosure of Board oversight of political and lobbying expendituresWe have added disclosure in this Proxy Statement of the Governance and Sustainability’s responsibility in overseeing and monitoring the manner in which the Company conducts its public policy and government affairs.

Human Capital and Culture


We believe our people are our most important resource and a critical driver of our competitive advantage. We also believe thatCentral to our bestcontinuous innovation springs from our team members’ diverse experiences, perspectives,is an ingrained culture of inclusion, well-being, and backgrounds.continuous learning. Our Board considers the creation and maintenance of a diverse and inclusive environment to be a crucial element of the Company’s business strategy, including effectively addressing customer, shareholder, and other stakeholder needs, and believes each Micron hire is an opportunity to enhance the competencies, skills, talent, experience, and perspectives in our Company with diverse perspectives, backgrounds, and viewpoints. The Board has tasked the Company’s management team with taking a proactive approach to diversity, equality, and inclusion,developing the semiconductor workforce of the future, and periodically reviews our programs and processes to ensure continual improvement. In addition to this proactive approach to improving our Company, the Board encouraged the Company to commit resources to the well-being of our communities across the globe. Such resources include the Company-established Micron Foundation whose purpose is to provide grants that increase access to STEM education and careers and towards resources for basic living needs. In fiscal 2021,2023, we committed a percentageinvested in strategic partnerships to bolster the representation of our cash investments, about $280 million, to be managed by financial institutions owned by underrepresented groups, — a goal we exceeded this year. These investments will have a multiplying effect onupheld pay equity, and continued our work to strengthen our culture of inclusion. The diversity, equality, and inclusion (“DEI”) commitments set forth in our 2023 DEI Report extend beyond Micron to the economies of underrepresented communities. We also awarded each of Micron’s ten employee resource groups (“ERGs”) $50,000 to distribute to charities. These awards empowered our ERGs to direct resources and investments to further uplift thebroader communities where team memberswe work and live, and work,exemplify our dedication to accelerating inclusive economic prospects, nurturing diverse business ecosystems, and they distributed $500,000 across 19 nonprofits.ensuring their sustainable growth. Micron’s business requires the kind of innovation and resilience that can only be delivered by a supply chain that embraces inclusive sourcing practices. In fiscal 2023, we met our annual target and achieved over $500 million in spending with Tier 1 and Tier 2 diverse suppliers.


Diversity


Our Board believes a diverse workforce is a competitive advantage and that diverse teams drive more innovation, delivering value to our customers and increased returns to shareholders. We believe diverse teams expand creativity and problem-solving, lead to better decision-making, and enhance team member engagement and retention. Encouraged by our Board, we actively pursue a diverseour proactive strategies tap into latent talent, pool using advancedreaching out to communities of women, veterans, people with disabilities, rural communities, and other underrepresented groups globally. This is bolstered by leveraging cutting-edge technologies, forming robust industry alliances, fostering academic collaborations, and inclusive hiring practices,curating innovative avenues for non-traditional talent pathways like apprenticeships and we partner with universities around the world to help us grow a workforce that reflects our customers and our communities.return-to-work programs.


micron-logo-black-rgb-75x21.jpg15

Equality


We believe our vision to enrich life for all includes how we compensate our employees. We analyze our global compensation and benefits to ensure opportunities for all employees because our People value makes it essential that we pay everyone fairly. In fiscal 2021,2023, we proudly achieved comprehensive global pay equity for all employees in total compensation across base, bonuses and stock rewards. We have a regular review cadence for pay globally—including base pay and stock awards. If we find gaps duringWith the review, we fix them. We work withassistance of a third-party specialist and use dynamicstate-of-the-art technology, to help uswe analyze and understand our pay variancesrectify any disparities in compensation. This rigor encompasses all groups: including women, veterans, people with disabilities, and adjust when needed. Historically,specific racial and ethnic communities. Furthermore, our pay equity study has focused on gender globally. We have expanded our study to focus on all underrepresented groups: women and people with disabilities globally and veterans, Blacks, and Hispanics in the United States. We are committed toanalysis for salary will be conducted when we reinstate base pay equity for all.increases.

We have introduced training on inclusion allyship, inviting our global employees to learn from various underrepresented groups about the challenges and injustices they face as a result of their differences. These trainings help our employees and leaders understand, recognize, and overcome the unconscious biases we all have. We have also added an inclusion advocate in talent review meetings. The inclusion advocate listens carefully for unconscious bias, calls any to the attention of the team, and challenges unfair assumptions to ensure decisions regarding promotions, rotation assignments, access to training and other advancement opportunities are determined fairly.

We also provide grants to minority-owned businesses to help underrepresented businesses have equitable opportunities, which also creates a multiplying effect on the economies of those communities.

14 |2021 Proxy Statement



Inclusion


We believe that creating an inclusive culture at Micron helps us unleash the human potential of our team members, so everyone feels seen, heard, valued, and respected. These values help us create an environment where team members know they can bring their whole selves to work developing the next solution for data storage,artificial intelligence, advanced health care technology, self-driving cars, or whatever our applications need to do to drive technology forward. InTo further this mission, we have mandated comprehensive training for all employees on fostering a respectful workplace, free from harassment or discrimination. As we navigate the complexities of a volatile global economy, we have also rolled out tailored training modules to empower our leaders to navigate uncertainties with confidence. Furthermore, recognizing the significance of mental health and well-being, we have introduced a suite of masterclasses focused on fostering resilience and long-term wellness for our employees. We also leverage our 10 Employee Resource Groups (“ERGs”), whose members are our ambassadors of inclusion. ERG membership swelled to 47% globally in fiscal 2021,2023, and we setreward our ERG leaders with stock grants for their leadership.

For a goal of having all team members complete inclusion ally training, led bydetailed insight into our various ERGs. Almost allDEI initiatives and their global impact, please refer to our team members — 99.9% — completed the course, and thousands completed more than one course because they understand the importance of active allyship.

Please see our Diversity, Equality & Inclusionlatest DEI Annual Report 2020, available at micron.com/DEI, for more information about how we are ensuring diversity, equality, and inclusion are part of our Company’s global DNA, expanding to a global focus, especially in Asia. Our Diversity, Equality & Inclusion Report 2020 and the information at or accessible through our website, are not part of or incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement.DEI.


Sustainability


Our commitment to understanding and addressing environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) issues along our value chain and in our communities is a critical part of our culture and our vision to transform how the world uses information to enrich life for all.all. Our Board considers ESG issues to be an integral part of its business oversight and our corporate strategy and has encouraged a proactive approach toward mitigating our impact on the environment, supporting our team members and the communities in which they live, respecting human rights, driving transparency and accountability in our supply chain, and developing innovative products that support a sustainable future. We have developed and are executing on a sustainabilitysustainability strategy in response to these issues that leverages our leading products, responsible sourcing and operations, and engaged team members.


The Board, supported by the Governance and Sustainability Committee and other Board committees as needed, oversees and monitors the development and integration of this strategy and regularly reviews sustainability performance. Board oversight includes, but is not limited to, material ESG trends and related longlong- and short-term impacts of the Company’s operations, supply chains, and products, as well as the Company’s activities and annual public reporting on these topics directed by the Company’s Sustainability Council, sustainability staff, and various teams implementing the Company’s sustainability efforts.


The Governance and Sustainability Committee reviews and discusses ESG issues at each regularly-scheduled committee meeting. Discussions and reports to the Committeecommittee include information about significant ESG issues, such as observations from consultations with team members, customers, investors, and other stakeholders about their interests and expectations for us; our social and environmental impacts and benefits; and the impacts of these issues on our business. Over the past year, theThe Governance and Sustainability Committee reviewedregularly reviews the implementation of our first-ever long-term environmental goals and aspirations. We expect to allocate about $1 billion of capital expenditures to support these goals, though we cannot guarantee that our environmental goals and aspirations set forth below will be realized. These goals and initiatives have been developed based in part on feedback from investors, customers, and current and prospective team members, and are a critical component of our management of
16 |2023 Proxy Statement

evolving physical, regulatory, market, supply chain, and other risks and opportunities related to climate change, water availability, and other ESG issues.

micronnamea.jpg15



Our Environmental Goals and Aspirations
GoalsAspirations
Emissions:
75% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions per unit of production in calendar year 2030 vs. calendar year 2018

42% absolute reduction in scope 1 emissions by calendar year 2030 vs. calendar year 2020
Carbon neutral
Net zero scope 1 and 2 emissions by
calendar year 2050
Energy:
100% renewable energy in U.S. operations in calendar year 2025

100% renewable energy in Malaysia in calendar year 2022
100% renewable energy worldwide, where available
Water:75% water conservation through reuse, recycling, orand restoration in calendar year 2030
100% water conservation through reuse,
recycling, orand restoration
Waste:95% reuse, recycle, and recovery and zero hazardous waste to landfill in calendar year 2030*100% reuse, recycle, and recovery and zero
Zero waste to landfill through waste minimization,
reuse, recycling, and recovery
* Subject to alternate disposal vendor availability


In fiscal 2021,2023, the Board also reviewed:


our annual sustainability report content and processes, which in fiscal 20212023 included indexes and information aligning with the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (“SASB”) semiconductor industry standard and Taskforce on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (“TCFD”), supporting investor requests to align with the SASB standard and TCFD recommendations;


our responsible sourcing and human rights efforts, including our conflict minerals report outlining our response to human rights and other concerns related to mineral sourcing as well as our annual modern slavery and human trafficking statement;


our human capital initiatives, including our talent acquisition, retention, and development policies and practices; and


findings from team member, customer, investor and other stakeholder engagement exercises.


We strive to make a positive impact on our team members, the communities in which we operate, and the planet, as well as our customers’ sustainability performance. We plan to continue regular consultation with stakeholders regarding environmental and social issues and report annually on our progress in these efforts. Our 20212023 Sustainability Report, available at micron.com/sustainability, includes more details about the ways we are committed to sustainable practices and supporting our global community. Our Sustainability Report, and the information at or accessible through our website, are not part of or incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement.


Risk Assessment and Mitigation


We operate in a dynamic economic, social, and political landscape, making structured and conscientious risk management more important than ever. Our Board reviews and oversees our Enterprise Risk Management (“ERM”)enterprise risk management program, which is a unified approach to risk management that helps us achieve a shared understanding of risks and make informed business decisions. This approach enhances our capability to address future events that create uncertainty and respond in an efficient and effective manner. It also facilitates prompt action to mitigate identified risks and embeds risk management into our culture.


micron-logo-black-rgb-75x21.jpg17

The Board has delegated primary oversight of our ERMenterprise risk management process to the Audit Committee, which conducts reviews of our risk assessment and ERMenterprise risk management policies as described below, including overseeing the management of risks related to financial reporting and compliance. Other Board committees provide additional insights into our ERMenterprise risk management program in the areas of their core competencies, and report to the Board regularly on matters relating to the following specific areas of risk the committees oversee:


The Compensation Committee oversees management of risks relating to our compensation plans and programs.
16 |2021 Proxy Statement




The Finance Committee oversees the Company’s strategies for management of significant financial risks.


The Governance and Sustainability Committee oversees risks associated with the Board of Directors’Board’s governance, director independence, and the Company’s human capital programs and sustainability initiatives.initiatives, and public policy and government affairs activities.


The Security Committee oversees risks associated with physical security and cybersecurity.


ERMIn performing their oversight responsibilities, the Board and each committee has full access to management, as well as the ability to engage independent advisors. In addition, the Chairman of the Board leads regular executive sessions of the independent directors, facilitates cross-committee feedback, and fosters open dialogue and constructive feedback among the independent directors, which further supports the Board’s ability to fulfill its risk oversight duties.

Enterprise Risk Management Process


We designed our ERMenterprise risk management program to clearly identify risk management roles and responsibilities, bring together senior management to discuss risk, promote visibility and constructive dialogue, and facilitate risk response and mitigation strategies. The Audit Committee plays a key role in this process, and the full Board conducts periodic reviews.


As an initial step, our Vice President of Risk Advisory Services representative meets periodically with business unit and functional area heads to identify significant financial and nonfinancial risk exposures and to develop risk mitigation measures and contingency plans.


After we collect data from stakeholders throughout the Company, our Risk Advisory Services representative summarizes the results of these meetings and creates a consolidated risk profile.


Our Risk Advisory Services representative then reviews this risk profile with our senior management, seeking input and agreement on mitigation and response strategies. This process is iterative, and repeats as significant risks are added to, or are removed from, the ERMenterprise risk management program.


Our Risk Advisory Services representative attends quarterly Audit Committee meetings, where the Audit Committee reviews our risk profile and mitigation and response strategies, as well as our progress toward mitigating identified risks. This process repeats for the full Board periodically.


After incorporating input from the Audit Committee and/or the full Board, Risk Advisory Services designs our internal audit strategies and plans to minimize the impact of relevant risks.


Compensation Risks


The Compensation Committee reviews our compensation programs annually and has concluded that our compensation policies and practices are not reasonably likely to create situations that would have a material adverse effect on us. In making this assessment, the Compensation Committeewe, with guidance from our outside compensation consultants, reviewed our compensation programs to determine if the programs’ provisions and operations create undesired or unintentional risk of a material nature. The Compensation Committee alsothen reviewed the results of our findings with our outside compensation consultant. This risk assessment process included a review of program policies
18 |2023 Proxy Statement

and practices; program analysis to identify risk and risk-control related to the programs; and determinations as to the sufficiency of risk identification, the balance of potential risk to potential reward, and risk-control. Although the Compensation Committee reviewed all compensation programs, the Committee focused on the programs with variability of payout, with the ability of a participant to directly affect payout, and the controls on participant action and payout. In most cases, our compensation policies and practices are centrally designed and administered and are substantially the same across the Company. Certain internal groups have different or supplemental compensation programs tailored to their specific operations and goals, and programs may differ by country due to variations in local laws and customs.


Cybersecurity Risks

micronnamea.jpg17The Security Committee regularly reviews and oversees our policies and practices to identify and mitigate cybersecurity risks. Our management team under the direction of our Corporate Vice President and Chief Information Officer updates the Security Committee at least quarterly on cybersecurity matters. Our cybersecurity policies and practices follow the cybersecurity framework of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). We engage third parties to perform assessments of our risks from material cybersecurity threats and cybersecurity measures at least annually. The results of those assessments are reported to the Security Committee, and we make adjustments to our cybersecurity policies and practices as necessary in light of the assessments. While we have not experienced a material information security (cybersecurity) incident in the past three fiscal years, we maintain an information security (cybersecurity) risk insurance policy as a matter of good practice.



Board Processes and Policies


Code of Business Conduct and Ethics


Acting ethically is a critical part of our culture and our vision to transform how the world uses information to enrich life for all. The Board has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that is applicable to all our directors, officers, and team members. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics sets out our expectations regarding the treatment of our team members, customers, and the communities in which we operate, as well as our commitment to high product quality, ethical and legal sourcing of our materials, and acting with integrity for our investors. A copy of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available at www.micron.com and is also available in print without charge upon request. Any amendments or waivers of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics will also be posted on our website within four business days of the amendment or waiver as required by applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and the Listing Rules of Nasdaq.


Anti-Hedging Policy

Our Insider Trading Policy prohibits officers and directors from engaging in speculative transactions involving the Company's securities, including short sales or puts, calls or other options on the Company's common stock.

Board Self-Evaluation


The Governance and Sustainability Committee oversees the Board’s ongoing and annual assessments of its effectiveness, including the effectiveness of its committees and directors. All directors complete an evaluation form for the Board and for each committee on which they serve. These forms include ratings for certain key metrics, as well as the opportunity for written comments. The comments provide key insights into the areas directors believe the Board can improve or in which its performance is strong. Evaluation topics include number and length of meetings, topics covered and materials provided, committee structure and activities, Board composition and expertise, succession planning, director participation and interaction with management, and promotion of ethical behavior. Our Board considers the results when making decisions on the composition, structure and responsibilities of our Board and its committees, agendas and meeting schedules for our Board and its committees, and changes in the performance or functioning of our Board.Board, and such evaluations are taken into account when the Board makes decisions regarding nominations of directors.


micron-logo-black-rgb-75x21.jpg19

Table of Contents
Director Skills Evaluation


The Governance and Sustainability Committee oversees the Board’s ongoing and annual assessments of the Board’s composition and the skills each director possesses. The Governance and Sustainability Committee has identified and continually refines a list of skills, attributes, and experiences that it believes will result in an effective, dynamic, and diverse Board. The Governance and Sustainability Committee then reviews each director on a matrix of relevant skills and qualifications in an effort to identify any needed skills, experiences, or perspectives. The Governance and Sustainability Committee uses the insights this matrix provides to recommend committee assignments and inform searches for new director candidates or opportunities to refresh Board composition.


Director Time Commitment Policy

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that no non-employee member of the Board may serve on the board of directors of more than four other public companies and no employee member of the Board may serve on the board of directors of more than two other public companies. However, this limitation will not apply if the Board determines that simultaneous service does not impair the ability of the member to effectively serve on the Board. A director’s time commitment is considered as part of the director nomination process and is reviewed annually.

Board Structure


Director Independence


The Board has determined that directors Beyer, Dugle, Gomo, Haynesworth, McCarthy, Switz, and Wright qualify as independent directors. In determining the independence of our directors, the Board of Directors has adopted independence standards that mirror the criteria specified by applicable laws and regulations of the SEC and the Listing Rules of Nasdaq. None of these directors have a relationship which, in the opinion of the Board, would interfere with us, other than any relationship that is categorically not material under the guidelines referenced above. See “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.”exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.


Board Leadership Structure


Mr. Switz has served as our independent Chair of the Board since February 2012. We do not have a fixed policy on whether the roles of Chair of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerCEO should be separate or combined. The Board’s decisiondetermination to have an independent, non-employee director as our Chair is based on the Board’s consideration of our and our shareholders’ best interests under the circumstances existingcurrent circumstances. The Board periodically reviews our leadership structure and when appropriate, recommends changes to the Board’s leadership structure, taking into consideration the needs of the Board and the Company at such time. The Board believes Mr. Switz provides strong and independent oversight and helps ensure effective collaboration among the time. directors based on his past leadership of our Board, experience as chief executive officer and chairman of a leading technology company and past and current membership on other public company boards.

In his role as Chair, Mr. Switz oversees meetingsour Board and facilitates the flow of information between it and management. This fosters open dialogue and constructive feedback among our independent Board members and management. In particular, our Chair has the independent directorsfollowing duties and actsresponsibilities, as determined by the Board and as set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines:

serves as a liaison between the CEO and the independent directorsdirectors;

presides at, and Chief Executive Officer.chairs, Board meetings and meetings of shareholders;


establishes agendas for each Board meeting in consultation with the chairs of applicable committees of the Board;

leads executive sessions of the Board;

has authority to call Board meetings, special meetings of shareholders, and meetings of the independent directors;
18 20 |20212023 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

leads the Board in discussions concerning the CEO’s performance and CEO succession;

approves meeting schedules for the Board;

approves information sent to the Board;

if requested by major shareholders, is available for consultation and direct communication; and

performs such other duties and responsibilities as requested by the Board.

Board Meetings and Committees


Our Board held tentwelve formal meetings during fiscal 2021.2023. The Board met in Executive Session (meetings in which only non-employeeindependent directors are present) foureight times during fiscal 2021.2023. In fiscal 2021,2023, the Board had a standing Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Finance Committee, Governance and Sustainability Committee, and Security Committee (established in June 2021).Committee. During fiscal 2021,2023, the Audit Committee met eightfourteen times, the Compensation Committee met fivesix times, the Finance Committee met fourfive times, the Governance and Sustainability Committee met four times, and the Security Committee met one time.four times. In addition to formal committee meetings, the chair of each committee engaged in regular discussions with management regarding various issues relevant to their respective committees. All incumbent directors attended 75% or more of the total number of meetings of the Board and the committees on which they served during fiscal 2021. All incumbent directors who served on the Audit, Compensation, Finance, Governance and Sustainability, and Security Committees attended 75% or more of the total number of applicable committee meetings during fiscal 2021.2023. We encourageexpect director attendance at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, and all then-incumbentthen-serving members of our Board were present at the Fiscal 20202022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

The Audit, Compensation, Finance, Governance and Sustainability, and Security Committees each have written charters that comply with SEC and Nasdaq rules relating to corporate governance matters. Copies of the committee charters as well as our Corporate Governance Guidelines are available at www.micron.com and are also available in print without charge upon request to corporatesecretary@micron.com. The Board has determined that all the members of the Audit, Compensation, Governance and Sustainability, and Security Committees satisfy the independence requirements of applicable SEC laws and the Listing Rules of Nasdaq for such committees.


Audit Committee


Mses. McCarthy and Dugle and Mr. Gomo currently serve, and during fiscal 2023 served, on the Audit Committee. During fiscal 2021, Mses.Ms. McCarthy and Dugle and Messrs. Bailey and Gomo served on the Audit Committee (Mr. Bailey served until his resignation from the Board in January 2021). Mr. Gomo has served as the Chair of the Audit Committee since January 2023. Prior to that Mr. Gomo served as Audit Committee Chair since January 2019. The Board has determined that all Audit Committee members qualifyare independent under the rules applicable to audit committee members promulgated by the SEC and Nasdaq and each qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” for purposes of the rules and regulations of the SEC and that each of these members is sufficiently proficient in reading and understanding our financial statements to serve on the Audit Committee. The purpose of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board in overseeing and monitoring:


the integrity of our financial statements;


the adequacy of our internal controls and procedures;


the performance of our internal audit function;


the performance of our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm;


the qualifications and independence of our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm; and


our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.


micron-logo-black-rgb-75x21.jpg21

The Audit Committee is also responsible for preparing the Audit Committee report that is included in our annual Proxy Statement. See “Audit Committee Matters – Report of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.” The complete duties and responsibilities of the Audit Committee are set forth in its written charter, which is available at www.micron.com and is also available in print without charge upon request to corporatesecretary@micron.com.


Compensation Committee


Ms. Wright and Messrs. Beyer and Switz currently serve, on the Compensation Committee. Duringand during fiscal 2021, Ms. Wright and Messrs. Beyer and Switz2023 served, on the Compensation Committee. Mr. Beyer has served as the Chair of the Compensation Committee since April 2021. Previously, Mr. Switz had served as the Chair of the Compensation Committee since January 2019. The Board has determined that all Compensation Committee members qualifyare independent under the rules applicable to compensation committee members promulgated by the SEC and Nasdaq and each qualifies as a “non-employee directors”director” as defined under Rule 16b-3 promulgated under Section 16 of the
micronnamea.jpg19


Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). The Compensation Committee is responsible for reviewing and approving the compensation of our executive officers. See “Executive Compensation and Related Information – Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and “– Compensation Committee Report” for information regarding how the Compensation Committee sets executive compensation levels. The Compensation Committee has authority to delegate any of its responsibilities to a subcommittee as it may deem appropriate in its judgment. The complete duties of the Compensation Committee are set forth in its written charter, which is available at www.micron.com and is also available in print without charge upon request to corporatesecretary@micron.com.


Finance Committee


Ms. McCarthy and Messrs. Gomo and Mehrotra currently serve, and during fiscal 2023 served, on the Finance Committee. During fiscal 2021, Mses. Dugle and McCarthy, and Messrs. Bailey,Mr. Gomo and Mehrotra served on the Finance Committee (Mr. Bailey served until his resignation from the Board in January 2021, and Ms. Dugle served until June 2021 when she became Chair of the Security Committee). Mr. Mehrotra joined the Finance Committee when he became our President and CEO in May 2017. Ms. McCarthy has served as the Chair of the Finance Committee since January 2023. Prior to that Ms. McCarthy had been the Finance Committee Chair since January 2019. The Finance Committee represents and assists the Board in discharging its responsibilities with respect to oversight of our financial policies, financial strategies, capital structure, debt and equity offerings, capital return program, cash management and investments, risk management related to hedge and derivative instruments, and insurance. The complete duties of the Finance Committee are set forth in its written charter, which is available at www.micron.com and is also available in print without charge upon request to corporatesecretary@micron.com.


Governance and Sustainability Committee


Mses. Haynesworth and Wright and Messrs. Beyer and Switz currently serve, on the Governance and Sustainability Committee. Duringduring fiscal 2021, Mses. Haynesworth and Wright and Messrs. Beyer and Switz2023 served, on the Governance and Sustainability Committee, with Ms. Haynesworth joining the Committee in April 2021.Committee. Ms. Wright has served as Chair of the Governance and Sustainability Committee since April 2021. Previously, Mr. Beyer had served as Chair of the Governance and Sustainability Committee since July 2018. The responsibilities of the Governance and Sustainability Committee include assisting the Board in discharging its duties with respect to the following:


the identification and selection of nominees to our Board;


director compensation;


oversight and monitoring of the development and integration of material social and environmental strategies;


oversight and monitoring of our human capital management efforts, including culture, talent development and retention, and diversity, equality, and inclusionDEI programs and initiatives;


the oversight and monitoring of the manner in which the Company conducts its public policy and government affairs, including policies and guidelines regarding political contributions by the Company, lobbying activities, our employee political action committee, contributions to trade associations and other similar organizations that engage in political activity;

the development of our Corporate Governance Guidelines; and


evaluation of the Board and management.


22 |2023 Proxy Statement

The complete duties and responsibilities of the Governance and Sustainability Committee are set forth in its written charter, which is available at www.micron.com and is also available in print without charge upon request to corporatesecretary@micron.com.


Security Committee


Mses. Dugle and Haynesworth and Mr. Beyer currently serve, on the Security Committee, which was established in June 2021. Duringand during fiscal 2021, Mses. Dugle and Haynesworth and Mr. Beyer2023 served, on the Security Committee. Ms. Dugle has served as Chair of the Security Committee since June 2021. The responsibilities of the Security Committee include assisting the Board in discharging its duties with respect to oversight of the following:


20 |2021 Proxy Statement


physical security of our facilities and employees as well as enterprise cybersecurity and data protection risks associated with our security-related infrastructure and related operations including outside partners;


cyber crisis preparedness and security breach and incident response plans;


compliance with applicable information security and data protection laws and industry standards;


our physical and cybersecurity strategy, crisis or incident management, and security-related information technology planning processes; and


public disclosure relating to security of our employees, facilities, and information technology systems, including privacy, network security, and data security.


The complete duties and responsibilities of the Security Committee are set forth in its written charter, which is available at www.micron.com and is also available in print without charge upon request to corporatesecretary@micron.com.


Executive Sessions and Communications with the Board of Directors


Mr. Switz has been the independent Chair of our Board since February 2012. As part of his duties as Chair, Mr. Switz chairs Executive Session meetings of our Board. The Board meets in executive session regularly and held eight meetings in fiscal year 2023.

Communications with the Board of Directors

Shareholders and interested parties wishing to communicate with our Board, or our non-employee directors as a group, may contact Mr. Switz, our Chair, at chair@micron.com.



CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS


Related party transactions are reviewed by our Board in accordance with our related party transaction policy. Related parties include our directors and officers, their family members and affiliates, and certain beneficial owners. In cases where the related party is a director or an affiliate of a director, that director does not participate in the review of the proposed transaction. In reviewing a proposed related party transaction, the Board considers all the relevant facts and circumstances of the transaction, such as (i) the nature and terms of the transaction, (ii) the dollar value of the transaction, (iii) whether the terms of the transaction are at least as favorable as they would have been if a related party was not involved, (iv) the business reasons for the transaction, (v) whether the transaction would result in an improper conflict of interest, and (vi) the effects of the transaction on the ongoing relationship between us and the related party. There were no actual or proposed related party transactions in excess of $120,000 forincurred in fiscal 2021 and through November 19, 2021.2023.
micronnamea.jpg21micron-logo-black-rgb-75x21.jpg23


Table of Contents
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION


The Governance and Sustainability Committee oversees the setting of compensation for our non-employee members of the Board.Board and recommends changes, if any, to the full Board for consideration. Each year, the Governance and Sustainability Committee works with ourthe compensation consultant to review and evaluate director compensation for the ensuing fiscal year, in light of prevailing market conditions and to attract, retain, and reward qualified non-employee directors. The compensation consultant gathers and reviews market data for non-employee directors from the same Compensation Peer Group used to evaluate officer compensation. For a discussion concerning the companies that comprised our Compensation Peer Group, please see “Executive Compensation and Related Information – Compensation Discussion and Analysis” below. Upon completion of its review and evaluation, the Governance and Sustainability Committee did not recommend to the Board any changes to the Board inamount of director compensation for fiscal 2022 except compensation for the newly-added position of Security Committee Chair.2024.


Elements of Director Compensation


Annual Retainer and Committee Chair Remuneration


Non-employee directors were entitled to receive an annual cash retainer of $125,000 in fiscal 2021.2023, assuming the director serves for the entire year. Pursuant to our 2008 Director’s Compensation Plan (the “DCP”), which operates as a sub-plan of the Amended and Restated 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2007 Plan”), non-employee directors may elect to take some or all of their annual cash retainer, in the form of cash, shares of Common Stock or deferred rights to receive Common Stock (in either case, having an initial value equal to the cash amount foregone) upon termination as a director. As part of the Company's fiscal 2023 cost-cutting program, the directors voluntarily reduced their fiscal 2023 cash compensation by 20% for the period from February 1, 2023 through the end of fiscal 2023. Employee directors receive no additional or special remuneration for their service as directors. The amounts earned by the non-employee directors in respect of their service during fiscal 20212023 are set forth below under “Fiscal 20212023 Director Compensation.”


Set forth below are the standard cash amounts directors were and are entitled to receive for their service as committee chair or Chair of the Board of Directors for fiscal 20212023 and 2022:2024 (assuming in each case service for the entire year):
2022202120242023
Audit Committee ChairAudit Committee Chair$35,000 $35,000 Audit Committee Chair$35,000 $35,000 
Compensation Committee ChairCompensation Committee Chair30,00030,000Compensation Committee Chair30,00030,000
Finance Committee ChairFinance Committee Chair20,00020,000Finance Committee Chair20,00020,000
Governance and Sustainability Committee ChairGovernance and Sustainability Committee Chair20,00020,000Governance and Sustainability Committee Chair20,00020,000
Security Committee ChairSecurity Committee Chair20,000Security Committee Chair20,00020,000
Chair of the Board of Directors150,000150,000
Chair of the BoardChair of the Board150,000150,000


The amounts shown in the table are in addition to the annual retainer payable to all directors for service on the Board.

As a result of the voluntary pay reduction, for fiscal 2023 only, the actual cash amounts directors were entitled to receive for their service as committee chair or Chair of the Board for the full fiscal 2023 were:
2023
Audit Committee Chair$30,917 
Compensation Committee Chair26,500
Finance Committee Chair17,667
Governance and Sustainability Committee Chair17,667
Security Committee Chair17,667
Chair of the Board132,500
24 |2023 Proxy Statement

Table of Contents
Except for the foregoing, directors do not receive any additional or special cash remuneration for their service on any of the committees established by the Board. We reimburse directors for travel and lodging expenses, if any, incurred in connection with attendance at Board of Directors’or committee meetings.


Equity Award


Non-employee directors receive an equity award each fiscal year. Since fiscal 2007, the equity award has been exclusively in the form of restricted stock. The restricted stock includes the potential to receive dividend equivalents (at the same rate as for Common Stock generally), which will accumulate and pay out (in cash) only if and when the underlying shares are released. The “targeted value” for the annual non-employee director equity award is established each year by the Board following discussions with ourthe compensation consultant and has been set at $250,000 since fiscal 2015. The number of shares of restricted sharesstock awarded to each non-employee director is determined by dividing the applicable targeted value by the Fair Market Value of a share of our Common Stock, as defined under our equity plans. For purposes of our equity plans, “Fair Market Value” is the closing price of our Common Stock on the last market-trading day prior to the date of grant. The restrictions on thethese restricted shares awarded in fiscal 20212023 lapse for 100% of such shares on the first anniversary of the date of grant (the “Vesting Period”). Notwithstanding the foregoing, the restrictions will lapse for 100% of such shares in the event a director reaches the mandatory retirement age, if any, or retires from the Board during the Vesting Period having achieved a minimum of three years of service with the Board prior to the effective date of their retirement, or upon a director’s death or disability.
22 |2021 Proxy Statement




In October 2023, the DCP was amended to allow non-employee directors to defer receipt of their equity awards that are granted in fiscal 2024 and later years. If a director makes a deferral election, shares subject to the director’s deferred equity awards will be delivered (to the extent vested) upon termination of service as a director.

Fiscal 20212023 Director Compensation


The following table details the total compensation earned by our non-employee directors in fiscal 2021.
NameFees Earned or Paid in Cash(1)Stock Awards(2)Total
Robert L. Bailey(3)$46,528 $249,987 $296,515 
Richard M. Beyer148,388 249,987 398,375 
Lynn A. Dugle127,458 249,987 377,445 
Steven Gomo160,000 249,987 409,987 
Linnie Haynesworth(4)67,708 137,384 205,092 
Mary Pat McCarthy145,000 249,987 394,987 
Robert E. Switz294,835 249,987 544,822 
MaryAnn Wright131,776 249,987 381,763 
2023.
NameFees Earned or Paid in Cash(1)Stock Awards(2)Total
Richard M. Beyer$136,917 $249,982 $386,899 
Lynn A. Dugle128,083 249,982 378,065 
Steven J. Gomo133,083 249,982 383,065 
Linnie M. Haynesworth110,417 249,982 360,399 
Mary Pat McCarthy136,333 249,982 386,315 
Robert E. Switz242,917 249,982 492,899 
MaryAnn Wright128,083 249,982 378,065 


(1)AmountsThe amounts shown are lower than they otherwise would have been based on our standard Board compensation policy because, as part of the Company's fiscal 2023 cost cutting program, the directors voluntarily reduced their fiscal 2023 cash compensation by 20% for Mr. Bailey represent fees earned up to his resignation on January 14, 2021. Amounts for Ms. Haynesworth represent fees earnedthe period from February 15, 2021,1, 2023 through the date she joined the Board, to September 2, 2021.end of fiscal 2023.

(2)On October 16, 2020,13, 2022, each of Messrs. Bailey, Beyer, Gomo, and Switz, and Mses. Dugle, Haynesworth, McCarthy, and Wright was granted 4,8134,739 shares of restricted stock with a grant date fair value of $249,987$249,982 ($51.94 per share). On February 15, 2021, Ms. Haynesworth was granted 1,561 shares of restricted stock with a grant date fair value of $137,384 ($88.0152.75 per share). For information on the restrictions associated with these awards, see “Elements of Director Compensation – Equity Award” above.

As of August 31, 2023, each of Messrs. Beyer, Gomo, and Switz, and Mses. Dugle, Haynesworth, McCarthy, and Wright had outstanding a grant of 4,739 shares of restricted stock. For information regarding Mr. Mehrotra’s holding of stock as of August 31, 2023, see “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal 2023 Year-End” below.
(3)Mr. Bailey terminated Board service on January 14, 2021.
(4)Ms. Haynesworth joined the Board on February 15, 2021, and therefore, her “Fees Earned or Paid in Cash” and “Stock Awards” are prorated.
micron-logo-black-rgb-75x21.jpg25

Table of Contents
Stock Ownership Guidelines


We have established stock ownership guidelines for our non-employee directors. The minimum ownership guideline for directors is to hold shares with a value equal to five times their annual retainer. The minimum ownership guideline for our CEO is to hold shares with a value equal to five times his base salary. Directors are given five years to meet the ownership guidelines. The Governance and Sustainability Committee reviews the Ownership Guidelines annually and monitors each person’s progress toward, and continued compliance with, the guidelines. Stock sales restrictions may be imposed upon directors if the stock ownership guidelines are not met. All our directors are either in compliance with the guidelines or are newer directors who have time remaining to meet the guidelines.

micronnamea.jpg23



The following table shows non-employee director compliance with the guidelines as of the Record Date:fiscal 2023 year-end:
DirectorDirectorGuideline MultiplierGuideline AmountCompliance with GuidelineDirectorGuideline MultiplierGuideline AmountCompliance with Guideline
Richard M. BeyerRichard M. Beyer5$625,000 YesRichard M. Beyer5$552,083 Yes
Lynn A. DugleLynn A. Dugle5625,000 YesLynn A. Dugle5552,083 Yes
Steven J. GomoSteven J. Gomo5625,000 YesSteven J. Gomo5552,083 Yes
Linnie Haynesworth5625,000 (1)
Linnie M. HaynesworthLinnie M. Haynesworth5552,083 Yes
Mary Pat McCarthyMary Pat McCarthy5625,000 YesMary Pat McCarthy5552,083 Yes
Robert E. SwitzRobert E. Switz5625,000 YesRobert E. Switz5552,083 Yes
MaryAnn WrightMaryAnn Wright5625,000 YesMaryAnn Wright5552,083 Yes


(1)Ms. Haynesworth has until February 15, 2026 to meet the guidelines because she first joined the Board in 2021.

Please refer to page 4854 for information on the stock ownership guidelines for our CEO and other Named Executive Officers, including Mr. Mehrotra.


Officers.
24 26 |20212023 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND RELATED INFORMATION
PROPOSAL 2 – ADVISORY VOTE ON THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS (“SAY-ON-PAY”)
PROPOSAL DETAILS


The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) enables our shareholders to vote to approve, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, the compensation of our Named Executive Officers as described in this Proxy Statement inOfficers. The say-on-pay vote is required by Section 14A of the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section and the related compensation tables beginning on page 27.Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78n-1). We seek your advisory vote and ask that you indicate your support for the compensation of the Named Executive Officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement.Statement in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section and the related compensation tables beginning on page 28.


This “say-on-pay” proposal gives our shareholders the opportunity to express their views on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our Named Executive Officers as described in this Proxy Statement. At our fiscalFiscal 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, our shareholders voted to have an annual advisory vote on say-on-pay and in accordance with the results of this vote, the Board of Directors determined to implement an advisory vote on executive compensation every year until the next required vote on the frequency of shareholder votes on the compensation of executives, which is expected to occur at the Fiscal 2023occurring this year and is set forth as Proposal 3.

At our Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

At our annual meeting of shareholdersShareholders held in January 2021, 85%2023, 71% of the votes cast on the say-on-pay proposal were voted in favor of the proposal. See “Consideration of“Shareholder Engagement Shaped Our Response to the Fiscal 2020 Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation”2022 Say-on-Pay Vote” on page 31.31 for details regarding our efforts to understand and respond to last year’s say-on-pay vote.


Please read the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section and related compensation tables for information necessary to inform your vote on this proposal.


BOARD RECOMMENDATION


The Board of Directors invites you to review carefully the Compensation Discussion and Analysis beginning on page 2728 and the tabular and other disclosures on executive compensation beginning on page 50,60, and cast a vote FOR“FOR” the following resolution:


“Resolved, that shareholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of Micron’s Named Executive Officers, as discussed and disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the executive compensation tables, and any narrative executive compensation disclosure contained in this Proxy Statement.”


VOTE REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL

The “FOR” vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of the shares of our Common Stock attending online in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting is required to approve the non-binding advisory vote on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers.

The say-on-pay vote is required by Section 14A of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78n-1) and is advisory and therefore not binding on us, the Compensation Committee, or the Board, of Directors.and will not be construed as overruling a decision by our Company or our Board or creating or implying any additional fiduciary duty for our Company or our Board. Furthermore, because this non-binding, advisory resolution primarily relates to the compensation of our Named Executive Officers that has already been paid or contractually committed, there may not be an opportunity for us to revisit these decisions. However, the Board of Directors and Compensation Committee value the opinions of our shareholders and will consider the results of the say-on-pay vote and any other feedback from shareholders in their evaluation of our compensation program as they believe to be appropriate.

micronnamea.jpg25


VOTE REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL

The affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power of our Common Stock present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on this Proposal 2 is required to approve the non-binding advisory vote on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers.

While this vote is non-binding on our Company and our Board of Directors, and will not be construed as overruling a decision by our Company or our Board or creating or implying any additional fiduciary duty for our Company or our Board, our Board and the Compensation Committee value the opinions of our shareholders and will consider the outcome of the vote when making future compensation decisions for Named Executive Officers under our executive compensation program.
26 |2021 Proxy Statementmicron-logo-black-rgb-75x21.jpg27


Table of Contents
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


This Compensation Discussion and Analysis presents material information helpful or necessary to understand the objectives and policies of our compensation program for executive officers and the compensation reported in the tables that follow. This discussion focuses on the compensation awarded to, earned by, and paid to the following individuals:


Sanjay Mehrotra, our President and Chief Executive Officer;Page 28-4.jpg

David A. Zinsner, our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer;

Manish Bhatia, our Executive Vice President, Global Operations;

Scott J. DeBoer, our Executive Vice President, Technology and Products; and

Sumit Sadana, our Executive Vice President and Chief Business Officer.


Throughout this discussion and elsewhere in this Proxy Statement, the foregoing individuals are referred to as our “Named Executive Officers.”


Executive Summary


Financial Highlights

Fiscal 2021 Highlights2023 was a challenging year for the memory and storage industry and resulted in a significant impact to financial performance. Despite this difficult backdrop, the Micron team stayed focused on our strategy, executed well, accomplished several important milestones, and delivered the following financial results.


Page 29.jpg
28 |2023 Proxy Statement

We achieved robust profitability in fiscal 2021 with record revenues across a diverse set of markets, including mobile, embedded, auto, and industrial, with an all-time high for NAND revenue:

$27.7 billion in revenue (compared to $21.4 billion in fiscal 2020);
$5.9 billion in GAAP net income attributable to Micron, or $5.14 in earnings per diluted share (compared to $2.7 billion and $2.37, respectively, in fiscal 2020).

We ended fiscal 2021 with $10.5 billion of cash, marketable investments, and restricted cash.

We initiated a quarterly dividend that was paid in October 2021, reflectingsustained our confidence in the durable cash generation power of our business, and we plan to grow the dividend over time.

For the first time in our history, we established technology leadership concurrentlyand launched a suite of leading-edge products that represent one of the strongest portfolio expansions in bothMicron’s 45-year history. In addition, our industry-leading DRAM and NAND with our 1-alpha DRAM and 176-layer NAND, the industry’s most advanced nodes in high volume production, reaching mature yields 20% to 30% faster than prior nodes:

DRAM:
1-alpha and 1z DRAM nodes combined represented the majority of our DRAM bit production by fiscal year end; and
We were the first to introduce LP5X DRAM in mobile applications and safety-capable LP5 for automotive applications.

NAND:
We were the first to introduce uMCP5 managed NAND in mobile applications;
We continued our leadership on high-density QLC NAND storage with client QLC SSD bit mix hitting a new record; and
We moved our SSD portfolios toward leadership datacenter solutions.

We entered into new credit facilities with interest rates and fees linked in part to achievement of sustainability targets and continued to maketechnology made strong progress toward achieving our long-term environmental goals
micronnamea.jpg27


and aspirations announced in fiscal 2020 with plans to allocate about $1 billion of capital expenditures in support of those goals and aspirations.2023:


The representation of women on the Board grew to comprise one-half of the Board in fiscal 2021.Page 27-2.jpg

Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”)


The following chart shows our one- and three-year relative TSRtotal shareholder return data through the last trading day of fiscal 2023 as compared to the S&P 500 Composite Index, the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index (“SOX”) and the median of our Compensation Peer Group as identified in "Compensation-setting“Compensation-Setting Process and the Determination of Compensation Levels – ”Market Data” Defined"‘Market Data’ Defined” below. Throughout the Executive Compensation and Related Information section of this Proxy Statement, we refer to total shareholder return as “TSR” and relative TSR as “rTSR.”


chart-d0d662524c7147ec81ea.jpg

Page 36.jpg
The information presented above is based on closing prices on or nearest to September 2 for each period presented aboveAugust 31st and represents annualized rates of return reflecting price appreciation plus reinvestment of dividends and the compounding effect of dividends paid, if any, on reinvested dividends.


Compensation Highlights

In October 2020, the Compensation Committee set compensation levels and performance goals for fiscal 2021 based on a review of financial results, projections, individual contributions, strategic objectives, Market Data (as defined below), and market conditions.


28 |2021 Proxy Statementmicron-logo-black-rgb-75x21.jpg29


Table of Contents
Executive Compensation Highlights

The following pay mix, based on target amounts was established in October 2022, for our Chief Executive OfficerCEO and other Named Executive Officers (on average) for fiscal 2021:2023, as shown below, was heavily weighted towards variable, at risk compensation opportunities.


paymixgraphic_2021a.jpgPage 35.jpg


Short-Term Incentive Awards Suspended. Our Named Executive Officers are typically eligible to earn short-term incentive awards pursuant to our Executive Officer Performance Incentive Plan (“EIP”). The Compensation Committee selected performance goals for our Named Executive Officers based on their correlationHowever, due to the creationchallenging business environment noted above and as part of shareholder valuea significant program to reduce Company costs and their alignment with our strategic objectives.

For fiscal 2021,operating expenses, the Compensation Committee established goals tied to profitabilitysuspended the Named Executive Officers’ fiscal 2023 EIP participation. Accordingly, no Named Executive Officer received any short-term incentive cash award for fiscal 2023.

Long-Term Incentive Awards Balance Our Drive Towards Continued Technology Leadership and the achievement of certain technology, inventory, product, and cost milestones, and goals focusing on key stakeholders. Please see “Fiscal 2021 Executive Compensation – Fiscal 2021 Short-Term Incentive Awards” for additional detail concerning these goals.

We used a mix of 50% time-based restricted stock and 50% performance-based restricted stock unitsSustained Value Creation.The metrics for our fiscal 2021 long-term equity incentives.

The metrics for our2023 performance-based restricted stock units include the NAND bits shipped or percentage of sales as high value solutionsNAND bits shipped into the data center segment, the DRAM revenue or percentage of revenue from high-growth, stable segments and TSR relative to the semiconductor sector. In addition, there is a technology product engineering samplethe NAND and product qualification sample stretch goal associated withDRAM operational goals together have two additional earnings opportunities relating to the high-value solutions goals. development of next-generation products like high-bandwidth memory and Compute Express Link.

The relative TSRfollowing illustration depicts the amount and high-value solutions goals have a three-year measurement period.
Salary and short-term incentive targets as a percentagemix of base salary did not changepay opportunities for any of our Named Executive Officers for fiscal 2021.2023 after suspension of the EIP, including salaries paid and target long-term incentive opportunities granted for fiscal 2023.



Page 36.jpg

micronnamea.jpg2930 |2023 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents
Shareholder Engagement Shaped Our Response to the Fiscal 2022 Say-on-Pay Vote

At the Fiscal 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders on January 12, 2023, 71% of the votes cast were voted in support of our say-on-pay proposal. While we appreciate that a substantial majority of our holders are supportive of our pay practices, the Compensation Committee viewed this say-on-pay vote outcome as unsatisfactory. Accordingly, it developed a deliberate shareholder outreach effort to understand the concerns that drove shareholders’ say-on-pay voting decisions. See “Shareholder Outreach” on page 13 for details regarding our engagement with shareholders. The Compensation Committee greatly appreciates shareholders’ contributions in these meetings and values the constructive feedback received. In response to the compensation-related feedback we received, we enhanced our disclosures in this Proxy Statement regarding our fiscal 2023 compensation program and we made changes to our fiscal 2024 compensation program as explained in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis section.

The Compensation Committee intends to continue our outreach to shareholders on executive compensation and other matters, and to seek the advice and counsel of its compensation advisors. Our shareholders may communicate any concerns or opinions on executive pay directly to the Compensation Committee or the Board. Please refer to “Executive Sessions and Communications with the Board of Directors” on page 23for information about communicating with the Board.

Fiscal 2024 Compensation Program Changes

After carefully considering the feedback we received from shareholders, we have made several changes to our long-term incentive plan for fiscal 2024. As shown in the infographic below, the changes aim to enhance the pay-for-performance approach of our program and increase the alignment of our executives' incentives with shareholders’ interests. We have also enhanced our disclosures throughout this Compensation Discussion & Analysis to provide greater visibility regarding our short- and long-term incentive programs, and intend to make further enhancements for fiscal 2024 to provide additional details regarding our EIP goals and related results.

Page 32.jpg

micron-logo-black-rgb-75x21.jpg31

Table of Contents
The pay mix for our CEO and other Named Executive Officers (on average) for fiscal 2024 closely mirrors that of 2023.

Page 39.jpg

Executive Compensation Practices

We strive to maintain sound executive compensation practices and policies, which include adherence to the following compensation principles.

Our Compensation Principles

Page 47.jpg

32 |2023 Proxy Statement

Table of Contents
Oversight of the Executive Compensation Program

Each year, the Compensation Committee, advised by its independent compensation consultant, undertakes a rigorous process to review our executive compensation program and determine executive compensation in the context of our pay-for-performance philosophy. The Compensation Committee believes a substantial portion of our executive compensation should be incentive-based and focused on long-term performance to help ensure that the interests of our executive officers are aligned with those of our shareholders. Our primary long-term objective is to drive sustainable value creation for our shareholders by attracting, retaining, developing, and motivating a diverse group of top executive talent through a comprehensive and market-competitive executive compensation program. The Compensation Committee reviews and approves the goals and objectives used to determine executive compensation, evaluates performance in light of such goals and objectives, and determines and approves compensation levels based on that evaluation.

The Compensation Committee annually engages an external compensation consultant and meets with the compensation consultant at least quarterly. The Compensation Committee also works closely with our CEO with respect to the determination of compensation of other officers. A more complete description of the Compensation Committee’s responsibilities is provided in the Compensation Committee’s Charter approved by the Board, which can be found on our website, www.micron.com. A more complete description of the role of the Compensation Committee’s compensation consultant and our CEO in the compensation process is described later in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis. Additional information regarding the Compensation Committee’s compensation consultant, the specific activities it undertakes for us, and its fees can be found under “Compensation-Setting Process and the Determination of Compensation Levels” on page 51.

micron-logo-black-rgb-75x21.jpg33

Table of Contents
Pay-for-Performance Philosophy

Our compensation philosophy for executive officers is based on the belief that the interests of our executives should be closely aligned with our long-term performance and sustainable value creation for our shareholders. To support this philosophy, a large portion of each executive officer’s target total direct compensation is “at risk” and linked to the accomplishment of specific financial and operational performance goals that we expect will lead to increased long-term value creation for our shareholders. The key elements of the compensation that applied to our Named Executive Officers in fiscal 2023 relative to our pay-for-performance philosophy are summarized below.

Page 35.jpg

34 |2023 Proxy Statement

Table of Contents
Targeting “Reasonable” and “Competitive” Pay

We believe that offering a compensation package that is “reasonable” and “competitive” with what our executives could otherwise obtain in the market, and especially from companies within our Compensation Peer Group, enables us to attract, motivate, reward, and retain qualified individuals and to meet our overall objective of increasing shareholder value. Our Compensation Peer Group consists of companies that we believe are especially likely to be our competitors for executive talent and is discussed further in “Market Data Defined” below. The Compensation Committee determines what would be reasonable and competitive compensation based upon an analysis of the Market Data, the recommendations of its compensation consultant, and our historical experience.

Reasonable

The Compensation Committee generally considers the Market Data median to be reasonable. Accordingly, the Market Data median informs the Compensation Committee’s decision-making process, but the Compensation Committee also considers additional factors in establishing each individual’s target compensation levels, including:

differences in position and level of responsibility among officers, both in absolute terms and relative to our other officers and as compared to similarly situated officers within the Compensation Peer Group;

past and anticipated contributions;

technical expertise;

Company performance;

applicable business unit performance; and

length of service and/or experience, both in absolute terms and relative to our other officers and as compared to similarly situated officers within the Compensation Peer Group.

The semiconductor industry is highly volatile. Market Data, which is a compilation of data from many companies provided by the compensation consultant as further described below, may change dramatically from year to year and can evolve as compensation practices change, executives retire or are replaced with less experienced and lower-paid executives, goals are achieved or not achieved resulting in varying payouts, participants in proprietary compensation surveys change, and the completeness or accuracy of compensation data improves or deteriorates. Accordingly, what may have been the median or within a reasonable range of competitiveness in one year, may be higher or lower for the next. For this reason and the factors noted above, even though the Compensation Committee generally uses the Market Data median as its starting point and guiding principle, officer compensation may vary, above or below the median, or a range from the median, year over year.

Competitive

The Compensation Committee believes, including based on advice from its compensation consultant, that a competitive compensation package will address and measure compensation practices for executive positions with respect to three primary elements of compensation:

base compensation (salary);

short-term incentive compensation (cash bonus programs); and

long-term incentive compensation (time-based restricted stock and performance-based restricted stock units).


micron-logo-black-rgb-75x21.jpg35

Table of Contents
We do not require that a particular element comprises a set portion of the target total direct compensation mix. We do believe, however, that a significant portion of the compensation should be variable (such as performance-based incentives and incentives tied to the performance of the Company and its Common Stock) as compared to fixed (such as base salary), and that such variable compensation should align executives’ interests with those of our shareholders. Additionally, although the Compensation Committee reviews total direct compensation (which is the sum of base salary, short-term incentive, and long-term incentive compensation) for each of our Named Executive Officers, it does not have a fixed objective with respect to such target total direct compensation. The Compensation Committee’s philosophy is to use incentive pay opportunities rather than base salary as a way to ensure we are able to attract and retain top talent.

Focus on Top Talent

The Compensation Committee places a strong emphasis on developing, motivating, retaining, and attracting top talent. Such talent is key to the execution of our business strategy and the growth of our business.

Mr. Mehrotra, our President and Chief Executive Officer, has earned more than 70 patents during his 42 years in the semiconductor industry, several of which were foundational to enabling high-capacity flash memory. In November 2023, the Semiconductor Industry Association honored Mr. Mehrotra with the Robert N. Noyce Award, recognizing outstanding achievement and leadership supporting the semiconductor industry. In 2022, Mr. Mehrotra was inducted into the National Academy of Engineering, one of the profession’s highest distinctions. He was awarded an honorary degree from Boise State University in 2022 in recognition of his semiconductor industry leadership. In addition, he received the “Spirit of 1868 Volunteer Award” from the University of California, Berkeley in 2021, the Malaysian Order of Loyal Defender of the State medal in 2021, and the 2019 Flash Memory Summit Lifetime Achievement Award for co-founding SanDisk, advancing the architecture that enabled the industry and market for flash memory, and for his leadership of the Company.

Mr. Murphy, our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, has more than 25 years of experience in executive leadership and finance roles, including roles at companies serving semiconductor materials, semiconductor capital equipment, semiconductor fabrication and assembly and test, and advanced manufacturing for automotive and aerospace. He has successfully led large-scale finance organizations through industry cycles. He is a veteran of the U.S. Marine Corps.

Mr. Bhatia, our Executive Vice President of Global Operations, has more than 25 years of engineering and operations leadership experience with a proven track record of driving semiconductor manufacturing excellence with best-in-class supply chain and quality performance. Mr. Bhatia was awarded the Public Service Medal by the government of Singapore in recognition of his collaborative work on behalf of the Company, which enhanced the country’s economic development.

Dr. DeBoer, our Executive Vice President of Technology and Products, has more than 28 years of experience at the Company where he accumulated extensive technical expertise. Dr. DeBoer’s leadership in delivering memory solutions has been integral to the Company by advancing the scaling of current memory technologies, enabling new memory technologies, and integrating those technologies into memory solutions for all markets. Dr. DeBoer has earned more than 120 patents, many of which were instrumental in today’s DRAM processes and process integration.

Mr. Sadana, our Executive Vice President and Chief Business Officer, has more than 32 years of technology industry experience and currently leads all the Company’s business units as well as overall company strategy, corporate business development and global communications and marketing. Over the course of his career, Mr. Sadana has gained extensive business and technical expertise in roles ranging from chip design, software development, operations management, strategy development and intellectual property licensing, to executive roles such as Chief Technology Officer, Chief Financial Officer and General Manager.

Our Named Executive Officers have been recognized by business, higher education and community-focused organizations for their exceptional leadership, knowledge and contributions to the semiconductor industry.

36 |2023 Proxy Statement

Table of Contents
ComponentsOversight of ourthe Executive Compensation Program


As illustrated inEach year, the table below,Compensation Committee, advised by its independent compensation consultant, undertakes a rigorous process to review our executive compensation program and determine executive compensation in the context of our pay-for-performance philosophy. The Compensation Committee believes a substantial portion of our executive compensation should be incentive-based and focused on long-term performance to help ensure that the interests of our executive officers are aligned with those of our shareholders. Our primary long-term objective is designed to focusdrive sustainable value creation for our shareholders by attracting, retaining, developing, and motivating a diverse group of top executive talent through a comprehensive and market-competitive executive compensation program. The Compensation Committee reviews and approves the goals and objectives used to determine executive compensation, evaluates performance in light of such goals and objectives, and determines and approves compensation levels based on that evaluation.

The Compensation Committee annually engages an external compensation consultant and meets with the longer-termcompensation consultant at least quarterly. The Compensation Committee also works closely with our CEO with respect to the determination of compensation of other officers. A more complete description of the Compensation Committee’s responsibilities is provided in the Compensation Committee’s Charter approved by the Board, which can be found on our website, www.micron.com. A more complete description of the role of the Compensation Committee’s compensation consultant and performance-based componentsour CEO in the compensation process is described later in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis. Additional information regarding the Compensation Committee’s compensation consultant, the specific activities it undertakes for us, and its fees can be found under “Compensation-Setting Process and the Determination of target compensation.
Compensation Component*CharacteristicsPurposeDetermining Factors
Base Salary
ceosalarya.jpg
neosalarya.jpg
Fixed CompensationCompensates executives for performing day-to-day job responsibilitiesMarket Data median sets baseline
Attracts, develops, and retains highly-qualified executive talentAdjusted for executive’s contributions, experience, and performance
Maintains stable management team
Short Term Incentive Pay
ceostia.jpg
neostia.jpg
Variable, performance-based cash compensationProvides performance-based, incentive cash awards for outstanding performance at the individual, business-unit, and/or company-wide levelMarket Data median forms baseline
Target payout is tied to a percentage of executive’s base salaryEncourages accountability by rewarding achievement of specific performance goalsAnnual, pre-determined goals set by the Compensation Committee
Focuses executives on achievement of near-term financial and operational objectives- Net income target
- Achievement of certain technology, inventory, product, and cost milestones and other goals (including environmental sustainability and diversity, equality, and inclusion)
Promotes long-term company success and drives shareholder value
Long Term Incentive Pay
Performance RSUs
ceoprsua.jpg
neoprsua.jpg
Variable, performance-based equity compensationCreates direct, specific alignment with shareholders’ interests by focusing executives on long-term value creation through the achievement of key operational milestones and stock price performanceGoals set by the Compensation Committee
Three-year performance period- Percentage of sales as high value solutions
- TSR relative to the semiconductor sector
- Additional earning opportunities for achievement of stretch product milestones
Earned at the end of the second and third year for the operational goal and each day beginning on the first day of the second year for the financial goal
50% of total banked PRSU vests at end of year 2, remaining and/or incremental vests at end of year 3
Time-Based RSAs
ceorsaa.jpg
neorsaa.jpg
Variable, performance-based equity compensationProvides alignment with shareholder interests by focusing executives on long-term value creationValue based on stock price
Vests ratably over 3 yearsProvides retention value
* The percentages shown for each of the compensation components in the table above are presented based on base salary, target annual STI award, and the annual LTI awards (at the target award values approved by the Compensation Committee) granted to our CEO (on the left) and averaged for all other Named Executive Officers, excluding our CEO (on the right).
Compensation Levels” on page 51.

30 |2021 Proxy Statementmicron-logo-black-rgb-75x21.jpg33


Table of Contents

Pay-for-Performance Philosophy
Consideration
Our compensation philosophy for executive officers is based on the belief that the interests of our executives should be closely aligned with our long-term performance and sustainable value creation for our shareholders. To support this philosophy, a large portion of each executive officer’s target total direct compensation is “at risk” and linked to the accomplishment of specific financial and operational performance goals that we expect will lead to increased long-term value creation for our shareholders. The key elements of the Fiscal 2020 Advisory Vote oncompensation that applied to our Named Executive CompensationOfficers in fiscal 2023 relative to our pay-for-performance philosophy are summarized below.


AtPage 35.jpg

34 |2023 Proxy Statement

Table of Contents
Targeting “Reasonable” and “Competitive” Pay

We believe that offering a compensation package that is “reasonable” and “competitive” with what our executives could otherwise obtain in the Fiscal 2020 Annual Meetingmarket, and especially from companies within our Compensation Peer Group, enables us to attract, motivate, reward, and retain qualified individuals and to meet our overall objective of Shareholders on January 14, 2021,increasing shareholder value. Our Compensation Peer Group consists of companies that we believe are especially likely to be our competitors for executive talent and is discussed further in our annual advisory vote on executive“Market Data Defined” below. The Compensation Committee determines what would be reasonable and competitive compensation 85%based upon an analysis of the votes cast were votedMarket Data, the recommendations of its compensation consultant, and our historical experience.

Reasonable

The Compensation Committee generally considers the Market Data median to be reasonable. Accordingly, the Market Data median informs the Compensation Committee’s decision-making process, but the Compensation Committee also considers additional factors in supportestablishing each individual’s target compensation levels, including:

differences in position and level of responsibility among officers, both in absolute terms and relative to our other officers and as compared to similarly situated officers within the Compensation Peer Group;

past and anticipated contributions;

technical expertise;

Company performance;

applicable business unit performance; and

length of service and/or experience, both in absolute terms and relative to our other officers and as compared to similarly situated officers within the Compensation Peer Group.

The semiconductor industry is highly volatile. Market Data, which is a compilation of data from many companies provided by the compensation consultant as further described below, may change dramatically from year to year and can evolve as compensation practices change, executives retire or are replaced with less experienced and lower-paid executives, goals are achieved or not achieved resulting in varying payouts, participants in proprietary compensation surveys change, and the completeness or accuracy of compensation data improves or deteriorates. Accordingly, what may have been the median or within a reasonable range of competitiveness in one year, may be higher or lower for the next. For this reason and the factors noted above, even though the Compensation Committee generally uses the Market Data median as its starting point and guiding principle, officer compensation may vary, above or below the median, or a range from the median, year over year.

Competitive

The Compensation Committee believes, including based on advice from its compensation consultant, that a competitive compensation package will address and measure compensation practices for executive positions with respect to three primary elements of compensation:

base compensation (salary);

short-term incentive compensation (cash bonus programs); and

long-term incentive compensation (time-based restricted stock and performance-based restricted stock units).


micron-logo-black-rgb-75x21.jpg35

Table of Contents
We do not require that a particular element comprises a set portion of the target total direct compensation mix. We do believe, however, that a significant portion of the compensation should be variable (such as performance-based incentives and incentives tied to the performance of the Company and its Common Stock) as compared to fixed (such as base salary), and that such variable compensation should align executives’ interests with those of our shareholders. Additionally, although the Compensation Committee reviews total direct compensation (which is the sum of base salary, short-term incentive, and long-term incentive compensation) for each of our Named Executive Officers. Officers, it does not have a fixed objective with respect to such target total direct compensation. The Compensation Committee’s philosophy is to use incentive pay opportunities rather than base salary as a way to ensure we are able to attract and retain top talent.

Focus on Top Talent

The Compensation Committee appreciatesplaces a strong emphasis on developing, motivating, retaining, and valuesattracting top talent. Such talent is key to the viewsexecution of our shareholders.business strategy and the growth of our business.

Mr. Mehrotra, our President and Chief Executive Officer, has earned more than 70 patents during his 42 years in the semiconductor industry, several of which were foundational to enabling high-capacity flash memory. In consideringNovember 2023, the resultsSemiconductor Industry Association honored Mr. Mehrotra with the Robert N. Noyce Award, recognizing outstanding achievement and leadership supporting the semiconductor industry. In 2022, Mr. Mehrotra was inducted into the National Academy of Engineering, one of the fiscal 2020 advisory voteprofession’s highest distinctions. He was awarded an honorary degree from Boise State University in 2022 in recognition of his semiconductor industry leadership. In addition, he received the “Spirit of 1868 Volunteer Award” from the University of California, Berkeley in 2021, the Malaysian Order of Loyal Defender of the State medal in 2021, and the 2019 Flash Memory Summit Lifetime Achievement Award for co-founding SanDisk, advancing the architecture that enabled the industry and market for flash memory, and for his leadership of the Company.

Mr. Murphy, our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, has more than 25 years of experience in executive leadership and finance roles, including roles at companies serving semiconductor materials, semiconductor capital equipment, semiconductor fabrication and assembly and test, and advanced manufacturing for automotive and aerospace. He has successfully led large-scale finance organizations through industry cycles. He is a veteran of the U.S. Marine Corps.

Mr. Bhatia, our Executive Vice President of Global Operations, has more than 25 years of engineering and operations leadership experience with a proven track record of driving semiconductor manufacturing excellence with best-in-class supply chain and quality performance. Mr. Bhatia was awarded the Public Service Medal by the government of Singapore in recognition of his collaborative work on behalf of the Company, which enhanced the country’s economic development.

Dr. DeBoer, our Executive Vice President of Technology and Products, has more than 28 years of experience at the Company where he accumulated extensive technical expertise. Dr. DeBoer’s leadership in delivering memory solutions has been integral to the Company by advancing the scaling of current memory technologies, enabling new memory technologies, and integrating those technologies into memory solutions for all markets. Dr. DeBoer has earned more than 120 patents, many of which were instrumental in today’s DRAM processes and process integration.

Mr. Sadana, our Executive Vice President and Chief Business Officer, has more than 32 years of technology industry experience and currently leads all the Company’s business units as well as overall company strategy, corporate business development and global communications and marketing. Over the course of his career, Mr. Sadana has gained extensive business and technical expertise in roles ranging from chip design, software development, operations management, strategy development and intellectual property licensing, to executive compensation, the Compensation Committee concluded that the compensation paid to our executive officersroles such as Chief Technology Officer, Chief Financial Officer and our overall executive pay practices have shareholder support andGeneral Manager.

Our Named Executive Officers have been effective in implementing our stated compensation philosophyrecognized by business, higher education and objectives. The Compensation Committee recognizes that executive pay practicescommunity-focused organizations for their exceptional leadership, knowledge and governance principles continue to evolve. Consequently, we discussed executive compensation and other matters with shareholders throughout fiscal 2021 and intend to continue our outreach to shareholders on executive compensation and other matters. The Compensation Committee also intends to continue to seek the advice and counsel of its compensation advisors. Our shareholders may communicate any concerns or opinions on executive pay directlycontributions to the Compensation Committee or the Boardsemiconductor industry.

36 |2023 Proxy Statement

Table of Directors. Please refer to “Executive Sessions and Communications with the Board of Directors” on page 21 for information about communicating with the Board of Directors.Contents

Oversight of the Executive Compensation Program


Each year, the Compensation Committee, advised by its independent compensation consultant, undertakes a rigorous process to review our executive compensation program and determine executive compensation in the context of our pay-for-performance philosophy. The Compensation Committee believes a substantial portion of our executive compensation should be incentive-based and focused on long-term performance to help ensure that the interests of our executive officers are aligned with those of our shareholders. Our primary long-term objective is to drive sustainable value creation for our shareholders by attracting, retaining, developing, and motivating a diverse group of top executive talent through a comprehensive and market-competitive executive compensation program. The Compensation Committee reviews and approves the goals and objectives used to determine executive compensation, evaluates performance in light of such goals and objectives, and determines and approves compensation levels based on that evaluation.


The Compensation Committee annually engages an outsideexternal compensation consultant.consultant and meets with the compensation consultant at least quarterly. The Compensation Committee also works closely with our CEO with respect to the determination of compensation of other officers. A more complete description of the Compensation Committee’s responsibilities is provided in the Compensation Committee’s Charter approved by the Board, of Directors, which can be found on our website, www.micron.com. A more complete description of the role of the Compensation Committee’s compensation consultant and our CEO in the compensation process is described later in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis. Additional information regarding the Compensation Committee’s compensation consultant, the specific activities it undertakes for us, and its fees can be found under “Compensation-setting“Compensation-Setting Process and the Determination of Compensation Levels” on page 34.51.

micronnamea.jpg31micron-logo-black-rgb-75x21.jpg33

Our Compensation Principles
WHAT WE DOWHAT WE DON’T DO
ü Pay for performance by requiring that a substantial portion of our executives’ compensation be earned based on performance goals
û No special retirement benefits other than participation in our retirement plans on the same basis as other employees
ü Link our compensation program to our long-term corporate growth strategy and key drivers of sustainable shareholder value creation
û No tax gross-ups for change in control pay
ü Use a mix of objective performance measures, cash- and equity-based components, and short- and long-term incentive opportunities that hold our executive officers accountable for executing on our long-term strategy
û No repricing of options or stock appreciation rights without prior shareholder approval
ü Engage an independent compensation consultant to evaluate and advise the Compensation Committee on our compensation program design and pay decisions for our executive officers
û No “single-trigger” vesting for awards
ü Cap maximum payout levels under our incentive plans
û No pledging or hedging activities involving our stock
ü Maintain a compensation recoupment (“clawback”) policy that provides for recoupment of incentive compensation paid to current and former executives in the event of an accounting restatement due to material noncompliance
ü Maintain executive stock ownership guidelines
ü Provide limited perquisites


32 |2021 Proxy Statement


Pay-for-Performance Philosophy


Our compensation philosophy for executive officers is based on the belief that the interests of our executives should be closely aligned with our long-term performance and sustainable value creation for our shareholders. To support this philosophy, a large portion of each executive officer’s target total direct compensation is placed “at risk” and linked to the accomplishment of specific financial and operational performance goals that we expect will lead to increased long-term value creation for our shareholders. The table below summarizes the key elements of the compensation that applied to our Named Executive Officers in fiscal 20212023 relative to our pay-for-performance philosophy.philosophy are summarized below.
Highlights of Our Pay-for-Performance Approach
A substantial majority of the compensation available for executives is performance-based and delivered in the form of equity in order to more closely align management and shareholder interests.
Market Data forms the basis of our compensation targets, with differentiation based on individual factors such as nature of the individual’s role, proficiency in the role, sustained performance over time, and importance to our leadership succession plans.
Incentive awards require achievement of critical financial and operating goals and are primarily measured against objective metrics that we believe result in the creation of sustainable value for our shareholders.
Actual, realized compensation is designed to fluctuate and be commensurate with changes in shareholder value over time.
Performance-based equity, measured by internal and external metrics ultimately aimed at driving shareholder value, comprises a significant portion of our long-term incentives.
The Compensation Committee reviews our pay-for-performance compensation arrangements annually, with input from our CEO and advice from the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant.
Individual performance assessment is based on numerous factors, including among others: contribution to business results and company performance; completion of objectives; behavior consistent with the highest standard of integrity, ethics, and company values; and commitment to sustainability and diversity, equality, and inclusion programs and initiatives.


Page 35.jpg

34 |2023 Proxy Statement

Targeting “Reasonable” and “Competitive” Pay


We believe that offering a compensation package that is “reasonable” and “competitive” with what our executives could otherwise obtain in the market, and especially from companies within our Compensation Peer Group, enables us to attract, motivate, reward, and retain qualified individuals and to meet our overall objective of increasing shareholder value. Our Compensation Peer Group consists of companies that we believe are especially likely to be our competitors for executive talent and is discussed further in “Market“Market Data Defined” below. We determineThe Compensation Committee determines what would be “reasonable”reasonable and “competitive”competitive compensation based upon an analysis of the Market Data, the recommendations of ourits compensation consultant, and our historical experience.


Reasonable


The Compensation Committee generally considers the Market Data median to be “reasonable,”reasonable. Accordingly, the Market Data median informs the Compensation Committee’s decision-making process, but could deviate from such benchmark based on certainthe Compensation Committee also considers additional factors such as:in establishing each individual’s target compensation levels, including:


differences in position and level of responsibility among officers, both in absolute terms and relative to our other officers and as compared to similarly situated officers within the Compensation Peer Group;


past and anticipated contributions;


technical expertise;


Company performance;


applicable business unit performance; and


length of service and/or experience, both in absolute terms and relative to our other officers and as compared to similarly situated officers within the Compensation Peer Group.

micronnamea.jpg33



The semiconductor industry is highly volatile. Market Data, which is a compilation of data from many companies provided by ourthe compensation consultant as further described below, may change dramatically from year to year and can evolve as compensation practices change, executives retire or are replaced with less experienced and lower-paid executives, goals are achieved or not achieved resulting in varying payouts, participants in proprietary compensation surveys change, and the completeness or accuracy of compensation data improves or deteriorates. Accordingly, what may have been the median or within a “reasonable”reasonable range of competitiveness in one year, may be higher or lower for the next. For this reason and the factors noted above, even though the Compensation Committee generally uses the Market Data median as its benchmarkstarting point and guiding principle, officer compensation may vary, above or below the median, or a range from the median, year over year.


Competitive


We believe,The Compensation Committee believes, including based on advice from ourits compensation consultant, that a competitive compensation package will address and measure compensation practices for executive positions with respect to three primary elements of compensation:


base compensation (salary);


short-term incentive compensation (cash bonus programs); and


long-term incentive compensation (time-based restricted stock and performance-based restricted stock units).



micron-logo-black-rgb-75x21.jpg35

We do not require that a particular element comprises a set portion of the target total direct compensation mix. We do believe, however, that a significant portion of the compensation should be variable (such as performance-based incentives and incentives tied to the performance of the Company and its stock)Common Stock) as compared to fixed (such as base salary), and that such variable compensation alignsshould align executives’ interests with those of our shareholders. Additionally, although the Compensation Committee reviews total direct compensation (which is the sum of base salary, short-term incentive, and long-term incentive compensation) for each of our Named Executive Officers, it does not have a fixed objective with respect to such target total direct compensation. The Compensation Committee’s philosophy is to use incentive pay opportunities rather than base salary as a way to ensure we are able to attract and retain top talent.

Focus on Top Talent

The Compensation Committee places a strong emphasis on developing, motivating, retaining, and attracting top talent. Such talent ratheris key to the execution of our business strategy and the growth of our business.

Mr. Mehrotra, our President and Chief Executive Officer, has earned more than 70 patents during his 42 years in the semiconductor industry, several of which were foundational to enabling high-capacity flash memory. In November 2023, the Semiconductor Industry Association honored Mr. Mehrotra with the Robert N. Noyce Award, recognizing outstanding achievement and leadership supporting the semiconductor industry. In 2022, Mr. Mehrotra was inducted into the National Academy of Engineering, one of the profession’s highest distinctions. He was awarded an honorary degree from Boise State University in 2022 in recognition of his semiconductor industry leadership. In addition, he received the “Spirit of 1868 Volunteer Award” from the University of California, Berkeley in 2021, the Malaysian Order of Loyal Defender of the State medal in 2021, and the 2019 Flash Memory Summit Lifetime Achievement Award for co-founding SanDisk, advancing the architecture that enabled the industry and market for flash memory, and for his leadership of the Company.

Mr. Murphy, our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, has more than 25 years of experience in executive leadership and finance roles, including roles at companies serving semiconductor materials, semiconductor capital equipment, semiconductor fabrication and assembly and test, and advanced manufacturing for automotive and aerospace. He has successfully led large-scale finance organizations through industry cycles. He is a veteran of the U.S. Marine Corps.

Mr. Bhatia, our Executive Vice President of Global Operations, has more than 25 years of engineering and operations leadership experience with a proven track record of driving semiconductor manufacturing excellence with best-in-class supply chain and quality performance. Mr. Bhatia was awarded the Public Service Medal by the government of Singapore in recognition of his collaborative work on behalf of the Company, which enhanced the country’s economic development.

Dr. DeBoer, our Executive Vice President of Technology and Products, has more than 28 years of experience at the Company where he accumulated extensive technical expertise. Dr. DeBoer’s leadership in delivering memory solutions has been integral to the Company by advancing the scaling of current memory technologies, enabling new memory technologies, and integrating those technologies into memory solutions for all markets. Dr. DeBoer has earned more than 120 patents, many of which were instrumental in today’s DRAM processes and process integration.

Mr. Sadana, our Executive Vice President and Chief Business Officer, has more than 32 years of technology industry experience and currently leads all the Company’s business units as well as overall company strategy, corporate business development and global communications and marketing. Over the course of his career, Mr. Sadana has gained extensive business and technical expertise in roles ranging from chip design, software development, operations management, strategy development and intellectual property licensing, to executive roles such as Chief Technology Officer, Chief Financial Officer and General Manager.

Our Named Executive Officers have been recognized by business, higher education and community-focused organizations for their exceptional leadership, knowledge and contributions to the semiconductor industry.

36 |2023 Proxy Statement

Components of our Executive Compensation Program

In October 2022, the Compensation Committee set compensation levels and performance goals for fiscal 2023 based on a review of financial results, projections, individual contributions, strategic objectives, Market Data (as defined below), and market conditions. The table below reflects target total direct compensation as initially established for the year (prior to suspension of the EIP) and illustrates our executive compensation program emphasis on longer-term and performance-based variable award opportunities.
Page 38.jpg
The percentages shown for each of the compensation components in the table above are presented based on base salary.salary, target annual STI award, and the annual LTI awards (at the target award values approved by the Compensation Committee) granted to our CEO (on the left) and averaged for all other Named Executive Officers, excluding our CEO (on the right). Percentages of total compensation may not total 100% due to rounding.

micron-logo-black-rgb-75x21.jpg37

Compensation-settingBase Salaries

In October 2022, the Compensation Committee determined to maintain fiscal 2023 base salaries consistent with fiscal 2022 levels. Subsequently, in February 2023, in light of the challenging industry environment, the Compensation Committee determined to reduce salaries for the remainder of fiscal 2023. Specifically, Mr. Mehrotra’s salary was reduced by 20% and other Named Executive Officers’ salaries were reduced by 15%.

Executive OfficerFiscal 2023
Base Salary
Base Salary
% Change From Fiscal 2022
Annualized
Fiscal 2023
Reduced
Base Salary
Annualized Reduced Base Salary
 % Change From Fiscal 2022
Sanjay Mehrotra$1,418,000 0%$1,255,476 (11)%
Mark Murphy700,0000%639,827 (9)%
Manish Bhatia729,7500%667,020 (9)%
Scott DeBoer624,7500%571,046 (9)%
Sumit Sadana782,2500%715,007 (9)%

As discussed under “Short-Term Incentives” below, the Compensation Committee also suspended the EIP in February 2023. The table below illustrates the percentage reduction in our Named Executive Officers’ actual cash compensation between fiscal 2022 and fiscal 2023 as a result of the reduced base salary and EIP suspension.

Executive Officer
Fiscal 2022
Actual Cash Compensation ($)
Fiscal 2023
Target Cash Compensation ($) (Pre-Reduction)
Fiscal 2023
Actual Cash Compensation ($)
Actual Cash Compensation Reduction From Fiscal 2022 (%)
Sanjay Mehrotra$4,845,168 $4,466,700 $1,255,476 (74%)
Mark Murphy(1)843,0931,470,000639,827N/A
Manish Bhatia1,630,1181,532,475667,020(59%)
Scott DeBoer1,325,1711,249,500571,046(57%)
Sumit Sadana1,835,5361,720,950715,007(61%)

(1) No comparison provided for Mr. Murphy whose fiscal 2022 actual total cash compensation reflects partial year salary and EIP payout and includes a $250,000 cash signing bonus.

Short-Term Incentives

Typically, we use the EIP to attract, retain, and reward qualified executives who are important to our success by offering the opportunity to earn cash awards for achieving performance goals set by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee administers the EIP and has the authority to make all decisions and determinations required by the EIP, or as the Compensation Committee deems necessary or advisable to administer the EIP. Due to the challenging nature of the goals set by the Compensation Committee, achievement of EIP goals has historically required significant leadership, effort, and coordination among our leadership team.

Due to the challenging business environment the Company faced in 2023, and as part of a significant program to reduce Company costs and operating expenses, the Compensation Committee suspended the participation of our Named Executive Officers in the EIP for fiscal 2023. Accordingly, no Named Executive Officer received any short-term incentive award for fiscal 2023.

Notwithstanding the suspension of Named Executive Officers’ participation in the EIP during fiscal 2023, in an effort to respond to shareholders’ requests for enhanced disclosure regarding our EIP structure, in this section we discuss both the EIP structure for fiscal 2024 – for which performance will be measured over, and achievement
38 |2023 Proxy Statement

results will be determinable upon completion of, fiscal 2024 – as well as the EIP as it was initially established for fiscal 2023.

Fiscal 2024 Short-Term Incentive Awards

In October 2023, the Compensation Committee established fiscal 2024 performance goals and a short-term incentive compensation opportunity (the “Target Awards”) under the EIP for each Named Executive Officer. These Target Awards were made taking into consideration the Market Data median, among other factors, as part of the Compensation Committee’s efforts to make such opportunities reasonable as described above. The Compensation Committee selected Company Performance goals outlined below based on their correlation to the creation of shareholder value and their alignment with our financial and strategic objectives. The EIP awards will be determined following the end of the fiscal 2024 performance period as follows:

Page 41.jpg

In response to the feedback we have received from shareholders, we are committed to providing full details regarding fiscal 2024 EIP profitability goals, including the threshold - maximum pay opportunities, and detail regarding our actual performance against the profitability and strategic goals, in next year’s proxy statement. See footnote 7 of “Pay Versus Performance” for a description of non-GAAP net income.

Fiscal 2023 Short-Term Incentive Awards

Fiscal 2023 EIP – Establishment and Suspension. In October 2022, the Compensation Committee initially set fiscal 2023 performance goals and Target Awards under the EIP for each Named Executive Officer as follows:


Named Executive Officer
Target Award
(% of Base Salary)
% Change from
 Fiscal 2022
Sanjay Mehrotra215 %0%
Mark Murphy110 %0%
Manish Bhatia110 %0%
Scott DeBoer100 %0%
Sumit Sadana120 %0%
micron-logo-black-rgb-75x21.jpg39

Subsequently, in light of the challenging industry environment and as part of a significant program to reduce Company costs and operating expenses, in February 2023, the Compensation Committee suspended the Named Executive Officers’ fiscal 2023 EIP participation. Accordingly, no Named Executive Officer received or was eligible to receive any short-term incentive cash award for fiscal 2023.

The remainder of this discussion provides information regarding the fiscal 2023 short-term incentive profitability and strategic goals that would have provided bonus payout opportunities under a structure similar to the fiscal 2024 EIP illustrated above had the fiscal 2023 EIP not been suspended. In light of the EIP suspension, we have not included details regarding the EIP profitability goals for fiscal 2023, but as noted above we commit to providing the fiscal 2024 profitability threshold, target and maximum goals, together with the actual performance ultimately achieved against those goals, in next year’s proxy statement. Our strategic goals involve highly confidential, competitively sensitive information, including forward-looking targets and product-specific strategies that if disclosed could cause irreparable competitive harm to us by providing competitors with insight into our internal processes, know-how, products and business initiatives, particularly as many of our goals build on multi-year achievements in order to execute on our overall business strategies. Revealing such information would allow competitors to leverage it to their competitive advantage, to our detriment and the detriment of our shareholders. However, we understand shareholders' desire for additional detail regarding our strategic goals, and have strived to provide greater visibility into the strategic goal components where possible, while balancing these competitive concerns.

Profitability and Strategic Performance Goals. Prior to suspending the EIP, the Compensation Committee established a profitability goal (50% weighting) measured based on the performance of adjusted non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP operating margin and five strategic goal categories (each category with a 10% weighting and together accounting for 50% weighting) for evaluating performance in fiscal 2023. See footnote 7 of “Pay Versus Performance” for a description of non-GAAP net income.

The Compensation Committee chose the profitability and strategic goals based on the following criteria:
Page 42.jpg
The fiscal 2023 profitability goal would have functioned as a gate with respect to any payout based on achievement of the strategic goals discussed below. Specifically, because actual achievement of the profitability goal was below the threshold performance of 50% of target, no payout could have been earned for the EIP had it not been suspended, regardless of the calculated strategic goal achievement. If the profitability goal achievement had resulted in achievement at or above threshold but below target performance, then the overall strategic goals outcome would have been adjusted to the lesser of the profitability goal results and the pre-adjusted strategic goal results.
40 |2023 Proxy Statement


The profitability goal would have required the Company to achieve pre-established fiscal 2023 adjusted non-GAAP net income or non-GAAP operating margin goals. The Compensation Committee intended these goals to be highly rigorous, as even the minimum threshold targets required performance meaningfully above our fiscal year 2023 business plan. Consistent with such approach, based on the Company’s fiscal 2023 adjusted non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP operating margin, the Company would not have achieved the minimum (50% of target) threshold goals. Accordingly, the payout for the profitability goal would have been zero had the Named Executive Officers’ participation in the EIP not been suspended.

The following five strategic goal categories would have accounted for 50% of the overall EIP achievement weighting.

Page 44.jpg

micron-logo-black-rgb-75x21.jpg41

Within each goal category, each strategic goal or group of related strategic goals would have provided an opportunity to achieve performance between the minimum threshold of 50% of target and a maximum of 200% of target.

Achievement of each of the strategic goals included in the five strategic goal categories would have required significant effort and adept execution, and there was no assurance of achievement with respect to any of the metrics or milestones. The Compensation Committee believed that achieving maximum performance for any strategic goal categories would have been challenging and required extraordinary leadership, effort, and coordination as a team. In the past three fiscal years, none of the current strategic goal categories achieved (or would have achieved, for fiscal 2023) maximum performance.

Had the Named Executive Officers’ participation in the EIP for fiscal 2023 not been suspended, the formulaic results of the EIP goals would have been as follows:
Metric
Performance Level Achieved
(% of Targeted Goal)
Profitability (Adjusted non-GAAP Net Income and non-GAAP Operating Margin)0%
Technology and Products138%
Cost140%
Customer156%
Business132%
Environmental, Social and Governance160%
Total Achievement0%

Notwithstanding that the strategic goals were achieved, because the fiscal 2023 EIP design required achieving threshold performance under the profitability goals in order for Named Executive Officers to earn any award, no payouts would have been earned under the EIP had it not been suspended.

Long-Term Equity Incentives

We believe long-term incentive compensation should be tied to our success and help promote increases in long-term shareholder value. Accordingly, performance-based restricted stock unit awards are a significant component of our executive compensation program. We believe these awards are especially aligned with shareholders’ long-term interests because they vest based on achievement of key financial and operational goals and provide an incentive to increase stockholder value because these awards become more valuable to the grantee if our stock price increases. These awards are also intended to help retain key executives and employees as their efforts greatly affect our success as a company.

In fiscal 2023, consistent with the pay-for-performance philosophy underlying our compensation program, the Compensation Committee set the long-term incentive mix at 50% performance-based restricted stock units (“PRSUs”) and 50% time-based restricted stock awards (“RSAs”) for all Named Executive Officers. The Compensation Committee believes that making PRSUs a significant portion of the long-term incentive mix furthers Micron’s pay-for-performance philosophy. For fiscal 2024, the Compensation Committee increased the performance-based weighting of the CEO’s long-term incentive mix to award 65% of the value in PRSUs and 35% in RSAs.

In determining the amount of the long-term equity incentive awards for our Named Executive Officers, the Compensation Committee took into account various data points including (but not limited to) Market Data and information provided by Mr. Mehrotra related to the other officers’ performance and his recommendation as to the amount of their awards. Although the Market Data and Mr. Mehrotra’s recommendations informed the Compensation Committee’s decision, they were not dispositive. The Compensation Committee also considers the other factors described under the section entitled “Reasonable” above when determining long-term equity incentive awards for our Named Executive Officers.

42 |2023 Proxy Statement

The following table shows the intended target value of our Named Executive Officers’ fiscal 2023 long-term equity incentive awards:
Named Executive Officer
Fiscal 2023 Long-Term Equity Incentives(1)
Sanjay Mehrotra$23,750,000 
Mark Murphy7,750,000
Manish Bhatia8,250,000
Scott DeBoer6,500,000
Sumit Sadana8,500,000

(1) Reflects target grant-date fair value.

Based on a review of Market Data, taking into consideration the Market Data median, the Compensation Committee determined that it was appropriate to increase the target award amounts by $250,000 for each Named Executive Officer and $750,000 for Mr. Murphy.

We have not, and do not plan to time the grant of long-term incentive awards (or the award or payment of any other compensation) with the release of material, non-public information. Historically, long-term incentive awards have been made in the first quarter of the fiscal year with the exact grant date corresponding with the date of the approval of the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee generally approves long-term incentive awards granted to the Named Executive Officers on the same day as the grants to other executive officers. For purposes of our equity plans, fair market value is defined as the closing price of our Common Stock as quoted on Nasdaq for the last market-trading day prior to the date of grant.

Certain Goals Involve Highly Confidential Information

As with the strategic goals under our EIP discussed above, the specific targets for our PRSUs awarded based on operational metrics involve highly confidential information that, if disclosed, could cause us irreparable competitive harm. Accordingly, we do not publicly disclose the specific targets for any PRSU awards that utilize operational metrics. However, in this discussion, we have endeavored to provide shareholders with greater visibility into the details of operational PRSU metrics where possible, while remaining mindful of these competitive concerns.

Performance-based RSUs Granted in Fiscal 2023

For fiscal 2023, the Compensation Committee awarded three types of PRSUs:

Metric CategoryNamePerformance MetricPercentage of 2023 PRSU Award Value
Operational2023 DRAM PRSU Awards
DRAM revenue or percentage of DRAM revenue from high-growth, stable segments (automotive, industrial multi-market, networking, data center, and graphics applications)
25%
Operational2023 NAND PRSU Awards
NAND bits shipped or percentage of NAND bits shipped into the data center segment, to drive increased NAND profitability and return on investment (ROI)
25%
Financial2023 rTSR PRSU Award
Relative TSR growth of the Company’s stock price versus the median of the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index.
50%

We refer to the 2023 NAND PRSU Awards and the 2023 DRAM PRSU Awards collectively as the “2023 Operational PRSU Awards,” and, together with the 2023 rTSR PRSU Award, as the “2023 PRSU Awards.”

micron-logo-black-rgb-75x21.jpg43

PRSU awards are eligible to be earned (or “banked”) during the second and third years of the three-year period covering fiscal 2023, 2024, and 2025 (the “Performance Period”) based upon results against performance metrics set at the beginning of the Performance Period. The actual number of PRSUs that will be banked and become eligible to vest under the 2023 PRSU Awards is determined by the product of each Named Executive Officer’s target number of PRSUs and the payout factor that results from actual performance versus pre-established performance metrics (the “Payout Factor”) and is subject to the caps discussed below.

Page 47.jpg

Overall Combined Cap on PRSU Earning and Vesting

The number of PRSUs that each Named Executive Officer may earn under all 2023 PRSU Awards (taken together) during the Performance Period is limited to two times the aggregate target number of PRSUs awarded (the “200% Limit”). As a result, our Named Executive Officers’ ability to earn and vest in the PRSUs is capped at the 200% Limit. 

Each of the two Operational PRSU Awards (2023 DRAM PRSU Awards and 2023 NAND PRSU Awards) represents 25% of the total 2023 PRSU Awards. The Operational PRSU Awards thus account for 50% of the total 2023 PRSU Awards. The maximum number of PRSUs that can be earned based on the actual results for the primary components of each of the Operational PRSU Awards is 200% of the target number of PRSUsawarded for each of the Operational PRSU Awards.

The 2023 rTSR PRSU Award represents the remaining 50% of the total 2023 PRSU Awards1. The maximum number of PRSUs that can be earned for the 2023 rTSR PRSU Award is 150% of the target number of PRSUs awarded for the rTSR PRSU Award.

If the primary components of the Operational PRSU Awards achieve the maximum payout of 200% and the rTSR Award achieves the maximum payout level of 150%, the total 2023 PRSUs earned by each Named Executive Officer will be less than1 175% of the total target PRSUs. The Compensation Committee has approved two additional stretch components of the Operational PRSU Awards that increase the earning opportunity for the Operational PRSU Awards. These stretch components are chosen to be ones whose importance is strategic in nature, whose accomplishment is highly uncertain as the targets represent a stretch from an operational and execution perspective, and whose accomplishment would position the Company very well from a competitive standpoint for the future. Delivering on each of these stretch components will allow recipients of the 2023 PRSU Awards to earn an additional 16.5% of the total 2023 PRSU target award for each of the two stretch components, subject to the overall 200% Limit.
1The actual number of shares granted through the rTSR Award was lower than the number of shares granted for the Operational PRSU Awards due to application of the Monte Carlo valuation approach for the rTSR Award.
44 |2023 Proxy Statement


Achievement of one of these stretch components of the Operational PRSU Awards would add 16.5% to the 175% referenced above, bringing the maximum number of overall total 2023 PRSUs earned to less than1 192% of the total 2023 PRSU target. Achievement of both stretch components, would increase the maximum number of 2023 PRSU Awards to 200% of the total 2023 PRSU target, due to the 200% Limit.

2023 Operational PRSU Awards

The 2023 Operational PRSU Awards tie 50% of each Named Executive Officer target performance-based long-term incentive compensation opportunity to the 2023 DRAM PRSU Awards and 2023 NAND PRSU Awards, as noted above. The 2023 Operational PRSU Awards also have two additional earnings opportunities for stretch components based on product development milestones and targeted product revenue.

Performance for the 2023 DRAM PRSU Awards requires DRAM revenue from high-growth, stable segments (automotive, industrial multi-market, networking, data center, and graphics applications) to exceed a specified absolute threshold or percentage of the total Company DRAM revenue for fiscal year 2024 and fiscal 2025, respectively. Achievement below the threshold will result in no payout. As DRAM revenue from the defined high-growth, stable segments or percentage of total Company DRAM revenue achievement increases above the threshold, payout also increases up to a maximum of 200% of the target number of PRSUs.

Performance for the 2023 NAND PRSU Awards is measured by exceeding a threshold for fiscal year shipments of NAND products, including components and SSDs, into the data center segment (“Data Center NAND”) measured as an absolute number of exabytes shipped or as a percentage of total Company NAND shipments for fiscal 2024 and fiscal 2025, respectively. Achievement below the threshold will result in no payout. As Data Center NAND shipments or percentage of the total Company NAND shipments increase above the threshold, payout also increases up to a maximum of 200% of the target number of PRSUs.

For the 2023 Operational PRSU Awards, the maximum payout for achieving these targets is 200% of the target number of PRSUs under each award, subject to any increases for achieving the additional earning opportunities described below, but capped by the 200% Limit described above. 2023 Operational PRSU Awards do not bank unless performance meets or exceeds the established thresholds. When performance results in achievement above the threshold and between performance levels, the applicable Payout Factor will be determined based on interpolation between performance levels.

In addition, the 2023 Operational PRSU Awards also include two additional earning opportunities tied to stretch components that relate to the development of high bandwidth memory products and associated revenue and Compute Express Link-related products that the Compensation Committee believes would represent significant progress that will enhance long-term shareholder value. Achievement of these additional 2023 Operational PRSU performance conditions increases the number of operational 2023 PRSU Awards earned and requires a significant level of execution and effort. Achievement is subject to the 200% Limit noted above.

Operational PRSU Goals Require Strong Performance. In setting the targets for the 2023 Operational PRSU Awards, the Compensation Committee believed that achievement of these goals at target would require a stretch performance and challenging level of execution and effort on the part of our Named Executive Officers. The established target for DRAM revenue from high-growth, stable segments as a percentage of total Company DRAM revenue set by the Compensation Committee requires performance that is superior to prior fiscal years, including fiscal 2022. The Data Center NAND shipment threshold set by the Compensation Committee for number of exabytes shipped into the data center segment is higher than actual shipments achieved in any prior fiscal year. When the Compensation Committee set the 2023 Operational PRSU Award goals, it believed that achievement of even the threshold level of performance was uncertain. 

Determination of Payout.Achievement levels with respect to the Payout Factor applicable to the 2023 Operational PRSU Awards will be measured at the end of the second and third fiscal years of the Performance Period. No later than 60 days after the end of the second and third fiscal years in the Performance Period (each, a “Certification Date”), the Compensation Committee determines and certifies the resulting Payout Factors for the applicable fiscal year as set forth above. PRSUs that have achieved the requisite performance will become banked.
micron-logo-black-rgb-75x21.jpg45


2023 rTSR PRSU Award

The 2023 rTSR PRSU Award ties 50% of each Named Executive Officer’s target performance-based long-term incentive compensation opportunity to the Company’s share price growth as compared to the TSR of the companies in the SOX index, which is composed of companies primarily involved in the design, distribution, manufacture, and sale of semiconductors, over the three-year Performance Period. The TSR component is measured in year two and year three of the Performance Period. For fiscal 2023, the Compensation Committee set the target goal at the median of the SOX index calculated based on the difference between the Company’s and the median SOX index company’s 60-day average three-year TSR compounded annual growth rate performance. After taking shareholders’ feedback into consideration, the Compensation Committee has increased the fiscal 2024 target to the 55th percentile of the SOX index.

Payout Factor.The Payout Factor for the 2023 rTSR PRSU Award is based on the average of the Company’s three-year rTSR for each of the 60 days trailing the applicable measurement date (inclusive of the measurement date), expressed as a compounded annual growth rate (the “TSR CAGR”), relative to the TSR CAGR (“rTSR CAGR”) of the median company in the SOX index (the “Median SOX Company”). The rTSR CAGRs of the Company versus the Median SOX Company will be measured on each day starting on the first day of fiscal 2024 through the last day of the Performance Period (each, a “measurement date”).

The following table sets forth the levels of rTSR CAGR required to be achieved under the 2023 rTSR PRSU Award to result in the Payout Factors specified below:

rTSR CAGR Achieved on a Measurement DatePayout Factor for the rTSR CAGR
Less than -50 percentage points (“pp”)0%
-50pp (“rTSR Threshold”)50%
0pp (“rTSR Target”)100%
+25pp (“rTSR Maximum”)150%
Greater than +25pp150%

If the rTSR CAGR achieved is between the rTSR Threshold and rTSR Target levels or the rTSR Target and rTSR Maximum levels, the Payout Factor will be determined using interpolation between the applicable levels. For fiscal 2024, the Compensation Committee increased the rTSR Maximum to +50pp so that our payout slope is symmetrical for increases (and decreases) above (and below) the rTSR Target, significantly increasing the level of outperformance required to achieve the rTSR Maximum.
Cap on rTSR PRSUs. The maximum number of rTSR PRSUs that may be earned and vested is equal to 150% of the target number of 2023 rTSR PRSUs granted and is further limited by the total 200% Limit discussed under “Overall Combined Cap on PRSU Earning and Vesting” above. In addition, beginning in fiscal 2024, to further the alignment of the rTSR PRSU Award with shareholders’ experience, payouts will be capped at the rTSR Target in the event that the Company’s absolute TSR is negative, notwithstanding the level of relative performance achieved.

Determination of Payout.As of any measurement date, the number of PRSUs under a 2023 rTSR PRSU Award that are considered banked through such date will equal the product of the Payout Factor determined based on the greatest rTSR CAGR achieved during the Performance Period through such date, and the target number of PRSUs subject to the 2023 rTSR PRSU Award. Accordingly, once PRSUs under a 2023 rTSR PRSU Award become banked on a measurement date (due to achievement of a particular rTSR CAGR level), additional PRSUs can become banked only if a greater rTSR CAGR level is achieved on a later measurement date. Such additional PRSUs banked, if any, will be equal to the excess of the Payout Factor determined using the new, greater rTSR CAGR achieved, over the Payout Factor determined using the next greatest rTSR CAGR previously achieved, multiplied by the target PRSUs subject to the 2023 rTSR PRSU Award. Following completion of each of fiscal 2024 and 2025, the Compensation Committee will certify the extent of achievement of the Payout Factors as set forth above during fiscal 2024 and 2025, respectively.
46 |2023 Proxy Statement


PRSU Vesting

PRSUs will not vest under the 2023 PRSU Awards (if at all) until the Certification Date that immediately follows the end of fiscal 2024, when 50% of PRSUs that have been earned will vest. The remaining 50% of PRSUs earned upon the first Certification Date are banked and will vest upon the second Certification Date that immediately follows the end of fiscal 2025. Any incremental PRSUs that become earned during fiscal 2025 will also vest in full on the second Certification Date, as illustrated below.

Page 45.jpg

If a Named Executive Officer terminates employment with the Company for any reason other than a termination by the Company for cause, any banked shares will continue to vest on the vesting schedule described above. No further PRSUs under the 2023 PRSU Awards will vest following a Named Executive Officer’s termination for cause. For purposes of the 2023 PRSU Awards, “cause” is as defined in the agreement between a Named Executive Officer and the Company governing the terms of such Named Executive Officer’s employment or termination thereof, or if not so defined, as defined in the equity incentive plan under which the award was granted.

Fiscal 2023 PRSUs Achievement

The measurement periods for the 2023 Operational PRSU Awards and the 2023 rTSR PRSU Award do not begin until fiscal 2024. Accordingly, no shares were earned, vested or banked during fiscal 2023 under the 2023 PRSU Awards.

Fiscal 2022 PRSUs Achievement

For fiscal 2022, the Compensation Committee awarded PRSUs (the “2022 PRSU Awards”) as follows:

micron-logo-black-rgb-75x21.jpg47

Metric CategoryNamePerformance MetricPercentage of 2022 PRSU Award Value
Operational2022 Market Segment NAND PRSU AwardsFiscal year shipments of Data Center NAND measured in absolute exabytes and as a percentage of total Company NAND shipments for that fiscal year25%
Operational2022 High-Value NAND PRSU AwardsFiscal year shipments of all NAND bit sales minus consumer components and SpecTek components (“High-Value NAND”) measured as a percentage of total Company NAND shipments for that fiscal year25%
Financial2022 rTSR PRSU AwardRelative TSR growth of the Company’s shares versus the median of the SOX50%

We refer to the 2022 Market Segment NAND PRSU Awards and the 2022 High-Value NAND PRSU Awards collectively as the “2022 Operational PRSU Awards.”

The 2022 rTSR PRSU Award is structured very similarly to the 2023 rTSR PRSU Award except that the applicable performance period is fiscal 2022, 2023 and 2024. Thus, the 2022 rTSR PRSU Award (as with the 2023 awards) provide for the earning and banking or vesting of shares based on the Company’s share price growth as compared to the median TSR of the companies in the SOX index over a three-year performance period. The rTSR goals and potential payout factors are the same as shown above in the table for the 2023 rTSR PRSU Award (with the exception of the applicable performance period).

For the 2022 Market Segment NAND PRSU Awards, separate thresholds apply for each of fiscal year 2023 and 2024 for both absolute exabytes and percentage of total NAND bits shipped. For the 2022 High-Value NAND PRSU Awards, thresholds apply for the percentage of total NAND bits shipped. Achievement below the threshold will result in no payout.

In addition to the Data Center NAND and High-Value NAND performance metrics, the 2022 Operational PRSU Awards also include two additional earning opportunities tied to performance conditions relating to the development of high bandwidth memory products and associated revenue, Compute Express Link-related products, and leading-edge DRAM products that the Compensation Committee believes represent significant progress that will enhance long-term shareholder value. Each of these two additional 2022 Operational PRSU performance conditions may increase the number of the 2022 PRSU Awards earned, although total 2022 PRSU Award payouts may not exceed the 200% Limit noted above. Achievement of the additional performance conditions requires a significant level of execution.

PRSU Payout Formula

For each of the PRSU Awards we granted for fiscal years 2021, 2022 and 2023, a Payout Factor (that varies based on actual performance versus the goals and that may be zero, resulting in no payout) is used to determine the number of shares that are earned and banked (but not necessarily vested).

48 |2023 Proxy Statement

Page 51.jpg

In October 2023, the Compensation Committee reviewed the Company’s performance relative to the 2022 PRSU Award metrics and applied the applicable 2022 Payout Factors. This review was the first measurement year provided under the 2022 PRSU Awards; the final measurement will be performed following fiscal year 2024.
The Compensation Committee determined that the Company’s performance versus the goals as of the end of fiscal year 2023 was as follows:

Fiscal 2022 PRSU Award Payout Factors
Operational - 50% WeightFinancial - 50% Weight
High-Value NANDMarket Segment NAND
Additional
Performance Conditions
rTSR CAGR
Fiscal YearActual ResultPayout FactorActual ResultPayout FactorActual ResultPayout FactorActual ResultPayout Factor
2023below threshold0%below threshold0%Achieved high bandwidth memory revenue goal33%-7ppts93%

Performance also will be measured after the end of fiscal 2024 and additional shares may be earned, although there is no guarantee any additional shares will be earned. Following the completion of fiscal year 2024, the Company intends to provide additional information regarding the goals, their achievement, and whether additional shares were earned.

micron-logo-black-rgb-75x21.jpg49

The Compensation Committee certified that the following shares had been earned and vested or banked by our Named Executive Officers under the 2022 PRSU Awards:

FY22
High-Value NAND Shares
FY22
Market Segment NAND Shares
FY22
rTSR Shares
ExecutiveEarned for FY23VestedBankedEarned for FY23VestedBankedEarned for FY23VestedBanked
Sanjay Mehrotra14,5297,2647,26514,5297,2647,26568,77034,38534,385
Mark Murphy7,4303,7153,7157,4303,7153,71534,76517,38217,383
Manish Bhatia4,9462,4732,4734,9462,4732,47323,41111,70511,706
Scott DeBoer3,8641,9321,9323,8641,9321,93218,2899,1449,145
Sumit Sadana5,1002,5502,5505,1002,5502,55024,14312,07112,072

Fiscal 2021 PRSUs Achievement

For fiscal 2021, the Compensation Committee awarded PRSUs under performance metrics that measure relative TSR growth (the “2021 rTSR PRSU Award”) and the percentage of bits shipped as part of certain high-value NAND products (the “2021 High-Value NAND PRSU Award” and, together with the 2021 rTSR PRSU Award, the “2021 PRSU Awards”), each representing 50% of the total target PRSU opportunity for each Named Executive Officer. The 2021 rTSR PRSU Award had the same design as the 2023 rTSR PRSU Award and the 2022 rTSR PRSU Award, except that the performance period for the 2021 rTSR PRSU Award was fiscal 2021, 2022 and 2023.

Performance for the 2021 High-Value NAND PRSU Award required exceeding a threshold with respect to percentage of NAND bits shipped as High-Value NAND, then meeting certain incremental pre-established targets to achieve increased payouts, subject to a maximum payout of 200%.

In addition, the 2021 High-Value NAND PRSU Award also included two additional earnings opportunities tied to performance conditions relating to achievement of targeted high bandwidth memory revenue and 3DXP solutions revenue that the Compensation Committee believed represented significant progress that would enhance long-term shareholder value. Each of the two additional performance conditions could have increased the number of 2021 NAND PRSU Awards earned, although the total 2021 PRSU Award payouts may not have exceeded the 200% Limit. The additional performance conditions were not achieved and therefore did not impact the 2021 High-Value NAND PRSU Award earned.

In October 2022 and October 2023, the Compensation Committee reviewed the Company’s actual performance relative to the 2021 PRSU Award metrics and applied the applicable 2021 Payout Factors. Actual results and the Payout Factors as certified by the Compensation Committee were as follows:

Fiscal 2021 PRSU Award Payout Factors
OperationalFinancial
High-Value NANDrTSR CAGR
Fiscal YearActual ResultPayout FactorActual ResultPayout Factor
2022above maximum200%-8ppts92%
2023N/AN/A-7ppts93%
Total Combined Payout200%93%

Based on these actual results and Payout Factors, the Compensation Committee certified that a number of incremental shares were earned and vested in fiscal 2023 under the 2021 PRSU Awards, as set forth in the table below. The table also indicates the number of shares previously earned and either vested or banked based on fiscal 2022 performance.

50 |2023 Proxy Statement

Executive(1)FY21 NANDFY21 rTSR
Shares Earned & Vested in FY22Shares Banked in FY22 & Vested in FY23Incremental Shares Earned & Vested for FY23Total Shares Earned & VestedShares Earned & Vested in FY22Shares Banked in FY22 & Vested in FY23Incremental Shares Earned & Vested for FY23Total Shares Earned & Vested
Sanjay Mehrotra89,04589,045— 178,09034,61034,61175269,973
Manish Bhatia28,87928,879— 57,75811,22511,22524422,694
Scott DeBoer24,06624,066— 48,132 9,3549,35420418,912
Sumit Sadana31,28631,286— 62,57212,16012,16126424,585

(1)Mr. Murphy joined the Company in April 2022 and, as a result, did not receive any 2021 PRSU Awards

Time-Based RSAs

Time-based restricted stock awards (“RSAs”) support retention and are linked to shareholder value and ownership. Annual RSAs granted in fiscal 2023 over three years from the date of grant, with one third vesting on the first anniversary date of grant and the remainder vesting ratably in eight quarterly installments, subject to continued employment. In fiscal 2023, RSAs comprised 50% of the target value of the long-term incentive awards granted.

Compensation-Setting Process and the Determination of Compensation Levels


The Compensation Committee reviews the compensation of our executive officers on an annual basis and sets compensation levels at the beginning of each fiscal year. As part of this process, the Compensation Committee reviews our financial results for the year just ended, projections for future periods, our strategic business plan, and the Market Data provided by ourits compensation consultant. The Compensation Committee also works with our CEO to establish performance goals that further our strategic objectives.


Engagement of Compensation Consultant


The Compensation Committee annually engages a compensation consultant to provide a comprehensive review of executive compensation matters.matters and meets with the compensation consultant at least quarterly. This compensation consultant provided the Compensation Committee with information for our executive officers on cash and non-cash compensation elements and historical and trend payment data.


The Compensation Committee has established procedures intended to keep its compensation consultant’s advice to the Compensation Committee objective and free of influence from our management. These procedures include: a direct reporting relationship to the Compensation Committee; a provision in the Compensation Committee’s engagement letter with the compensation consultant specifying what information, data, and recommendations can be shared with management; and an annual update to the Compensation Committee on the compensation consultant’s relationship with the Company, including a summary of the work performed during the preceding 12 months. For fiscal 2021,2023, the specific activities undertaken by the compensation consultant for the Compensation Committee included:


34 |2021 Proxy Statement


review the Compensation Peer Group (as defined in thethis Compensation Discussion and Analysis) and recommend any changes to its members;


benchmarkevaluate target total target direct compensation and its components (salary,(base salary, target short-term incentives, and target long-term incentives) of our executive officers using several data sources;


evaluate our historical pay-for-performance“pay-for-performance” relationship;


review the metrics and targets associated with the annual short-term incentives and long-term incentive compensation plans;

micron-logo-black-rgb-75x21.jpg51


review the proposed equity grants for executives,awards to be granted to our executive officers, along with vesting recommendations;


assist with a risk assessment of our compensation policies and practices;


review a draft of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis componentsection of our definitive proxy statement disclosure;statement; and


attend the Compensation Committee meetings in which executive compensation matters are discussed.


Compensia, Inc. (“Compensia") was the Compensation Committee’s compensation consultant in fiscal 2021. We paid Compensia a total of $140,539 in fiscal 2021 for services provided.2023. Compensia provided services related exclusively to the executive and non-employee director compensation consulting work performed for the Compensation Committee and for the Governance and Sustainability Committee.


The Compensation Committee considered Compensia’s independence in light of SEC rules and Nasdaq Listing Rules. The Compensation Committee received a letter from Compensia addressing its independence, including the following factors: (i) other services provided to us by them; (ii) fees paid by us as a percentage of their total annual revenue; (iii) policies or procedures maintained by them that are designed to prevent a conflict of interest; (iv) any business or personal relationships between the individual consultants involved in the engagement and any member of the Compensation Committee; (v) whether the individual consultants involved in the engagement owned shares of our Common Stock; and (vi) any business or personal relationships between our executive officers and them or the individual consultants involved in the engagement. The Compensation Committee concluded that there were no conflicts of interest with Compensia.


“Market Data” Defined


Each year, ourThe Compensation Committee, with assistance from the management team (including our CEO)support of Compensia, reviews and Compensia, identifies a group of peer companies to use as benchmarks when setting target pay levels (our “Compensation Peer Group”). With input and advice from our compensation consultant,approves the Compensation Committee reviews our Compensation Peer Group annually to ensure that it reflects industry or economic changes suchand core selection criteria. Our current criteria includes comparable revenue and market capitalization size; industry, with a focus on semiconductor companies and other broad technology industry companies that are market leaders in their space; as changes inwell as other talent competitors and companies with similar business strategies, operations, product lines, revenues, or availability of key talent. Historically, the Compensation Committee’s peer selection process focused primarily on the semiconductor industry and revenue size.strategies.


Our Compensation Peer Group for fiscal 2021 is2023 was comprised of the following 16 companies, which we believe are companies with which we are likely to compete for executive talent. In consultation with Compensia, the Compensation Committee did not make any changes to the Compensation Peer Group for fiscal 2021.2023.

micronnamea.jpg3552 |2023 Proxy Statement


Page 55.jpg
For fiscal 2021, our Compensation Peer Group was as follows:
Adobe Inc.Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Applied Materials, Inc.Broadcom Inc.
Cisco Systems, Inc.Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company
IBMIntel Corporation
Lam Research CorporationNVIDIA Corporation
QUALCOMM CorporationSalesforce.com, Inc.
Seagate TechnologyTexas Instruments Incorporated
VMware, Inc.Western Digital Corporation

Compensation Peer Group Data


Compensia gathers data from the proxy statements publishedpublicly filed by our Compensation Peer Group and from published compensation surveys. The relevant survey and Compensation Peer Group data for fiscal 2021,2023, each as discussed below, were weighted equally by the Compensation Committee and are collectively referred to throughout this discussionCompensation Discussion and Analysis as the “Market Data.”


When collecting and assessing market compensation data, we collectCompensia collects data based on job descriptions first. This permits the Compensation Committee to match positions held by our executives with those of our Compensation Peer Group and, as described more fully below, deviate from benchmarked datathe Market Data based on the factors described earlier. If we arethe Compensation Committee is not able to match positions to a reasonable number of companies within the Compensation Peer Group, we lookit looks to the rank of the person involved and matchmatches ranks, e.g., our third-highest paid executive officer could be compared to the third-highest paid executive officer at each company within the Compensation Peer Group.


micron-logo-black-rgb-75x21.jpg53

Compensation Survey Data


SurveyCompensation survey data may vary from year to year. For fiscal 2021, our2023, the compensation consultant used the Radford Global Technology Survey and information obtained from public filings by the Compensation Peer Group. We believe these surveys arethis survey is particularly relevant for high-technologytechnology companies given the high level of participation by such companies in the survey.


Compensation-Setting ProcessTime-Based RSAs


Compensia reviewsTime-based restricted stock awards (“RSAs”) support retention and are linked to shareholder value and ownership. Annual RSAs granted in fiscal 2023 over three years from the most recent available datadate of grant, with one third vesting on the first anniversary date of grant and identifies the Market Data values for the 25th, 50th (i.e., median), and 75th percentile with respectremainder vesting ratably in eight quarterly installments, subject to each position or rank, then compares our compensation data, both as to elements and amounts to be paid or potential value to be delivered, with thatcontinued employment. In fiscal 2023, RSAs comprised 50% of the Market Data and reports its findings totarget value of the CEOlong-term incentive awards granted.

Compensation-Setting Process and the Determination of Compensation Committee. Our CEO works with Compensia by providing our financial data with respect to the most-recently completed fiscal year. The CEO also reviews projected financial results for the current fiscal year and our strategic business plan. For all Named Executive Officers other than himself, the CEO makes suggestions as to base salary, recommends a potential set of company-wide and/or business unit metrics and targets for the current fiscal year with respect to short-term incentives, and offers suggestions as to long-term incentive compensation. He makes no recommendations as to his own level of compensation. Levels

The Compensation Committee reviews the Market Data, discussescompensation of our executive officers on an annual basis and sets compensation levels at the beginning of each fiscal year. As part of this process, the Compensation Committee reviews our financial results for the year just ended, projections for future periods, our strategic business plan, and the Market Data with the CEO and with Compensia, discusses individual officer performance based on input from the CEO and, without the CEO present, discusses the CEO’s own performance for the most-recently completed fiscal year and anticipated performance for the current year.provided by its compensation consultant. The Compensation Committee usesalso works with our CEO to establish performance goals that further our strategic objectives.

Engagement of Compensation Consultant

The Compensation Committee annually engages a compensation consultant to provide a comprehensive review of executive compensation matters and meets with the Market Data and the deliberations to determine whether our compensation is competitive and reasonable as described above and whether, and to what extent,consultant at least quarterly. This compensation consultant provided the Compensation Committee believeswith information for our executive officers on cash and non-cash compensation elements and historical and trend payment data.

The Compensation Committee has established procedures intended to keep its compensation consultant’s advice objective and free of influence from our management. These procedures include: a direct reporting relationship to the Compensation Committee; a provision in the Compensation Committee’s engagement letter with the compensation consultant specifying what information, data, and recommendations can be shared with management; and an annual update to the Compensation Committee on the compensation consultant’s relationship with the Company, including a summary of the work performed during the preceding 12 months. For fiscal 2023, the specific activities undertaken by the compensation consultant for the Compensation Committee included:

review the Compensation Peer Group (as defined in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis) and recommend any changes to its members;

evaluate target total direct compensation and its components (base salary, target short-term incentives, and target long-term incentives) of our executive officers using several data sources;

evaluate our historical “pay-for-performance” relationship;

review the metrics and targets associated with the annual short-term incentives and long-term incentive compensation plans;
micron-logo-black-rgb-75x21.jpg51


review the proposed equity awards to be granted to our executive officers, along with vesting recommendations;

assist with a risk assessment of our compensation policies and practices;

review a draft of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of our definitive proxy statement; and

attend the Compensation Committee meetings in which executive compensation matters are discussed.

Compensia, Inc. (“Compensia") was the Compensation Committee’s compensation consultant in fiscal 2023. Compensia provided services related exclusively to the executive and non-employee director compensation consulting work performed for the Compensation Committee and for the Governance and Sustainability Committee.

The Compensation Committee considered Compensia’s independence in light of SEC rules and Nasdaq Listing Rules. The Compensation Committee received a letter from Compensia addressing its independence, including the following factors: (i) other services provided to us by them; (ii) fees paid by us as a percentage of their total annual revenue; (iii) policies or procedures maintained by them that are designed to prevent a conflict of interest; (iv) any business or personal relationships between the individual consultants involved in the engagement and any member of the Compensation Committee; (v) whether the individual consultants involved in the engagement owned shares of our Common Stock; and (vi) any business or personal relationships between our executive officers and them or the individual consultants involved in the engagement. The Compensation Committee concluded that there were no conflicts of interest with Compensia.

“Market Data” Defined

The Compensation Committee, with the support of Compensia, reviews and approves the Compensation Peer Group annually to ensure that it would be appropriatereflects industry or economic changes and core selection criteria. Our current criteria includes comparable revenue and market capitalization size; industry, with a focus on semiconductor companies and other broad technology industry companies that are market leaders in their space; as well as other talent competitors and companies with similar business strategies.

Our Compensation Peer Group for fiscal 2023 was comprised of the following 16 companies, which we believe are companies with which we are likely to compete for executive talent. In consultation with Compensia, the Compensation Committee did not make any changes to the Compensation Peer Group for fiscal 2023.

52 |2023 Proxy Statement

Page 55.jpg

Compensation Peer Group Data

Compensia gathers data from the proxy statements publicly filed by our Compensation Peer Group and from published compensation surveys. The relevant survey and Compensation Peer Group data for fiscal 2023, each as discussed below, were weighted equally by the Compensation Committee and are collectively referred to throughout this Compensation Discussion and Analysis as the “Market Data.”

When collecting and assessing market compensation data, Compensia collects data based on job descriptions first. This permits the Compensation Committee to match positions held by our executives with those of our Compensation Peer Group and, as described more fully below, deviate from the Market Data and competitive practices. Following this deliberation,based on the factors described earlier. If the Compensation Committee exercises its business judgmentis not able to certifymatch positions to a reasonable number of companies within the paymentCompensation Peer Group, it looks to the rank of compensation based on the financial results forperson involved and matches ranks, e.g., our third-highest paid executive officer could be compared to the most-recently completed fiscal year, and approvesthird-highest paid executive officer at each company within the compensation for the current fiscal year, including the metrics and targets for the current year.Compensation Peer Group.

36 |2021 Proxy Statementmicron-logo-black-rgb-75x21.jpg53

Fiscal 2021 Executive Compensation Survey Data


Fiscal 2021 Base Salaries

At the completion of fiscal 2020, Market Data showed that the base salaries of Messrs. Zinsner, DeBoer, and Sadana were below the 50th percentile for their positions or ranks, and the base salaries of Mr. Bhatia and Mr. Mehrotra were above the 50th and 75th percentiles, respectively, for their positions or ranks. The Compensation Committee decided notsurvey data may vary from year to increase the base pay for each of our Named Executive Officers to align with the Company’s decision to delay team member base pay increases in light of economic uncertainty relating to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Executive OfficerFiscal 2021 Base SalaryBase Salary % Change From Fiscal 2020
Sanjay Mehrotra$1,350,000 %
David A. Zinsner662,000 %
Manish Bhatia695,000 %
Scott J. DeBoer595,000 %
Sumit Sadana745,000 %

Fiscal 2021 Short-Term Incentive Awards

We provided annual short-term incentive cash awards to our executive officers pursuant to the EIP. The EIP was last approved by our shareholders in January 2018. The purpose of the EIP is to attract, retain, and reward qualified executives who are important to our success, by providing performance-based, incentive cash awards for outstanding performance at the individual and/or company-wide level. In fiscal 2021, the Compensation Committee set the short-term incentive “opportunity” (“Target Award”) for each Named Executive Officer in terms of a specified percentage of such officer’s base salary.

The target incentive amounts payable under the EIP for achievement of the fiscal 2021 goals are shown in the columns “Estimated Future Payouts under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards” of the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2021” table. All goals were established with threshold (50%), target (100%), exceptional (150%), and maximum (200%) payout levels, with the threshold, target, exceptional, and maximum payouts requiring a significant level of execution and effort and no assurance of goal achievement.

Target Awards established for fiscal 2021 for our Named Executive Officers, as a percentage of base salary, were measured against the Market Data median, as part of the Compensation Committee’s efforts to make such opportunities “Reasonable” as described above. Though the Market Data median is instructive, the Compensation Committee also considers the other factors described under the section labeled “Reasonable” above when determining Target Awards for our Named Executive Officers.year. For fiscal 2021,2023, the following Target Awards were established, and were unchanged from fiscal 2020:
Executive Officer% of Base Salary
Sanjay Mehrotra200 %
David A. Zinsner100 %
Manish Bhatia100 %
Scott J. DeBoer100 %
Sumit Sadana110 %

micronnamea.jpg37


The Compensation Committee established a profitability goal and five operational metrics for evaluating performance in fiscal 2021, which includes performance on sustainability issues including labor practices, health and safety, environmental issues including climate change and water, and management systems:

profitability (50% weighting);
achievement of targeted levels of inventory (10% weighting)
achievement of certain product milestones (including sales of certain NAND and DRAM products as a percentage of total sales, growth of certain channel sales, and revenue from emerging technologies) (10% weighting);
execution to, and acceleration of, our technology roadmap (objective criteria/milestones related to NAND and DRAM), with an additional stretch goal for exceptional performance (10% weighting, plus potential stretch goal);
continued increases in our cost competitiveness (10% weighting); and
achievement of certain milestones focusing on customers and other key stakeholders (10% weighting), including:
customer quality ranking, delivery performance, and customer business review;
environmental sustainability (Process GHG emissions abatement, transition to renewables (vPPA / PPA); water restoration efforts; and increasing waste reuse, recycle, recovery (RRR)%); and
diversity, equality and inclusion (increasing representation of underrepresented groups at the new hire and senior leader levels; pay equity for underrepresented groups; increasing the inclusion index score in the Company’s engagement survey; and all team members completing one ally training session during fiscal 2021).

The Compensation Committee chose these metrics and their linkage to our business and results of operations because they believe:

performance against these metrics enhances shareholder value and rewards operational excellence that positions the Company for better long-term performance;
a focus on sustainability benefits our team members, communities, and other stakeholders;
a balanced weighting limits the likelihood of rewarding executives for taking excessive risk;
including a target encourages the pursuit of profitable revenue and strong margins; and
using different measures avoids paying for the same performance twice.

Shortly after the fiscal year concluded, the Compensation Committee reviewed and determined the Company’s performance against these corporate metrics, applied the percentage of achievement to plan and weighted the results according to the weightings established at the beginning of the year. After applying this formula, the Compensation Committee considered each Named Executive Officer’s performance over fiscal 2021 and established a final EIP payout for fiscal 2021. Our Named Executive Officers received EIP bonuses in the following amounts in fiscal 2021:
Executive OfficerBonus Paid
Sanjay Mehrotra$4,800,600 
David A. Zinsner1,177,036 
Manish Bhatia1,235,710 
Scott J. DeBoer1,057,910 
Sumit Sadana1,457,071 

Fiscal 2021 Long-Term Equity Incentives

We believe long-term incentive compensation should be tied to our success and promote increases in shareholder value. Accordingly, performance-based restricted stock unit awards are a significant component of our executive compensation program. We believe these awards are especially aligned with shareholders’ interests as their value is dependent upon the achievement of key operational milestones or stock price performance. To
38 |2021 Proxy Statement


help retain executives, we also grant time-based restricted stock awards. The Compensation Committee reviews peer data related to the mix and types of long-term incentive awards and works with its independent compensation consultant to determineused the allocation and type of performance- and time-based awards to grant each fiscal year.

In fiscal 2021, the Compensation Committee set the long-term incentive mix at 50% performance-based restricted stock units (“PRSUs”) and 50% time-based restricted stock awards. The Compensation Committee believes that a high percentage of PRSUs emphasizes Micron’s strong pay-for-performance philosophy underlying our executive compensation program.

In determining the amount of the long-term equity incentive awards for our Named Executive Officers, the Compensation Committee reviewed Market DataRadford Global Technology Survey and information provided by Mr. Mehrotra related to the other officers’ performance and his recommendation as to the amount of their awards. For information on Mr. Mehrotra’s long-term equity incentive, please see the discussion below on CEO compensation. The following table shows the value of our Named Executive Officers’ fiscal 2021 long-term equity incentives:
Named Executive OfficerFiscal 2021 Long-Term Equity Incentives(1)
Sanjay Mehrotra$18,500,000 
David A. Zinsner5,000,000 
Manish Bhatia6,000,000 
Scott J. DeBoer5,000,000 
Sumit Sadana6,500,000 
(1)Reflects target grant-date fair value.

We have not, and do not plan to time the grant of long-term incentive awards (or the award or payment of any other compensation) with the release of material, non-public information. Historically, long-term incentive awards have been made in the first quarter of the fiscal year with the exact grant date corresponding with the date of the meeting of the Compensation Committee. Historically, long-term incentive grants to the Named Executive Officers are approvedobtained from public filings by the Compensation Committee onPeer Group. We believe this survey is particularly relevant for technology companies given the same day as the grants to other executive officers. For purposes of our equity plans, fair market value is defined as the closing price as quoted on Nasdaq for the last market-trading day prior to the date of grant.

Performance-based RSUs Granted in Fiscal 2021

PRSUs support the Compensation Committee’s desire to link realized value to the Company’s long-term success and help align executive compensation with shareholder interests. For fiscal 2021, the Compensation Committee awarded PRSUs under performance metrics that measure the percentage of bits shipped as part of a high-value solution (the “2021 High-Value Solutions PRSU Award”) and relative total shareholder return (TSR) growth (the “2021 TSR PRSU Award”). The achievement of these awards requires a significanthigh level of execution and effort and there is no assurance of goal achievement.

PRSU awards are eligible to be earned (or “banked”) during the second and third years of the three-year period covering fiscal 2021, 2022, and 2023 (the “Performance Period”) based upon results against performance metrics set at the beginning of the Performance Period. The actual number of PRSUs that will be banked and become eligible to vest under the 2021 High-Value Solutions PRSU Award and the 2021 TSR PRSU Award (together the “2021 PRSU Awards”) is determinedparticipation by reference to each Named Executive Officer’s target number of PRSUs and the payout factor that results from actual performance versus pre-established performance metrics (the “Payout Factor”), and is subject to the caps discussed below.

The number of PRSUs that each Named Executive Officer may earn under all 2021 PRSU Awards (taken together) during the Performance Period will not exceed two times the aggregate target number of PRSUs covered by all of a Named Executive Officers’ 2021 PRSU Awards (the “2x Limit”). As a result, our Named Executive Officers’ ability to earn and vest any PRSUs is capped at the 2x Limit. Additionally, the maximum award
micronnamea.jpg39


of PRSUs may not exceed 5,000,000 shares of our Common Stock in any one calendar year to any one participant, as provided in the applicable equity incentive plan.

2021 High-Value Solutions PRSU Award

The 2021 High-Value Solutions PRSU Award ties 50% of each Named Executive Officer’s target performance-based long-term incentive opportunity to the achievement of certain percentages of products shipped as high-value solutions, with two additional earnings opportunities for stretch goals based on product development milestones.

Performance is measured by exceeding a threshold, then meeting certain prescribed targets, subject to a maximum payout. The maximum payout for achieving such targets is 200% of the target number of PRSUs under the award, subject to any increases for achieving the stretch milestones described below but capped by the 2x Limit described further above. 2021 High-Value Solutions PRSU Awards do not bank unless performance meets or exceeds the established threshold. When performance results in achievement above the threshold and between performance levels, the applicable Payout Factor will be determined based on interpolation between performance levels.

In addition, the 2021 Payout Factors with respect to the 2021 High-Value Solutions PRSU Award may be increased upon achievement of two stretch milestones relating to revenues that the Compensation Committee believes represent significant progress in the development of next-generation products that will enhance long-term shareholder value.

Determination of Payout

Achievement levels with respect to the Payout Factor applicable to a 2021 High-Value Solutions PRSU Award are measured at the end of each applicable fiscal year of the Performance Period. No later than 60 days after the end of each fiscal year in the Performance Period (each, a “Certification Date”), the Compensation Committee determines and certifies the resulting Payout Factors for the applicable fiscal year as set forth above. PRSUs that have achieved the requisite performance become banked.

Vesting

PRSUs do not vest under the 2021 High-Value Solutions PRSU Award until the Certification Date that immediately follows the end of fiscal 2022, when 50% of the then-unvested banked PRSUs (for the avoidance of doubt, inclusive of any PRSUs becoming banked PRSUs as of such Certification Date) will vest. Remaining banked PRSUs and/or incremental PRSUs that become banked PRSUs will vest as of the Certification Date that immediately follows the end of fiscal 2023. If the Named Executive Officer terminates employment with the Company for any reason other than a termination by the Company for cause, any banked shares will continue to vest on the vesting schedule described above. No further PRSUs under the 2021 High-Value Solutions PRSU Award will vest following the Named Executive Officer’s termination for cause. For purposes of the 2021 High-Value Solutions PRSU Award, cause is as defined in the agreement between the Named Executive Officer and the Company governing the terms of such Named Executive Officer’s employment or termination thereof, or if not so defined, as defined in the equity incentive plan under which the award was granted.

2021 TSR PRSU Award

The 2021 TSR PRSU Award ties 50% of each Named Executive Officer’s target performance-based long-term incentive opportunity to the Company’s share price growth as compared to the median total shareholder return of the companies in the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index (SOX) over the three-year Performance Period. For fiscal 2021, the Compensation Committee set the target goal at the median of the SOX index, which is composed of companies primarily involved in the design, distribution, manufacture, and sale of semiconductors, calculated based on the difference between the Company’s and the median SOX index company’s 60-day average three-year TSR compounded annual growth rate performance.survey.


40 |2021 Proxy Statement


Payout Factor

The Payout Factor for the 2021 TSR PRSU Award is based on the average of the Company’s three-year total shareholder return for each of the 60 days trailing the applicable measurement date (inclusive of the measurement date), expressed as a compounded annual growth rate (the “TSR CAGR”), relative to the TSR CAGR of the median company in the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index (SOX) (the “Median SOX Company”). The relative TSR (“rTSR”) CAGRs of the Company versus the Median SOX Company (the “rTSR CAGR”) will be measured on each day starting on the first day of fiscal 2022 through the last day of the Performance Period (each, a “measurement date”).

The following table sets forth the levels of rTSR CAGR required to be achieved under a 2021 TSR PRSU Award to result in the Payout Factors specified below:
rTSR CAGR Achieved on a Measurement DatePayout Factor for the rTSR CAGR
Less than -50 percentage points (“pp”)0.0x
-50pp (“rTSR Threshold”)0.5x
0pp (“rTSR Target”)1.0x
+25pp (“rTSR Maximum”)1.5x
Greater than +25pp1.5x
If the rTSR CAGR achieved is between the rTSR Threshold and rTSR Target levels or the rTSR Target and rTSR Maximum levels, the Payout Factor will be determined using interpolation between the applicable levels.

Cap on PRSU Earning and Vesting
The maximum number of PRSUs that may vest is equal to 150% of the target number of PRSUs granted under the 2021 TSR PRSU Award (subject to the total 2x Limit cap discussed under “Performance-based RSUs Granted in Fiscal 2021” above).

Determination of Payout
As of any measurement date, the number of PRSUs under a 2021 TSR PRSU Award that are considered banked through such date will equal the product of the Payout Factor determined based on the greatest rTSR CAGR achieved during the Performance Period through such date, and the target number of PRSUs subject to the 2021 TSR PRSU Award. Accordingly, once PRSUs under a 2021 TSR PRSU Award become banked on a measurement date (due to achievement of a particular rTSR CAGR level), additional PRSUs can become banked only if a greater rTSR CAGR level is achieved on a later measurement date. Such additional PRSUs banked, if any, will be equal to the excess of the Payout Factor determined using the new, greater rTSR CAGR achieved, over the Payout Factor determined using the next greatest rTSR CAGR previously achieved, multiplied by the target PRSUs subject to the 2021 TSR PRSU Award. Following completion of each of fiscal 2022 and 2023, the Compensation Committee will certify the extent of achievement of the Payout Factors as set forth above during fiscal 2022 and 2023, respectively (an “rTSR Certification”).

Vesting

On the date of the first rTSR Certification (following fiscal 2022), 50% of any PRSUs that have been certified as banked through the date of such rTSR Certification will vest. On the date of the second rTSR Certification (following fiscal 2023), the remaining 50% of PRSUs that were certified as banked upon the first rTSR Certification, and 100% of any additional PRSUs that are certified as banked for achievement of a greater Payout Factor during the remainder of the Performance Period after the first rTSR Certification, will vest. If the Named Executive Officer terminates employment with the Company for any reason other than a termination by the Company for cause, any banked shares also will continue to vest on the vesting schedule described above. No further PRSUs under the 2021 TSR PRSU Award will vest following the Named Executive Officer’s termination for cause. For purposes of the 2021 TSR PRSU Award, cause is as defined in the agreement between the Named Executive Officer and the Company governing the terms of such Named Executive Officer’s employment or
micronnamea.jpg41


termination thereof, or if not so defined, as defined in the equity incentive plan under which the award was granted.

Fiscal 2021 PRSUs Achievement

The measurement periods for the 2021 High-Value Solutions PRSU Award and the 2021 TSR PRSU Award do not begin until fiscal 2022. Accordingly, no shares were banked during fiscal 2021 under the 2021 PRSU Awards.

Fiscal 2020 PRSUs Achievement

For fiscal 2020, the Compensation Committee awarded PRSUs under performance metrics that measure TSR growth (the “2020 TSR PRSU Award”) and the percentage of bits shipped as part of a high value solution (the “2020 High-Value Solutions PRSU Award”), with the 2020 TSR PRSU Award and the 2020 High-Value Solutions PRSU Award each representing 50% of the total target PRSU opportunity for each Named Executive Officer. In October 2021, the Compensation Committee reviewed the Company’s performance relative to the 2020 PRSU Award metrics, applied the applicable 2020 Payout Factors, and certified that the following shares had been banked by our Named Executive Officers under the 2020 PRSU Awards:
Shares Banked for Fiscal 2021 Performance under 2020 TSR PRSU Award
2020 TSR PRSU Award16,589 

Named Executive OfficerShares Banked for Fiscal 2021 Performance under 2020 TSR PRSU AwardShares Vested under 2020 TSR PRSU Award
Sanjay Mehrotra7,483 3,741 
David A. Zinsner1,996 998 
Manish Bhatia2,494 1,247 
Scott J. DeBoer1,871 935 
Sumit Sadana2,745 1,372 


Shares Banked for Fiscal 2021 Performance under 2020 High-Value Solutions Award
2020 High-Value Solutions Award— 


Named Executive OfficerShares Banked for Fiscal 2021 Performance under 2020 High-Value Solutions PRSU AwardShares Vested under 2020 High-Value Solutions PRSU Award (for performance during Fiscal 2020)
Sanjay Mehrotra— 141,251 
David A. Zinsner— 37,667 
Manish Bhatia— 47,084 
Scott J. DeBoer— 35,313 
Sumit Sadana— 51,791 

Fiscal 2019 PRSUs Achievement

For fiscal 2019, the Compensation Committee awarded PRSUs under performance metrics that measure cumulative adjusted free cash flow, the percentage of bits shipped as part of a high value solution, and forward
42 |2021 Proxy Statement


price-to-earnings ratio (the “2019 PRSU Award Metrics”). In October 2021, the Compensation Committee reviewed the Company’s performance relative to the 2019 PRSU Award Metrics, applied the applicable payout factors, and concluded that no conditions for the lapsing of restrictions were achieved during fiscal 2021.

Time-Based RSAs


Time-based restricted stock awards (“RSAs”) support retention and are linked to shareholder value and ownership. Annual RSAs vest ratablygranted in fiscal 2023 over three years from the date of grant, with one third vesting on the first anniversary date of grant and the remainder vesting ratably in eight quarterly installments, subject to continued employment. In fiscal 2021,2023, RSAs comprised 50% of the target value of the long-term incentive awards granted.


Compensation-Setting Process and the Determination of Compensation Levels

The Compensation Committee reviews the compensation of our executive officers on an annual basis and sets compensation levels at the beginning of each fiscal year. As part of this process, the Compensation Committee reviews our financial results for the year just ended, projections for future periods, our strategic business plan, and the Market Data provided by its compensation consultant. The Compensation Committee also works with our CEO to establish performance goals that further our strategic objectives.

Engagement of Compensation Consultant

The Compensation Committee annually engages a compensation consultant to provide a comprehensive review of executive compensation matters and meets with the compensation consultant at least quarterly. This compensation consultant provided the Compensation Committee with information for our executive officers on cash and non-cash compensation elements and historical and trend payment data.

The Compensation Committee has established procedures intended to keep its compensation consultant’s advice objective and free of influence from our management. These procedures include: a direct reporting relationship to the Compensation Committee; a provision in the Compensation Committee’s engagement letter with the compensation consultant specifying what information, data, and recommendations can be shared with management; and an annual update to the Compensation Committee on the compensation consultant’s relationship with the Company, including a summary of the work performed during the preceding 12 months. For fiscal 2023, the specific activities undertaken by the compensation consultant for the Compensation Committee included:

review the Compensation Peer Group (as defined in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis) and recommend any changes to its members;

evaluate target total direct compensation and its components (base salary, target short-term incentives, and target long-term incentives) of our executive officers using several data sources;

evaluate our historical “pay-for-performance” relationship;

review the metrics and targets associated with the annual short-term incentives and long-term incentive compensation plans;
micron-logo-black-rgb-75x21.jpg51


review the proposed equity awards to be granted to our executive officers, along with vesting recommendations;

assist with a risk assessment of our compensation policies and practices;

review a draft of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of our definitive proxy statement; and

attend the Compensation Committee meetings in which executive compensation matters are discussed.

Compensia, Inc. (“Compensia") was the Compensation Committee’s compensation consultant in fiscal 2023. Compensia provided services related exclusively to the executive and non-employee director compensation consulting work performed for the Compensation Committee and for the Governance and Sustainability Committee.

The Compensation Committee considered Compensia’s independence in light of SEC rules and Nasdaq Listing Rules. The Compensation Committee received a letter from Compensia addressing its independence, including the following factors: (i) other services provided to us by them; (ii) fees paid by us as a percentage of their total annual revenue; (iii) policies or procedures maintained by them that are designed to prevent a conflict of interest; (iv) any business or personal relationships between the individual consultants involved in the engagement and any member of the Compensation Committee; (v) whether the individual consultants involved in the engagement owned shares of our Common Stock; and (vi) any business or personal relationships between our executive officers and them or the individual consultants involved in the engagement. The Compensation Committee concluded that there were no conflicts of interest with Compensia.

“Market Data” Defined

The Compensation Committee, with the support of Compensia, reviews and approves the Compensation Peer Group annually to ensure that it reflects industry or economic changes and core selection criteria. Our current criteria includes comparable revenue and market capitalization size; industry, with a focus on semiconductor companies and other broad technology industry companies that are market leaders in their space; as well as other talent competitors and companies with similar business strategies.

Our Compensation Peer Group for fiscal 2023 was comprised of the following 16 companies, which we believe are companies with which we are likely to compete for executive talent. In consultation with Compensia, the Compensation Committee did not make any changes to the Compensation Peer Group for fiscal 2023.

52 |2023 Proxy Statement

Page 55.jpg

Compensation Peer Group Data

Compensia gathers data from the proxy statements publicly filed by our Compensation Peer Group and from published compensation surveys. The relevant survey and Compensation Peer Group data for fiscal 2023, each as discussed below, were weighted equally by the Compensation Committee and are collectively referred to throughout this Compensation Discussion and Analysis as the “Market Data.”

When collecting and assessing market compensation data, Compensia collects data based on job descriptions first. This permits the Compensation Committee to match positions held by our executives with those of our Compensation Peer Group and, as described more fully below, deviate from the Market Data based on the factors described earlier. If the Compensation Committee is not able to match positions to a reasonable number of companies within the Compensation Peer Group, it looks to the rank of the person involved and matches ranks, e.g., our third-highest paid executive officer could be compared to the third-highest paid executive officer at each company within the Compensation Peer Group.

micron-logo-black-rgb-75x21.jpg53

Compensation Survey Data

Compensation survey data may vary from year to year. For fiscal 2023, the compensation consultant used the Radford Global Technology Survey and information obtained from public filings by the Compensation Peer Group. We believe this survey is particularly relevant for technology companies given the high level of participation by such companies in the survey.

Compensation-Setting Process

Compensia reviews the most recent available data and identifies the Market Data values for the 25th, 50th (i.e., median), and 75th percentile with respect to each position or rank, then compares our compensation data, both as to elements and amounts to be paid or potential value to be delivered, with that of the Market Data and reports its findings to the CEO and the Compensation Committee. The CEO works with Compensia by providing our financial data with respect to the most-recently completed fiscal year. The CEO also reviews projected financial results for the current fiscal year and our strategic business plan. For all Named Executive Officers other than himself, the CEO makes suggestions as to base salary, recommends a potential set of company-wide and/or business unit metrics and targets for the current fiscal year with respect to short-term incentives, and offers suggestions as to long-term incentive compensation. He makes no recommendations as to his own level of compensation. The Compensation Committee reviews the Market Data, discusses the Market Data with the CEO and with Compensia, discusses individual executive officer performance based on input from the CEO and, without the CEO present, discusses the CEO’s own performance for the most-recently completed fiscal year and anticipated performance for the current year. The Compensation Committee uses the Market Data and the deliberations to determine whether our compensation is competitive and reasonable as described above and whether, and to what extent, the Compensation Committee believes it would be appropriate to deviate from the Market Data and competitive practices. Following these deliberations, the Compensation Committee exercises its business judgment to certify the payment of compensation based on the financial results for the most-recently completed fiscal year, and approves the compensation for the current fiscal year, including the metrics and targets for the current fiscal year.

Consideration of Tax Consequences when Making Compensation Decisions

Code Section 162(m) generally disallows a tax deduction to public companies such as Micron for annual compensation over $1,000,000 per person paid to our Named Executive Officers and certain other current or former executive officers. Although the Compensation Committee considers the deductibility of compensation under Section 162(m), it reserves the right to grant or approve compensation or awards that may be non-deductible when it believes such compensation or awards are in our and our shareholders’ best interests.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

We have established stock ownership guidelines for our executive officers. The Compensation Committee believes that our executive officers will more effectively manage the Company in the best interests of the shareholders if they are also shareholders. The minimum ownership guideline for our CEO is to hold shares with a value equal to five times his base salary. Messrs. Murphy, Bhatia, DeBoer, and Sadana are required to hold shares with a value equal to three times their base salary. Executive officers are given five years to meet the ownership guidelines. The Governance and Sustainability Committee reviews the stock ownership guidelines periodically and monitors each covered executive’s progress toward, and continued compliance with, the guidelines. Stock sales restrictions may be imposed upon executive officers if the stock ownership guidelines are not met. All our executive officers are in compliance with the guidelines.
Page 56.jpg
54 |2023 Proxy Statement

The following table shows compliance with the guidelines as of fiscal 2023 year-end:

Executive OfficerGuideline Multiplier
Guideline
Amount(1)
Compliance with Guideline
Sanjay Mehrotra5$5,672,000 Yes
Mark Murphy31,785,000 Yes
Manish Bhatia31,860,863 Yes
Scott DeBoer31,593,113 Yes
Sumit Sadana31,994,738 Yes

(1) Based on the reduced base salary amounts as of the fiscal 2023 year-end.

Compliance is based on ownership (either directly in their name or jointly or separately by a spouse, children or trusts) of fully vested shares obtained through previous equity awards, unvested time-based equity awards and shares purchased on the open market.

Please see page 26 for information on stock ownership guidelines for our directors.

Compensation Recoupment (Clawback) Policy

We maintain a compensation recoupment (clawback) policy, which we recently amended and restated effective in September 2023 for compliance with the listing standards of Nasdaq. In the event that the Company is required to prepare an accounting restatement due to its material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement under U.S. securities law, the policy provides that the Company will recoup compensation from each current or former executive officer who, during the three-year period preceding the date on which a restatement is required, received compensation from incentive awards based on the erroneous financial data that exceeds the amount of incentive-based compensation the executive would have received based on the restatement. The Compensation Committee has sole discretion to determine how to seek recovery under the policy and may forgo recovery if it determines that recovery would be impracticable and either the cost of recovery would exceed the amount sought to be recovered, or that recovery would violate a home-country law that was adopted prior to November 28, 2022 or would cause an otherwise tax-qualified retirement plan broadly available to our employees to fail to meet applicable tax qualification requirements.

Other Fiscal 20212023 Employee Benefits


We provide a competitive level of time-off, health, life, disability, and retirement benefits to substantially all employees. The Named Executive Officers are eligible to participate in the same such plans as our other employees. Executive perquisites are minor in scope and amount, and therefore are

In addition, we also pay for personal security arrangements for Mr. Mehrotra. We do not consideredconsider personal security measures to be material elementsa personal benefit to Mr. Mehrotra, but instead appropriate expenses for the benefit of compensation.








micronnamea.jpg43


CEO Compensation

The following charts show one-year relative TSR data, three-year relative TSR data,the Company that arise out of his employment responsibilities and CEO compensation for usthat are necessary to his job performance and our Compensation Peer Group. The information presented into ensure the one-year TSR chart below is based on closing pricessafety of our Common Stock on September 2, 2020,Mr. Mehrotra and September 2, 2021, and represents the rates of return of our Common Stock reflecting price appreciation plus reinvestment of any dividends and the compounding effect of any dividends paid on reinvested dividends. The information presented in the three-year TSR chart below is based on closing prices of our Common Stock on August 31, 2018, and September 2, 2021, and represents the rates of return of our Common Stock reflecting price appreciation plus reinvestment of any dividends and the compounding effect of any dividends paid on reinvested dividends.

a1yrtsr_2021a.jpg

a3yrtsr_2021a.jpg


The CEO pay information presented in the chart below represents peer compensation data via proxy statements presentedhis family. In determining to authorize these security arrangements, the Compensation Committee in September 2020.evaluated the need to respond to specific incidents and threats, and reviewed recommendations from a leading independent security firm. In addition, the Compensation Committee has established a policy to review personal security costs quarterly. The 50th percentile presented inSecurity Committee also has an annual process for oversight of the charts below represents total target direct compensation (i.e.,nature of security measures and will discontinue, adjust, or enhance security as appropriate.

In the suminterests of base salary, target short-term incentive,safety, security, and target long-term incentive compensation).

44 |2021 Proxy Statement


ceopayrank_2021a.jpg

efficiency, the Compensation Committee has authorized Mr. Mehrotra to use the Company's aircraft for personal travel. The Compensation Committee considered this data and Market Data in setting Mr. Mehrotra’s total target direct compensationalso has established a policy to review costs for fiscal 2021.use of Company aircraft for personal travel on a quarterly basis.


Mr. Mehrotra’s compensation is comprised of the following elements:

Base Salary

Mr. Mehrotra’s base salary for fiscal 2021 was $1,350,000. Market Data showed that Mr. Mehrotra’s base salary was above the 75th percentile for CEOs in our Compensation Peer Group.

Short-Term Incentive

Mr. Mehrotra’s short-term incentive target was 200% of his base salary for fiscal 2021. Market Data showed that a short-term incentive of 200% of base salary was at the 60th percentile for CEOs in our Compensation Peer Group.

Long-Term Equity Incentive

Mr. Mehrotra’s long-term equity incentive opportunity for fiscal 2021 was $18,500,000. Mr. Mehrotra’s equity awards were comprised of 50% time-based restricted stock and 50% performance-based restricted stock units. Market Data showed that Mr. Mehrotra’s long-term equity incentive was between the 60th and 75th percentile for our Compensation Peer Group.

micronnamea.jpg45


The following table sets forth the elements and amounts of Mr. Mehrotra’s long-term incentive awards:
Fiscal 2021 AwardsNumber of Options/ Shares(1)Grant Date Fair Value(1)
Time-based Restricted Stock178,090 $9,249,995 
Performance-based Restricted Stock Units(2)164,285 9,250,000 
342,375 $18,499,995 
(1)Information related to Mr. Mehrotra’s long-term incentive award is also included in the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2021” table. The time-based share amounts are listed in the column “All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units,” and the performance-based share amounts are listed in the column “Estimated Future Payouts under Equity Incentive Plan Awards.” The values included in those tables reflect the grant-date fair value under U.S. GAAP.
(2)Mr. Mehrotra banked 7,483 shares based on achievement of the 2021 Performance Metrics. Please see “– Fiscal 2021 Executive Compensation – Fiscal 2021 Long-Term Equity Incentives” above.

Other Compensation

The Compensation Committee agreed to reimburse Mr. Mehrotra for commuting expenses, and federal, state, and other income taxes resulting from imputed income related to his commuting expenses. See footnote 46 to the Fiscal 2021 Summary Compensation Table for additional information.

micron-logo-black-rgb-75x21.jpg55


Severance and Change in Control ArrangementsArrangements


Severance Agreements


President and Chief Executive Officer


At the time of his hire, we entered into an executive agreement with Mr. Mehrotra (the “Executive Agreement”) providing for severance benefits in certain circumstances. The Executive Agreement provides that if Mr. Mehrotra’s employment is terminated (i) as result of his death or “disability,” (ii) by us without “cause” or (iii) as a result of Mr. Mehrotra’s resignation for “good reason,” then in addition to receiving his accrued base salary, accrued vacation pay, and other earned and vested employee benefits, Mr. Mehrotra will receive the following severance benefits:


salary continuation equal to two times Mr. Mehrotra’s salary in effect upon the date of termination paid in installments during the one-year period following termination (or paid in a lump sum if Mr. Mehrotra’s termination of employment occurs on, or within 12 months after, a “change“Change in control”Control”);


a pro-rated annual bonus under the EIP for the year of termination, subject to achievement of applicable performance criteria, paid in accordance with the terms of the EIP;


an additional bonus of two times Mr. Mehrotra’s target annual bonus under the EIP for the year of termination paid on the one-year anniversary of Mr. Mehrotra’s termination;


continued vesting (and exercisability) of any options, restricted stock or other time-based, and, subject to achievement of applicable performance criteria, performance-based equity awards for the one-year period following Mr. Mehrotra’s termination of employment; and


a cash payment equal to the medicaladditional cost of COBRA for continuation of benefits Mr. Mehrotra would have incurred and the employer qualified plan matching contributions Mr. Mehrotra would have received had Mr. Mehrotra remained employeda participant for an additional two years, paid in a lump sum following termination.


If Mr. Mehrotra’s severance benefits become payable on account of his “good reason” resignation prior to a “change“Change in control”Control” and Mr. Mehrotra becomes employed within one year of his termination of employment, the
46 |2021 Proxy Statement


unpaid portion of his salary continuation benefit will be forfeited. The Executive Agreement also includes a “cut-back” provision, which provides that Mr. Mehrotra’s benefits under the Executive Agreement will be reduced so that no excise tax will apply under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time (the “Code”), if such reduction will result in a higher net after-tax benefit to Mr. Mehrotra. The Executive Agreement does not provide a tax gross-up for any such tax. Mr. Mehrotra’s entitlement to the benefits provided under the Executive Agreement are conditioned on Mr. Mehrotra signing a release of claims in favor of Micron and on Mr. Mehrotra’s compliance with terms of our non-competition, non-solicitation, and non-disclosure agreement.


Other Named Executive Officers


Each of our other Named Executive Officers havehas a severance agreementsagreement (together, the “NEO“Named Executive Officer Severance Agreements”). The NEONamed Executive Officer Severance Agreements provide for severance benefits upon certain terminations of employment. These benefits begin upon a “separation of service” as defined in Section 409A of the Code, regardless of when a termination of employment or loss of officer status occurs, and ends after one year (or 18 months if termination occurs on or within 12 months offollowing a changeChange in control)Control). We believe severance agreements for certain of our officers are in the best interests of us and our shareholders, in that they help us attract and retain qualified executive talent, promote candid discussion among our officers, help provide for a smooth transition when there is a change in management, provide the officer with benefits in consideration of a promise not to compete with us after termination of employment, and release us, and our officers, directors, employees, and agents from any and all claims.


56 |2023 Proxy Statement

Provided a Named Executive Officer complies with post-employment obligations and restrictions described below and all other terms of the Named Executive Officer Severance Agreement, the Named Executive Officer is entitled to receive compensation during the 12- or 18-month period following termination of employment equivalent to the compensation and benefits customarily provided to such Named Executive Officer while employed including, but not limited to, salary, executive bonus, and in certain cases, continued vesting of outstanding stock options and restricted shares.equity awards, and amounts with respect to 401(k) plan matching contributions and COBRA premiums. With respect to cash and equity awards that are performance-based, the Named Executive Officer is entitled to receive such awards only if the goals are achieved before or during the 12- or 18-month period following termination of employment. Such terminatedTerminated Named Executive Officers are not entitled to receive any new awards under our equity plans or the EIP or to the payment of any compensation that would be deferred past the 12- or 18-month period following termination of employment due to payment criteria of an incentive program, as those criteria exist as of the date of termination. Notwithstanding the discussion above, the Named Executive Officer Severance Agreement for Dr. DeBoer that was in place for fiscal 2023 did not provide for enhanced benefits upon separation in connection with a Change in Control. The Named Executive Officer Severance Agreements for Messrs. Murphy, Bhatia and Sadana provide that upon certain terminations of employment on or within 12 months following a Change in Control, all of the Named Executive Officer’s outstanding stock options and restricted equity awards will be treated as vested and earned. Mr. Bhatia’s severance agreementMurphy’s Named Executive Officer Severance Agreement also provides for accelerationthat in connection with certain terminations of employment any unvested shares granted in connection withas part of his hiring, with any shares that remain unvestednew hire equity award will continue to vest at the end ofsame time and in the 12- or 18-month period following termination of employment becoming 100% vested and earned onsame amounts as if he had remained an employee through the last day of such period.applicable vesting date.


Terminated Named Executive Officers are subject to the following post-termination obligations and restrictions:


a one-year non-competition obligation;

confidentiality obligations related to our proprietary and confidential information that last indefinitely;

a non-disparagement and confidentiality obligation surrounding the reasons for, and circumstances of, the Named Executive Officer’s termination of employment or change in officer status that lasts indefinitely. However, we may disclose such information if we determine, in our sole discretion, it is either required by law to be disclosed or necessary to be disclosed to serve a valid business purpose; and

non-solicitation and non-interference provisions relating to our employees and business partners that last at least one year.


Upon receipt of all benefits under the NEONamed Executive Officer Severance Agreement, we and the Named Executive Officer are considered to have settled, waived, and voluntarily released any and all claims each has or may have against the other, inclusive of any of our affiliates, officers, directors, employees or agents, both individually and in their official capacities, which claims are accruing prior to the end of the 12- or 18-month period following termination of employment.


micronnamea.jpg47micron-logo-black-rgb-75x21.jpg57

We entered into an amended and restated Severance Agreement with Dr. DeBoer after the close of our fiscal 2023. In contrast to the agreement with Dr. DeBoer in effect during fiscal 2023, which is described above, the amended and restated Severance Agreement:

clarifies that a qualifying termination that entitles Dr. DeBoer to severance is limited to a termination by us without “cause” or a resignation by Dr. DeBoer for “good reason”;
caps at fiscal 2023 levels (prior to reduction) the salary and target bonus used to determine the compensation payable to Dr. DeBoer during the 12-month period following termination of employment in the event of a qualifying termination in the absence of a “Change in Control”;
provides that, in the event of Dr. DeBoer’s retirement, any such severance payments will be pursuant to a consulting agreement that will terminate upon Dr. DeBoer’s return from retirement;
provides that, in the event of Dr. DeBoer’s qualifying termination upon or within 12 months following a “Change in Control”, Dr. DeBoer will vest in full in his outstanding unvested options, with any unresolved performance conditions deemed to be met at target levels.

Estimated Severance Payments


See “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” on page 5769 for a description of the estimated severance amounts as of the end of fiscal 20212023 for Messrs. Mehrotra, Zinsner,Murphy, Bhatia, DeBoer, and Sadana. Any cash severance amounts that would be payable to our executive officers are subject to the Executive Officer Cash Severance Policy described below.


Executive Officer Cash Severance Policy

In October 2023, we adopted an Executive Officer Cash Severance Policy that does not allow the Company to enter into any new employment agreement, severanceagreement or separation agreement with any executive officer – or establish any new severance plan or policy covering any executive officer – that provides for cash severance benefits exceeding 2.99 times the sum of the executive officer’s base salary plus target annual bonus opportunity, without seeking shareholder ratification of such arrangement. In addition, the Executive Officer Cash Severance Policy provides that any cash payments that may be owed under any existing agreement, plan or policy with an executive officer that was in place prior to adoption of the policy will be reduced as necessary to not exceed the 2.99 times limit unless shareholder ratification is obtained. The Executive Officer Cash Severance Policy is administered by the Compensation Committee, including full authority to interpret and enforce such policy.

Change in Control Arrangements


We do not have separate changeChange in controlControl agreements for our Named Executive Officers and directors. The Executive Agreement and the NEONamed Executive Officer Severance Agreements referenced above provide for transitional benefits in the event of termination of employment, including following a changeChange in control.Control. In addition, under the terms of our EIP and our equity compensation plans, awards may be substituted, assumed, or accelerated upon a changeChange in control,Control, depending upon the circumstances. Our equity plans provide for “double-trigger” vesting provisions in the event of a changeChange in control.Control. As a result, if awards are assumed by a successor in connection with a changeChange in control,Control, such awards will not automatically vest and pay out solely as a result of the changeChange in control.Control. Instead, vesting for such awards will only vestaccelerate if within one year after the effective date of the changeChange in control,Control, the participant’s employment is terminated without cause or, in the case of certain participants including our Named Executive Officers, if the participant resigns for good reason. The compensation that Named Executive Officers could receive if a changeChange in controlControl occurs is intended to enable them to objectively evaluate whether a potential changeChange in controlControl is in the best interest of us and our shareholders. EstimatedThe estimated value that the Named Executive Officers could receive from our changeChange in controlControl provisions can be found in “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” on page 57.

Consideration of Tax Consequences when Making Compensation Decisions

Section 162(m) generally disallows a tax deduction to public companies such as Micron for annual compensation over $1,000,000 per person paid to our Named Executive Officers and certain other current or former executive officers. Prior to fiscal 2019, qualifying performance-based compensation was not subject to the deduction limit if certain requirements were met. The key components of our long-term incentives in the form of stock option grants and performance-based restricted stock unit awards were designed to comply with these requirements. Awards under the EIP also generally were designed to comply with the statute. A number of requirements must be met for particular compensation to qualify, however, there can be no assurance that such compensation will be fully deductible under all circumstances. Although the Compensation Committee considers the deductibility of compensation under Section 162(m), it reserves the right to grant or approve compensation or awards that may be non-deductible when it believes such compensation or awards are in our and our shareholders’ best interests.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

We have established stock ownership guidelines for our executive officers. The Compensation Committee believes that officers will more effectively manage a company in the best interests of the shareholders if they are also shareholders. The minimum ownership guideline for our CEO is to hold shares with a value equal to five times his base salary. Messrs. Zinsner, Bhatia, DeBoer, and Sadana are required to hold shares with a value equal to three times their base salary. Executive officers are given five years to meet the ownership guidelines. The Governance and Sustainability Committee reviews the Ownership Guidelines annually and monitors each covered executive’s progress toward, and continued compliance with, the guidelines. Stock sales restrictions may be imposed upon executive officers if the stock ownership guidelines are not met. All our executive officers are in compliance with the guidelines.

69.
48 58 |20212023 Proxy Statement

The following table shows compliance with the guidelines as of the Record Date:
Executive OfficerGuideline MultiplierGuideline Amount(1)Compliance with Guideline
Sanjay Mehrotra5$7,090,000 Yes
David A. Zinsner32,144,880 Yes
Manish Bhatia32,189,250 Yes
Scott J. DeBoer31,874,250 Yes
Sumit Sadana32,346,750 Yes
(1)Based on salary amounts as of the Record Date.

Please see page 23 for information on stock ownership guidelines for our directors.



COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT


The material in this report is not “soliciting material,” is not deemed “filed” with the SEC, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing by Micron under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act.

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the disclosures contained in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement. Based upon this review and our discussions, the Compensation Committee has recommended to our Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.

The Compensation Committee
Richard M. Beyer
(Chair)
Robert E. Switz
MaryAnn Wright


Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation


No member of the Compensation Committee is or has been one of our officers or employees or an officer or employee of any of our subsidiaries during fiscal 2021.2023. During fiscal 2021,2023, none of our executive officers served on the compensation committee (or equivalent) or the board of directors of another entity whose executive officer(s) served on our Compensation Committee or Board of Directors.Board.




micronnamea.jpg49micron-logo-black-rgb-75x21.jpg59

FISCAL 20212023 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE


The following table details the total compensation earned by our Named Executive Officers in fiscal 2021, 2020,2023, 2022, and 20192021.
Name and Principal PositionYearSalary(1)Stock Awards(2)Option AwardsNon-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation(3)All Other Compensation(4)Total
Sanjay Mehrotra2021$1,350,000 $18,499,995 $— $4,800,600 $666,114 $25,316,709 
President and Chief20201,369,039 14,999,989 — 3,591,001 35,459 19,995,488 
Executive Officer20191,286,154 11,999,963 — 3,640,000 18,634 16,944,751 
David A. Zinsner2021662,000 4,999,957 — 1,177,036 14,500 6,853,493 
Executive Vice President and2020670,992 4,000,021 — 880,461 17,531 5,569,005 
Chief Financial Officer2019632,923 3,000,019 — 666,750 14,000 4,313,692 
Manish Bhatia2021695,000 5,999,969 — 1,235,710 622,194 8,552,873 
Executive Vice President,2020704,211 5,000,012 — 924,351 583,785 7,212,359 
Global Operations2019660,846 3,800,003 — 931,000 594,806 5,986,655 
Scott J. DeBoer2021595,000 4,999,957 — 1,057,910 15,700 6,668,567 
Executive Vice President,2020601,596 3,750,026 — 791,351 16,887 5,159,860 
Technology and Products2019554,462 3,000,019 — 784,000 15,662 4,354,143 
Sumit Sadana2021745,000 6,500,005 — 1,457,071 14,500 8,716,576 
Executive Vice President2020755,173 5,500,013 — 1,089,936 14,250 7,359,372 
and Chief Business Officer2019709,462 4,399,958 — 1,101,100 14,000 6,224,520 
Name and Principal PositionYearSalary(1)Bonus (2)Stock Awards(3)(4)Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation(5)All Other Compensation(6)Total
Sanjay Mehrotra2023$1,255,476 $— $23,750,005 $— $271,472 $25,276,953 
President and Chief20221,409,893 — 23,499,965 3,435,275 495,676 28,840,809 
Executive Officer20211,350,000 — 18,499,995 4,800,600 666,114 25,316,709 
Mark Murphy2023639,827 — 7,749,991 — 14,284 8,404,102 
Executive Vice President and2022266,538 250,000 12,631,963 326,555 99,986 13,575,042 
Chief Financial Officer
Manish Bhatia2023667,020 — 8,250,009 — 17,118 8,934,147 
Executive Vice President,2022725,607 — 7,999,991 904,511 8,887,720 18,517,829 
Global Operations2021695,000 — 5,999,969 1,235,710 622,194 8,552,873 
Scott DeBoer2023571,046 — 6,500,022 — 18,352 7,089,420 
Executive Vice President,2022621,203 — 6,249,944 703,968 17,450 7,592,565 
Technology and Products2021595,000 — 4,999,957 1,057,910 15,700 6,668,567 
Sumit Sadana2023715,007 — 8,500,024 — 16,500 9,231,531 
Executive Vice President2022777,809 — 8,250,001 1,057,727 15,893 10,101,430 
and Chief Business Officer2021745,000 — 6,500,005 1,457,071 14,500 8,716,576 


(1)Our fiscal year is the 52 or 53-week52-week period ending on the Thursday closest to August 31. Fiscal 2020 contained 53 weeks2023, 2022, and fiscal 2021 and 2019 each contained 52 weeks.

(2)Mr. Murphy received a cash signing bonus in fiscal 2022 upon joining the Company.

(3)The amounts shown for salary for 2020 include an additional week as compared to 2021 and 2019 in accordance with our fiscal calendar.

(2)The grant-dategrant date fair values for the stock awards are based on the closing price on the last market-tradingmarket trading day prior to the date of grant. The grant date fair value of the performance-based awards granted in fiscal 2021, 2020,2023, 2022, and 20192021 was computed by multiplying (i) the target number of restricted shares or units awarded to each Named Executive Officer, which was the assumed probable outcome as of the grant date, by (ii) either (a) the closing price of our Common Stock on the last market-tradingmarket trading day prior to the date of grant; or (b) the fair value per share as calculated by the use of a Monte-CarloMonte Carlo simulation, which represents the most likely value, if the award had a market condition performance goal. Although the assumed probable outcome as of the grant date was achievement at the target level, the terms of the awards for performance-based restricted stock unit awards granted in fiscal 2021, 2020,2023, 2022, and 20192021 also provide for achievement of up to 200% of the target amount (“maximum”).
60 |2023 Proxy Statement

The table below presents the aggregate grant-dategrant date fair value of stock awards for the periods presented assuming achievement at the maximum level for such performance-based awards. Grant date fair values for both the target and maximum levels are consistent with the amounts used to determine compensation cost under Accounting Standards Codification 718.
202120202019
Executive OfficerTime-based Stock AwardPerformance-based Stock Award at Maximum LevelTotal Stock AwardsTime-based Stock AwardPerformance-based Stock Award at Maximum LevelTotal Stock AwardsTime-based Stock AwardPerformance-based Stock Award at Maximum LevelTotal Stock Awards
Sanjay Mehrotra$9,249,995 $16,927,511 $26,177,506 $7,499,991 $13,561,648 $21,061,639 $6,000,001 $10,499,942 $16,499,943 
David A. Zinsner2,499,9764,574,9837,074,959 2,000,0103,616,4645,616,4741,499,979 2,625,056 4,125,035 
Manish Bhatia3,000,0025,489,9188,489,920 2,500,0134,520,5457,020,5581,900,008 3,324,990 5,224,998 
Scott J. DeBoer2,499,9764,574,9837,074,959 1,874,9863,390,4855,265,4711,499,979 2,625,056 4,125,035 
Sumit Sadana3,249,9905,947,5209,197,510 2,750,0144,972,6097,722,6232,199,986 3,849,962 6,049,948 
202320222021
Executive OfficerTime-based Stock AwardPerformance-based Stock Award at Maximum LevelTotal Stock AwardsTime-based Stock AwardPerformance-based Stock Award at Maximum LevelTotal Stock AwardsTime-based Stock AwardPerformance-based Stock Award at Maximum LevelTotal Stock Awards
Sanjay Mehrotra$11,874,975 $21,731,347 $33,606,322 $11,749,992 $21,502,435 $33,252,427 $9,249,995 $16,927,511 $26,177,506 
Mark Murphy3,875,015 7,091,239 10,966,254 6,315,978 11,558,203 17,874,181 
Manish Bhatia4,124,997 7,548,803 11,673,800 3,999,997 7,319,981 11,319,978 3,000,0025,489,9188,489,920
Scott DeBoer3,249,980 5,947,570 9,197,550 3,125,031 5,718,586 8,843,617 2,499,9764,574,9837,074,959
Sumit Sadana4,250,015 7,777,478 12,027,493 4,125,031 7,548,641 11,673,672 3,249,9905,947,5209,197,510
50 |2021 Proxy Statement





(3)Amounts(4)Amount shown for eachMr. Murphy for fiscal 2022 includes $9,999,999 in respect of his new hire equity awards, in the form of both time-based restricted stock and performance-based restricted units.

(5)The EIP for fiscal 2023 for all Named Executive Officers was suspended in February 2023 and no amounts were paid pursuant to the EIP and relate to the achievement of certain performance milestones.paid.


(4)(6)Includes matching contributions paid by us pursuant to our 401(k) plan. For fiscal 2021, $14,5002023, $16,500 was contributed for each of Messrs. Mehrotra, Zinsner, Bhatia, DeBoer, and Sadana.Sadana, and $12,746 for Mr. Murphy. Includes matching contributions paid by us pursuant to our Health Savings Accountfor health savings accounts in fiscal 20212023 for Messrs. Murphy, and DeBoer and de minimis non-cash benefits and related tax gross-ups paid by us for each of Messrs. Mehrotra, Murphy, Bhatia, and DeBoer.

All Other Compensation also includes the following for the Named Executive Officers mentioned below:

Amount for Mr. DeBoer inMehrotra’s fiscal 2023 compensation includes $71,567 for the amountuse of $1,200.Company aircraft for personal travel and $183,065 for personal security arrangements paid by us. While we do not consider personal security measures to be a personal benefit, but instead appropriate expenses for the benefit of the Company that arise out of our executive’s employment responsibilities and that are necessary to his or her job performance and to ensure the safety of our executives and their families, SEC regulations require the costs of certain personal security arrangements to be reported as personal benefits. In determining to authorize these security arrangements, the Compensation Committee evaluated the need to respond to specific incidents and threats, and reviewed recommendations from a leading security firm. In addition, the Compensation Committee has established a policy to review personal security costs quarterly. The amountsSecurity Committee also has an annual process for oversight of the nature of security measures and will discontinue, adjust, or enhance security as appropriate.
Amount for Mr. Bhatia include payments related to his overseas assignment in Singapore, including anyBhatia’s fiscal 2022 compensation includes a tax equalization payments. of $8,388,304 to be paid by us for him and we expect to recover $6,783,325 for fiscal 2023 and all or a portion of the remaining $1,604,979 over the next few years with foreign tax credits or Singapore tax refund.

Employees who participate in our expatriate programs are responsible for substantially the same income tax liability as they would have been had they worked exclusively in the United States. Each expatriate employee is responsible for a hypothetical U.S. income tax liability based on an estimate of their anticipated U.S. income tax liability on their stay-at-home income, and we are responsible for income tax liabilities associated with the assignment or host country taxes, as applicable, and any additional taxes attributed to the international assignment. To the extent that tax years differ from the fiscal year in which the compensation was earned that gave rise to the expatriates’ income tax liability, or in the case that we have not reached the end of the tax year, the amount of tax equalization has been estimated. We estimate that Mr. Bhatia received or will receive no net benefit from tax equalization (when considered together with the impact of his overseas assignment) in 2021 2020, and 2019 because his hypothetical U.S. tax exceeded his actual and/or estimated global (U.S. and international) taxes in each year.

micron-logo-black-rgb-75x21.jpg61

All Other Compensation for fiscal 2021 also includes the following for the Named Executive Officers mentioned below:

Amount for Mr. Mehrotra includes $566,186 for personal security arrangements. While we do not consider personal security measures to be a personal benefit, but instead appropriate expenses for the benefit of the Company that arise out of our executive’s employment responsibilities and that are necessary to his job performance and to ensure the safety of Mr. Mehrotra and his family, amounts represent payments for personal security arrangements. In determining to authorize these non-standard arrangements and expenses, the Board evaluated the need to respond to specific incidents and threats, and has reviewed recommendations from a leading security firm. In addition, the Board has an annual process for oversight of the nature and cost of security measures and will discontinue, adjust, or enhance security as appropriate.

Additionally, amount for Mr. Mehrotra includes $64,228 for the use of Company aircraft for personal travel, $16,397 for commuting expense, $1,059 for a reimbursement of federal, state, and other income taxes from imputed income related to his commuting expenses, and $3,744 in membership dues and other miscellaneous amounts.

Amount for Mr. Bhatia includes $108,985 for cash-payment allowances to Mr. Bhatia associated withcompleted his expatriate assignment $288,936 in housing expenses, $147,911Singapore in automobile expenses,fiscal 2022. As a result, he is subject to the deemed exercise rule upon exit with respect to his unvested restricted equity awards granted during his Singapore expatriate assignment and $61,464 in miscellaneous expense. Additionally, amount for Mr. Bhatia includes $398 in membership dues and other miscellaneous amounts.is required to pay Singapore taxes as if gains were realized. All or most of the taxes paid on his unvested awards are expected to be recovered when those restricted equity awards granted during his Singapore expatriate assignment vest or forfeit.







micronnamea.jpg5162 |2023 Proxy Statement

GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS IN FISCAL 20212023


The table below sets forth the plan-based award grants to our Named Executive Officers in fiscal 2021.
NameGrant DateEstimated Future Payouts under Non-Equity Incentive 
Plan Awards(1)
Estimated Future Payouts under Equity Incentive Plan Awards(2)All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units(3)Grant Date Fair Value of Stock (or Units)(4)
ThresholdTargetMaxThresholdTargetMax
Sanjay MehrotraNA$1,350,000 $2,700,000 $5,400,000 
10/16/2037,620 164,285 328,570 $9,250,000 
10/16/20178,090 9,249,995 
David A. ZinsnerNA331,000 662,000 1,324,000 
10/16/2010,168 44,401 88,802 2,499,980 
10/16/2048,132 2,499,976 
Manish BhatiaNA347,500 695,000 1,390,000 
10/16/2012,201 53,281 106,562 2,999,966 
10/16/2057,759 3,000,002 
Scott J. DeBoerNA297,500 595,000 1,190,000 
10/16/2010,168 44,401 88,802 2,499,980 
10/16/2048,132 2,499,976 
Sumit SadanaNA409,750 819,500 1,639,000 
10/16/2013,218 57,722 115,444 3,250,016 
10/16/2062,572 3,249,990 
2023.
NameGrant DateEstimated Future Payouts
under Non-Equity Incentive 
Plan Awards(1)
Estimated Future Payouts under Equity Incentive Plan Awards(2)All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units(3)Grant Date Fair Value of Stock (or Units)(4)
ThresholdTargetMaxThresholdTargetMax
Sanjay MehrotraNA$1,524,350 $3,048,700 $6,097,400 
10/13/2244,383 201,325 402,650 $11,875,031 
10/13/22225,118 11,874,975 
Mark MurphyNA385,000 770,000 1,540,000 
10/13/2214,483 65,695 131,390 3,874,976 
10/13/2273,460 3,875,015 
Manish BhatiaNA401,363 802,725 1,605,450 
10/13/2215,417 69,934 139,868 4,125,011 
10/13/2278,199 4,124,997 
Scott DeBoerNA312,375 624,750 1,249,500 
10/13/2212,147 55,100 110,200 3,250,042 
10/13/2261,611 3,249,980 
Sumit SadanaNA469,350 938,700 1,877,400 
10/13/2215,885 72,053 144,106 4,250,009 
10/13/2280,569 4,250,015 


(1)RepresentsThe EIP for fiscal 2023 was suspended in February 2023 and no bonuses were paid. As required by SEC rules, the amounts shown in the table represent estimated possible payouts for fiscal 20212023 under the EIP.EIP prior to its suspension. Payment of bonuses under the EIP iswould have been dependent upon meeting specified performance goals. A description of the performance milestones associated with such bonuses is included in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

(2)Represents restricted stock units awarded in fiscal 20212023 under the 2007 Plan with performance-based and market-based restrictions. The threshold amounts shown relate solely to the 2021 TSR2023 rTSR PRSU Awards.Award. For the 2021 High-Value Solutions2023 DRAM Market Segment PRSU Awards and the 2023 NAND Market Segment PRSU Awards, achievement at the relevant threshold level results in no payout. For all PRSU awards, achievement between the threshold level and the maximum level is paid out based on interpolation between performance levels. Information related to the performance-based and market-based restrictions associated with these shares is contained in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”All of the PRSUs include the potential to receive dividends at the same rate as other holders of Common Stock. Any such dividends initially will be unvested and will accumulate and pay out in cash only if and when the underlying PRSUs vest.

(3)Represents restricted stock awarded in fiscal 20212023 under the 2007 Plan with time-based restrictions. Time-based restrictions on these awards lapse in three equal installments over a three-year period from the date of the award.The restricted stock includes the potential to receive dividends at the same rate as other holders of Common Stock. Any such dividends initially will be unvested and will accumulate and pay out in cash only if and when the underlying shares of restricted stock vest.

(4)The value shown is based on the fair value as of the date of grant and was computed by multiplying (i) the target number of restricted shares or units awarded to each Named Executive Officer by (ii) either (a) the closing price of our Common Stock on the last market-trading day prior to the date of grant; or (b) the fair value per share as calculated by the use of a Monte-Carlo simulation, which represents the most likely value if the award had a market condition performance goal.
micron-logo-black-rgb-75x21.jpg63

Plan Information


The purpose of the 2007 Plan is to promote our success by linking the personal interests of our employees and officers to those of our shareholders, and by providing participants with an incentive for outstanding performance. Permissible awards under the 2007 Plan include: options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, deferred stock units, and dividend equivalent rights. We have issued options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, and dividend equivalent rights under the 2007 Plan. Options granted under the 2007 Plan have an exercise price equal to the fair market value (as defined by the 2007 Plan) on the date of grant and, since March 2014, a
52 |2021 Proxy Statement


term of eight years. For purposes of share counting, each restricted stock unit or share of restricted stock issued under the 2007 Plan reduces the number of shares available for issuance by two.


Historically, we have provided annual bonuses to our executive officers pursuant to the EIP. As discussed above, in October 2021, the Compensation Committee reviewed the goals established undersuspended the EIP for fiscal 2021 and certified achievement of results.2023.


Lapsing of Restrictions Associated with Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Unit Awards


The restrictions associated with the restricted stock and restricted stock units granted to the Named Executive Officers include both time-based restrictions and performance-based restrictions. Time-based restrictions lapse in three equal installments over a three-year period. The restrictions associated with performance-based awards are described below.


Issuance and Vesting of Performance-based Awards


Restricted Stock Units


Our executive officers received awards related to twothree performance goals: a high value solutionsDRAM market segment metric, a NAND market segment metric and a company valuationrTSR metric. Please see “Fiscal 20212023 Executive Compensation – Fiscal 20212023 Long-Term Equity Incentives” section of the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.” The number of shares that will be received at the end of the three years varies between 0% and 200% of the targeted share amount and is dependent upon the level of achievement. All threshold, target, and maximum amounts require significant execution and effort with no assurance of achievement guaranteed. In the absence of at leastUnless the threshold targets beingare achieved or exceeded, the restrictions will not lapse and the shares will be forfeited.


Cash Awards


BonusesNo bonuses were paid to the Named Executive Officers infor fiscal 20212023 as a result of our suspension of the EIP for fiscal 2023 in February 2023 regardless of the achievement of certain goals. Please see the “Fiscal 20212023 Executive Compensation – Fiscal 20212023 Short-Term Incentive Awards” section of the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”






micronnamea.jpg5364 |2023 Proxy Statement

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS
AT 2021 FISCAL 2023 YEAR-END


The following table provides information with respect to outstanding stock options, restricted stock, and restricted stock units held as of September 2, 2021,August 31, 2023, by our Named Executive Officers.
Option AwardsStock Awards
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised OptionsOption Exercise Price
($)
Option Expiration DateShares or Units of Stock That Have Not VestedEquity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested(#)Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested($)(1)
NameExercisable
(#)
Unexercisable
(#)
Number
(#)
Market Value($)(1)
Sanjay Mehrotra571,976$28.20 5/8/202547,237(2)$3,495,066 18,989(3)$1,404,996 
105,23135,077(4)41.5610/24/2025107,619(5)7,962,730 66,213(6)4,899,100 
178,090(7)13,176,879 26,586(8)1,967,098 
270,229(9)19,994,244 
7,157(10)529,546 
89,045(11)6,588,440 
75,240(12)5,567,008 
David A. Zinsner8,05027,168(13)44.212/19/202612,017(14)889,138 4,747(3)351,231 
11,809(2)873,748 16,554(6)1,224,830 
28,699(5)2,123,439 6,647(8)491,812 
48,132(7)3,561,287 72,176(9)5,340,302 
1,912(10)141,469 
24,066(11)1,780,643 
20,335(12)1,504,587 
Manish Bhatia39,98713,330(4)41.5610/24/202515,471(2)1,144,699 6,013(3)444,902 
14,958(2)1,106,742 20,967(6)1,551,348 
35,873(5)2,654,243 8,419(8)622,922 
57,759(7)4,273,588 90,655(9)6,707,563 
2,400(10)177,576 
28,879(11)2,136,757 
24,402(12)1,805,504 
Scott J. DeBoer8,770(4)41.5610/24/202511,809(2)873,748 4,747(3)351,231 
26,905(5)1,990,701 16,554(6)1,224,830 
48,132(7)3,561,287 6,647(8)491,812 
67,667(9)5,006,681 
1,792(10)132,590 
24,066(11)1,780,643 
20,335(12)1,504,587 
Sumit Sadana14,031(4)41.5610/24/202517,320(2)1,281,507 6,962(3)515,118 
39,461(5)2,919,719 24,278(6)1,796,329 
62,572(7)4,629,702 9,748(8)721,255 
98,970(9)7,322,790 
2,622(10)194,002 
31,286(11)2,314,851 
26,436(12)1,956,000 
Option AwardsStock Awards
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised OptionsOption Exercise Price
($)
Option Expiration DateShares or Units of Stock That Have Not VestedEquity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested(#)Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested($)(1)
NameExercisable
(#)
Unexercisable
(#)
Number
(#)
Market Value($)(1)
Sanjay Mehrotra471,976$28.20 5/8/202559,363(2)$4,151,848 34,611(3)$2,420,693 
59,30841.5610/24/2025117,406(4)8,211,376 89,045(5)6,227,807 
225,118(6)15,744,753 44,027(7)3,079,248 
44,027(8)3,079,248 
73,946(9)5,171,783 
56,280(10)3,936,223 
56,280(11)3,936,223 
88,765(12)6,208,224 
Mark Murphy60,041(13)4,199,268 22,515(7)1,574,699 
73,460(6)5,137,792 22,515(8)1,574,699 
37,382(9)2,614,497 
18,365(10)1,284,448 
18,365(11)1,284,448 
28,965(12)2,025,812 
Manish Bhatia53,31741.5610/24/202519,253(2)1,346,555 11,225(3)785,077 
39,968(4)2,795,362 28,879(5)2,019,797 
78,199(6)5,469,238 14,988(7)1,048,261 
14,988(8)1,048,261 
25,173(9)1,760,600 
19,550(10)1,367,327 
19,550(11)1,367,327 
30,834(12)2,156,530 
Scott DeBoer8,77041.5610/24/202516,044(2)1,122,117 9,354(3)654,219 
31,225(4)2,183,877 24,066(5)1,683,176 
61,611(6)4,309,073 11,709(7)818,927 
11,709(8)818,927 
19,666(9)1,375,440 
15,403(10)1,077,286 
15,403(11)1,077,286 
24,294(12)1,699,122 
Sumit Sadana14,03141.5610/24/202520,857(2)1,458,739 12,161(3)850,540 
41,217(4)2,882,717 31,286(5)2,188,143 
80,569(6)5,634,996 15,456(7)1,080,993 
15,456(8)1,080,993 
25,960(9)1,815,642 
20,142(10)1,408,731 
20,142(11)1,408,731 
31,769(12)2,221,924 


54 |2021 Proxy Statementmicron-logo-black-rgb-75x21.jpg65

(1)Calculated by multiplying the number of shares of restricted stock or restricted stock units by $73.99,$69.94, the closing price of our Common Stock on September 2, 2021.August 31, 2023.
(2)Restrictions on shares lapsed on October 16, 2021.2023.
(3)Represents the banked number of restricted stock units.2021 rTSR PRSU Awards. Performance-based restrictions on stock units lapsed in October 20212023 based on the achievement of a free cash flowan rTSR goal through fiscal 2021.2023.
(4)Options vested on October 24, 2021.
(5)Restrictions on shares lapsed or will lapse, as applicable, in equal installments on October 16, 202113, 2023 and October 16, 2022.13, 2024.
(6)(5)Represents the banked number of restricted stock units.2021 High-Value NAND PRSU Awards. Performance-based restrictions on stock units lapsed in October 20212023 based on the achievement of a high value solutions saleshigh-value NAND shipment goal through fiscal 2020.2022.
(7)(6)Restrictions on shares lapsed or will lapse, as applicable, in equal installmentson 33.33% of the units on October 16, 2021, October 16, 2022,15, 2023 and October 16, 2023.on 8.33% each quarter thereafter over the remaining two years.
(8)(7)Represents the bankedtarget number of restricted stock units. Performance-based restrictions on stock units lapsed in October 2021 based on the achievement of a company valuation goal through fiscal 2019.
(9)Represents the banked number of restricted stock units.2022 High-Value NAND PRSU Awards. Performance-based restrictions on stock units lapsed or will lapse, as applicable, in October 20212023 and October 20222024 based on the achievement of a high value solutions saleshigh-value NAND shipment goal through fiscal 2020.2023 and 2024.
(10)(8)Represents the bankedtarget number of restricted stock units.2022 Market Segment NAND PRSU Awards. Performance-based restrictions on stock units lapsed or will lapse, as applicable, in October 20212023 and October 2022 based on the achievement of an rTSR goal through fiscal 2021.
(11)Represents the target number of restricted stock units. Performance-based restrictions on stock units lapse in October 2022 and October 20232024 based on the achievement of a high value solutions salesNAND market segment goal through fiscal 20222023 and 2023.2024.
(12)(9)Represents the target number of restricted stock units.2022 rTSR PRSU Awards. Performance-based restrictions on stock units lapsed or will lapse, as applicable, in October 20222023 and October 20232024 based on the achievement of a rTSR goal through fiscal 20222023 and 2023.2024.
(13)Options vest(10)Represents the target number of 2023 DRAM PRSU Awards. Performance-based restrictions on February 19, 2022.stock units lapse in October 2024 and October 2025 based on the achievement of a DRAM market segment goal through fiscal 2024 and 2025.
(14)(11)Represents the target number of 2023 NAND PRSU Awards. Performance-based restrictions on stock units lapse in October 2024 and October 2025 based on the achievement of a NAND market segment goal through fiscal 2024 and 2025.
(12)Represents the target number of 2023 rTSR PRSU Awards. Performance-based restrictions on stock units lapse in October 2024 and October 2025 based on the achievement of a rTSR goal through fiscal 2024 and 2025.
(13)Restrictions on shares will lapse, as applicable, in equal installments on February 19, 2022.


April 18, 2024 and April 18, 2025.
micronnamea.jpg5566 |2023 Proxy Statement

OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED IN FISCAL 20212023


The following table sets forth information related to the number of options and restricted awards held by each of the Named Executive Officers that were exercised or vested in fiscal 20212023 and the value realized.
 Option AwardsStock Awards
NameNumber of Shares Acquired on ExerciseValue Realized on Exercise(1)Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting(2)Value Realized on Vesting(3)
Sanjay Mehrotra— — 448,662 $29,223,664 
David A. Zinsner73,451 $2,685,147 103,167 6,785,728 
Manish Bhatia— — 144,007 8,737,054 
Scott J. DeBoer75,267 3,528,328 109,885 6,664,569 
Sumit Sadana100,177 4,454,410 149,543 9,337,633 
 Option AwardsStock Awards
NameNumber of Shares Acquired on ExerciseValue Realized on Exercise(1)Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting(2)Value Realized on Vesting(3)
Sanjay Mehrotra81,000 $2,132,730 345,198 $21,152,256 
Mark Murphy— — 54,832 3,608,088 
Manish Bhatia— — 114,173 6,990,493 
Scott DeBoer— — 91,741 5,631,197 
Sumit Sadana— — 122,079 7,473,444 


(1)Calculated as the aggregate value of the number of options exercised multiplied by the difference between the fair market value per share at the time of the exercise and the exercise price of the option.

(2)Includes performance-based restricted units vested in October 20212023 based on performance completed by the end of fiscal 20212023 and performance-based restricted units for which time-based restrictions lapsed in fiscal 20212023 but for which the performance condition had been met in prior years. Excludes performance-based restricted units vested in October 20202022 based on performance completed by the end of fiscal 20202022 and performance-based restricted units with time-based restrictions that had met the performance-based condition but for which the time-based restriction had not lapsed by the end of fiscal 2021.2023.

(3)Value calculated by multiplying number of shares by the market value per share on the vesting date.




20212023 NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION


Mr. Mehrotra is the only Named Executive Officer who has participated in the Micron Technology, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Deferred Compensation Plan”) through the end of fiscal 2021.
NameExecutive Contributions in Last Fiscal Year ($)(1)Registrant Contributions in Last Fiscal Year ($)Aggregate Earnings in Last Fiscal Year ($)Aggregate Withdrawals/Distributions ($)Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year-End ($)(2)
$6,234,092 
Sanjay Mehrotra$2,444,539 $— $1,559,326 $(877,781)$6,234,092 
2023.
NameExecutive Contributions in Last Fiscal Year ($)Registrant Contributions in Last Fiscal Year ($)Aggregate Earnings (Losses) in Last Fiscal Year ($)Aggregate Withdrawals/Distributions ($)Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year-End ($)
Sanjay Mehrotra$1,788,922 (1)$— $1,185,320 $(2,103,225)$8,064,548 (2)


(1)$649,039357,558 included in the Summary Compensation table in the “Salary” column for fiscal 2023 and $1,795,500$1,431,364 included in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column for fiscal 2021.2022.

(2)Balance as of the beginning of fiscal 20212023 was $3,108,008.$7,193,531.
micron-logo-black-rgb-75x21.jpg67

Summary of Material Terms of Deferred Compensation Plan


The Deferred Compensation Plan is a nonqualified deferred compensation plan under which designated eligible participants may elect to defer compensation. Eligible participants include a select group of management and other employees of the Company that meet certain compensation requirements, including each of the Company’s Named Executive Officers. Pursuant to the Deferred Compensation Plan and subject to applicable tax laws, participants may elect to defer up to 75% of their base salary and up to 100% of their bonus compensation. The Company may, in its sole discretion, provide matching and/or discretionary contributions to the Deferred Compensation Plan. Participants will be 100% vested at all times in their deferral accounts; provided, however, that matching and/or discretionary contributions by the Company, if any, may be subject to a vesting schedule as provided by the Company. Participants may elect to receive payment of their account balances upon a fixed date, or their separation
56 |2021 Proxy Statement


from service with the Company, or the earlier of a fixed date or their separation from service. Participants may elect to receive payment of their account balances in a single sum cash payment or in substantially equal annual cash installments over not less than two years and not more than ten years. Account balances will become payable immediately in a single sum cash payment upon a participant’s death or disability, or upon a changeChange in control.Control. Account balances under the Deferred Compensation Plan earn or lose value based on the investment performance of one or more of the various investment funds offered under the Deferred Compensation Plan and selected by the participants. Incentive compensation that is subject to our Recoupment Policy remains subject to that policy when deferred under the Deferred Compensation Plan. Compensation deferred under the Deferred Compensation Plan represents an unsecured obligation of the Company. Amounts deferred under the Deferred Compensation Plan are held in a separate rabbi trust established to pay Plan benefits.




CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PAY RATIO


In accordance with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the ratio of the annual total compensation of our Chief Executive OfficerCEO to the annual total compensation of our median compensated employee.


The annual total compensation of our median compensated employee excluding our Chief Executive Officer, for fiscal 20212023 was $64,827.$54,570.
The annual total compensation of our Chief Executive OfficerCEO for fiscal 20212023 was $25,316,709.$25,276,953.
The ratio of the annual total compensation of our Chief Executive OfficerCEO to that of our median employee for fiscal 20212023 was estimated to be 391463 to 1.
 
The median compensated employee generally is the employee whose annual total compensation is at the midpoint of our employees (excluding our CEO), ranked in order of their compensation amounts. As permitted by the SEC rules, we used base salary, bonuses, and grant date fair value of equity awards granted to employees in fiscal 2021,2023, as reported in our payroll data, to identify our median employee. When calculating our median compensation for fiscal 2021,2023, we utilized our global employee population and exchange rates as of September 2, 2021.August 31, 2023. As of September 2, 2021,August 31, 2023, our employee population was approximately 43,000. This includes all regular, part-time, and temporary employees. No exclusions were made for countries, employee types, or acquisitions.
 
The Median Compensation Employeemedian compensated employee for fiscal 20212023 was an Equipmenta Manufacturing Engineer in Taiwan. We determined actual annual total compensation in accordance with Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K and in the same manner as our Chief Executive OfficerCEO in the Summary Compensation Table using the daily average New Taiwan dollar exchange rates for compensation paid to the Median Compensation Employeemedian compensated employee during fiscal 2021.2023. We compared this value to the annual total compensation of our Chief Executive OfficerCEO for purposes of the ratio set forth above. We did not make any cost of living adjustments.


The SEC rules for identifying the median compensated employee and calculating the pay ratio based on that employee’s annual total compensation allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions, and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their compensation practices. As such, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported above, as other companies may have different employment and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates, and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios. Based on the above, the ratio shown above of the annual total
compensation of our Chief Executive OfficerCEO to the annual total compensation of the Median Compensation Employeemedian compensated employee for fiscal 20212023 is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K.



68 |2023 Proxy Statement

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL


The following tables quantify the estimated payments and benefits for each of the continuing Named Executive Officers pursuant to the Executive Agreement and NEO Severance Agreements and in the event of a changeChange in controlControl as described in the “Severance and Change in Control Arrangements” section of the “Compensation Discussion and
micronnamea.jpg57


Analysis.” The amounts listed for the continuing Named Executive Officers are estimated amounts that were calculated as if a changeChange in controlControl occurred on September 2, 2021,August 31, 2023, or the Named Executive Officers separated from service on September 2, 2021,August 31, 2023, the last day of fiscal 2021.2023.


Potential Payment upon Termination without Change in Control


All the continuing Named Executive Officers have severance agreements. Payments and benefits upon termination for Messrs. Mehrotra, Zinsner,Murphy, Bhatia and Sadana are payable only if their employment with the Company terminates as a result of death or disability, the Company terminates their employment without cause, or they resign for good reason.


The “Salary” portion of severance payments is paid on our regular bi-weekly payroll schedule during the officer’s one-year Transition Period subject to the possibility of a six-month delay that may be required by Section 409A of the Code (“Section 409A”). If Section 409A imposes a six-month delay, payments duringsubject to the delay would be accumulated and paid to the officer on the first day of the seventh month following the Named Executive Officer’s separation from service. The remaining payments would then be paid according to our regular payroll schedule.


The “Bonus” portion of the severance payments includes a component that is paid only if the applicable performance goals are achieved before or during the applicable Transition Period. Such payments are made at the same time that the other officers participating in the applicable bonus plan receive their payments, if any, and typically would occur during our first fiscal quarter. Mr. Mehrotra also would receive a separate bonus ofseverance payment equal to two times his target annual bonus under the EIP for the year of termination paid on the anniversary of his termination.


The “Cash inIn Lieu of Benefits” portion of the severance payments is calculated based on the difference between the amount of premiums the Named Executive Officer paid each month for benefits coverage as our employee and the estimated premiums the Named Executive Officer would need to pay each month for the same or similar coverage as a former employee. This monthly amount is multiplied by the number of months in the Named Executive Officer’s Transition Period and is grossed-up for taxes, with the exception of Mr. Mehrotra, who would receive two times the monthlythis amount. All gross-up calculations and payments are based on the standard supplemental withholding rates provided by federal and state guidelines. We do not use the Named Executive Officer’s actual tax rate for these calculations. TheThese “Cash in Lieu of Benefits” payment ispayments will be made in a lump sum within 30 or 60 days after the Named Executive Officer’s separation from service for Dr. DeBoer or Mr. Mehrotra, respectively, and in roughly equal installments over the Transition Period for our other Named Executive Officers, subject to the possibility of a six-month delay that may be required by Section 409A. If Section 409A imposes a six-month delay, the payment would be made to the Named Executive Officer (or commence, for our Named Executive Officers other than Dr. DeBoer and Mr. Mehrotra) on the first day of the seventh month following the officer’s separation from service.
NameNameSalary(1)Bonus(2)Cash in Lieu of Benefits Payment(3)Value of Extended Option Vesting and Exercise Term (4)Value of Extended Restricted Stock Vesting(5)Value of Unearned Performance -Based Stock Awards(6)TotalNameSalary(1)Bonus(2)Cash in Lieu of Benefits Payment(3)Value of Extended Option Exercise Term (4)Value of Extended Restricted Stock Vesting(5)Value of Unearned Performance -Based Stock Awards(6)Total
Sanjay MehrotraSanjay Mehrotra$2,700,000 $10,000,000 $390,263 $1,256,904 $11,868,662 $18,533,015 $44,748,844 Sanjay Mehrotra$2,836,000 $5,398,547 $389,026 $1,053,556 $17,441,917 $12,122,071 $39,241,117 
David A. Zinsner662,000 1,177,036 91,747 865,358 4,011,664 4,808,758 11,616,563 
Mark MurphyMark Murphy700,000 — 113,036 — 5,096,668 1,735,351 7,645,055 
Manish BhatiaManish Bhatia695,000 1,235,710 59,695 475,025 5,003,056 6,061,705 13,530,191 Manish Bhatia729,750 — 93,209 173,083 5,934,619 3,986,510 10,917,171 
Scott J. DeBoer595,000 1,057,910 97,891 291,662 3,056,157 4,637,471 9,736,091 
Scott DeBoerScott DeBoer624,750 — 117,676 28,470 4,727,594 3,261,442 8,759,932 
Sumit SadanaSumit Sadana745,000 1,457,071 89,052 466,618 4,284,539 6,791,098 13,833,378 Sumit Sadana782,250 — 86,676 45,549 6,187,102 4,258,087 11,359,664 

micron-logo-black-rgb-75x21.jpg69

Table of Contents
(1)Represents one year of the Named Executive Officer’s salary as of September 2, 2021,August 31, 2023, except for Mr. Mehrotra, which represents two years of salary as of September 2, 2021.
(2)RepresentsAugust 31, 2023. As agreed with the actual EIP bonus paidNamed Executive Officers at the time of their salary reductions for fiscal 2021, except2023, upon a termination in fiscal 2023, salary severance benefits would be based on salaries in effect for fiscal 2023 prior to reduction.

(2)Represents for Mr. Mehrotra which also includesa bonus severance payment equal to two times his target annual bonus, subject to the maximum award limit imposed by the EIP. This column also includes the actual EIP bonus paid for fiscal 2023 for each Named Executive Officer. As discussed above, the EIP for fiscal 2023 was suspended in February 2023, so none of our Named Executive Officers received a bonus for fiscal 2023.

(3)Represents a cash payment in an amount estimated to allow the Named Executive Officer to purchase during the Transition Period benefits similar to those received while an employee, except for Mr. Mehrotra, which represents twice thethat amount. The amount listed includes a gross-up calculation for the tax impact of the payment.
58 |2021 Proxy Statement



(4)Represents the total value resulting from an extension of the exercise period for stock options through the 12-month Transition Period plus thirty days, or, if shorter, the remaining life of the options, for options that are exercisablewere outstanding as of September 2, 2021 and that are expected to vest during the Named Executive Officer’s Transition Period.August 31, 2023. The incremental fair value of each option award is estimated as of September 2, 2021August 31, 2023 using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. The expected volatilities utilized are based on implied volatility from traded options on our stock. The expected lives are based on the shorter of the length of the Transition Period plus thirty days or the remaining life of the option. The risk-free interest rates utilized are based on the U.S. Treasury yield as of September 2, 2021.August 31, 2023.

(5)Represents the value resulting from the additional vesting of restricted shares during the Named Executive Officer’s Transition Period. The amount shown is calculated as the number of additional shares that would vest during the Transition Period multiplied by $73.99,$69.94, our closing stock price on September 2, 2021.August 31, 2023.

(6)Represents the value resulting from the vesting of performance based restricted awards during the Named Executive Officer’s Transition Period. The amount shown is calculated as the number of additional shares that would vest during the Transition Period based on actual attainment of performance goals through August 31, 2023, multiplied by $73.99,$69.94, our closing stock price on September 2, 2021.August 31, 2023.

Potential Payment under Termination with Change in Control


A changeFor purposes of the Named Executive Officers’ Severance Agreements, a Change in controlControl is generally defined as a change in the majority of the members of the Board of Directors within a specified time period, or the acquisition of 35% or more of our outstanding Common Stock.Stock, or a reorganization or sale of assets after which the holders of the Company stock before the transaction do not hold a majority of the stock of the surviving entity.


Our equity plans, grant agreements, and EIP have changeChange in controlControl provisions, including “double-trigger” vesting provisions in the event of a changeChange in control.Control. As a result, if awards are assumed by a successor in connection with a changeChange in control,Control, such awards will not automatically vest and pay out solely as a result of the changeChange in control.Control. Instead, such awards will only vest if within one year after the effective date of the changeChange in control,Control, the participant’s employment is terminated without cause or, in the case of certain participants including our Named Executive Officers, if the participant resigns for good reason. For equity awards, the impact of a changeChange in controlControl differs for outstanding time-based and performance-based awards. Outstanding time-based awards would automatically become fully vested or the applicable restrictions would lapse upon occurrence of the double-trigger event. For our Named Executive Officers, upon the occurrence of a double-trigger event, outstanding performance-based awards are treated as if all required performance goals were satisfied at the target level, and the awards vested, on the date of the double-trigger event, except that if applicable performance goals have been exceeded, or the applicable performance period has been completed, at the time of a double-trigger event, performance-based awards will be treated as if relevant performance goals were satisfied at the actual level instead of the target level, subject to any applicable caps.


Under the EIP, a changeChange in controlControl results in an early payout of awards, to the extent earned. Upon a changeChange in control,Control, performance achievement is measured as of the last day of the month preceding the changeChange in control.Control.

70 |2023 Proxy Statement

Table of Contents
We do not have separate changeChange in controlControl agreements for our Named Executive Officers. The Severance Agreements for Messrs. Mehrotra, Zinsner,Murphy, Bhatia, and Sadana provide for transitional benefits for changeChange in controlControl separation. Change in controlControl separation means a qualifying separation from service that occurs on or within 12 months following a changeChange in control.Control. In the event of a changeChange in controlControl separation, the payments for “Salary,” “Bonus,” and “Cash in Lieu of Benefit” for these Named Executive Officers on a Change in Control separation are paid in a lump sum within 60 days from the date of separation, subject to the possibility of a six-month delay that may be required by Section 409A. All outstanding time-based and performance-based awards would become fully vested.


The compensation that executive officers could receive if a changeChange in controlControl occurs is intended to enable them to objectively evaluate whether a potential changeChange in controlControl is in the best interest of us and our shareholders.
micronnamea.jpg59


The following table sets forth the estimated benefits payable to the Named Executive Officers pursuant to changeChange in controlControl agreements or provisions, assuming a changeChange in controlControl separation occurred on September 2, 2021.August 31, 2023.
NameNameSalary(1)Bonus(2)Cash in Lieu of Benefits Payment(3)Value of Options(4)Value of Stock Awards(5)TotalNameSalary(1)Bonus(2)Cash in Lieu of Benefits Payment(3)Value of Options(4)Value of Stock Awards(5)Total
Sanjay MehrotraSanjay Mehrotra$2,700,000 $10,000,000 $390,263 $1,137,547 $65,585,106 $79,812,916 Sanjay Mehrotra$2,836,000 $5,398,547 $389,026 $— $62,220,023 $70,843,596 
David A. Zinsner993,000 1,177,036 137,621 809,063 18,282,485 21,399,205 
Mark MurphyMark Murphy1,050,000 703,810 169,553 — 19,695,664 $21,619,027 
Manish BhatiaManish Bhatia1,042,500 1,235,710 89,543 432,292 22,625,846 25,425,891 Manish Bhatia1,094,625 733,722 139,813 — 21,181,399 23,149,559 
Scott J. DeBoer595,000 1,057,910 97,891 284,411 12,939,914 14,975,126 
Scott DeBoerScott DeBoer624,750 — 117,676 — 13,260,158 14,002,584 
Sumit SadanaSumit Sadana1,117,500 1,457,071 133,579 455,025 23,651,273 26,814,448 Sumit Sadana1,173,375 858,008 130,014 — 22,050,613 24,212,010 


(1)Represents one and a halfone-and-a-half years of the Named Executive Officer’s salary as of September 2, 2021,August 31, 2023, except for Mr. Mehrotra, which represents two years of his salary as of September 2, 2021,August 31, 2023, and for Mr.Dr. DeBoer, which represents one year of his salary. Mr. DeBoer’ssalary as of August 31, 2023. As agreed with the Named Executive Officers at the time of their salary reductions for fiscal 2023, upon a termination in fiscal 2023, salary severance agreement does not providebenefits would be based on salaries in effect for additional benefits upon separation duefiscal 2023 prior to a change in control.reduction.

(2)Represents the actualtarget EIP bonus paidopportunity for fiscal 2021,2023, except for Mr. Mehrotra, which also includes two times his target annual bonus, subject to the maximum award limit imposed by the EIP.EIP, and for Dr. DeBoer, which includes his actual EIP bonus paid for fiscal 2023. These bonus severance figures factor in the base salary reduction for our Named Executive Officers for fiscal 2023.

(3)Represents a cash payment in an amount estimated to allow the Named Executive Officer to purchase 18 months of benefits similar to those received while an employee, except for Mr. Mehrotra, which represents 24 months of such benefits, and Mr.for Dr. DeBoer, which represents 12 months of such benefits. Mr. DeBoer’sThe severance agreement for Dr. DeBoer does not provide for additionalenhanced benefits upon separation due toin connection with a changeChange in control.Control. The amountamounts listed includes a gross-up calculationinclude gross-ups for the tax impact of the payment.these payments.

(4)All outstanding unvested options are time-based equity awardsexercisable on August 31, 2023 and would have fully vested on September 2, 2021. Amount shown is calculated as the excess of $73.99, the closing price of our stock on September 2, 2021, over the exercise price of theno options that would have beenare subject to accelerated vesting due to a changeChange in control.Control.

(5)All outstanding time-based and performance-based restricted stock awards would have fully vested at target or actual achievement level on September 2, 2021,August 31, 2023, except for Mr.Dr. DeBoer, whose separation agreement doesin effect as of August 31, 2023 did not include a changeChange in controlControl provision. Mr. DeBoer’s fiscal 2020Fiscal 2022 and 20212023 performance-based restricted stock awards for Dr. DeBoer each have a performance period of three years, and two-thirds of histheir respective fiscal 20202022 and one-third of histheir respective fiscal 20212023 performance-based awards would have vested on September 2, 2021.August 31, 2023. The amount shown is calculated as the number of shares upon which restrictions would lapse, multiplied by $73.99,$69.94, the closing price of our Common Stock on September 2, 2021.August 31, 2023.



60 micron-logo-black-rgb-75x21.jpg71

Dr. DeBoer’s Amended and Restated Severance Agreement

In October 2023 we entered into an amended and restated severance agreement with Dr. DeBoer. Details on this amendment and restatement are described in the “Severance and Change in Control Arrangements” section of the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.” The following table sets forth the estimated benefits that would have been payable to Dr. DeBoer upon a qualifying termination of employment on August 31, 2023 in the absence of a Change in Control, under his amended and restated severance agreement if it had been in effect as of August 31, 2023.

NameSalary(1)Bonus(2)Cash in Lieu of Benefits Payment(3)Value of Extended Option Exercise Term (4)Value of Extended Restricted Stock Vesting(5)Value of Unearned Performance -Based Stock Awards(6)Total
Scott DeBoer$624,750 $624,750 $74,665 $28,470 $4,727,594 $3,261,442 $9,341,671 

(1)Represents one year of Dr. DeBoer’s salary for fiscal 2023 (prior to the February 2023 reduction).

(2)Represents an estimate of the bonus severance payable to Dr. DeBoer, which would have included Dr. DeBoer’s actual bonus for fiscal 2023, if earned, and a bonus based on the Company’s performance against performance goals for fiscal 2024, calculated based on Dr. DeBoer’s salary (prior to the February 2023 reduction) and bonus opportunity for fiscal 2023. No amount is included here for any bonus payable for fiscal 2023, because, as discussed above, the EIP for fiscal 2023 was suspended in February 2023, so none of our Named Executive Officers received a bonus for fiscal 2023. The amount included reflects an estimate of the bonus severance payable to Dr. DeBoer for Company performance against performance goals for fiscal 2024, assuming that these goals are met at target levels, which amount is not guaranteed.

(3)Represents a cash payment in an amount estimated to allow Dr. DeBoer to purchase during the Transition Period benefits similar to those received while an employee, without any gross-up for taxes.

(4)Represents the value resulting from an extension of the exercise period for stock options through the Transition Period plus thirty days, or, if shorter, the remaining life of the options, for options that were outstanding as of August 31, 2023. The incremental fair value of each option award is estimated as of August 31, 2023 using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. The expected volatilities utilized are based on implied volatility from traded options on our stock. The expected lives are based on the shorter of the length of the Transition Period plus thirty days or the remaining life of the option. The risk-free interest rates utilized are based on the U.S. Treasury yield as of August 31, 2023.

(5)Represents the value resulting from the additional vesting of restricted shares during the Named Executive Officer’s Transition Period. The amount shown is calculated as the number of additional shares that would vest during the Transition Period multiplied by $69.94, our closing stock price on August 31, 2023.

(6)Represents the value resulting from the vesting of performance based restricted awards during the Named Executive Officer’s Transition Period. The amount shown is calculated as the number of additional shares that would vest during the Transition Period based on actual attainment of performance goals through August 31, 2023, multiplied by $69.94, our closing stock price on August 31, 2023.

The following table sets forth the estimated benefits that would have been payable to Dr. DeBoer upon a termination of employment on August 31, 2023 in connection with a Change in Control occurring on that date, under his amended and restated severance agreement if it had been in effect as of August 31, 2023.

NameSalary(1)Bonus(2)Cash in Lieu of Benefits Payment(3)Value of Options(4)Value of Stock Awards(5)Total
Scott DeBoer$624,750 $624,750 $74,665 $— $16,833,719 $18,157,884 

(1)Represents one year of Dr. DeBoer’s salary for fiscal 2023 (prior to the February 2023 reduction).
72 |20212023 Proxy Statement

Table of Contents

(2)Represents an estimate of the bonus severance payable to Dr. DeBoer, which would have included Dr. DeBoer’s actual bonus for fiscal 2023, if earned, and a bonus based on the Company’s performance against performance goals for fiscal 2024, calculated based on Dr. DeBoer’s salary (prior to the February 2023 reduction) and bonus opportunity for fiscal 2023. No amount is included here for any bonus payable for fiscal 2023, because, as discussed above, the EIP for fiscal 2023 was suspended in February 2023, so none of our Named Executive Officers received a bonus for fiscal 2023. The amount included reflects an estimate of the bonus severance payable to Dr. DeBoer for Company performance against performance goals for fiscal 2024, assuming that these goals are met at target levels, which amount is not guaranteed.

(3)Represents a cash payment in an amount estimated to allow Dr. DeBoer to purchase during the Transition Period benefits similar to those received while an employee, without any gross-up for taxes.

(4)All outstanding options are exercisable on August 31, 2023 and no options are subject to accelerated vesting due to a Change in Control.

(5)Represents the value of all outstanding time-based and performance-based restricted stock awards as of August 31, 2023 that would vest in connection with Dr. DeBoer’s termination of employment in connection with a Change in Control, with any performance conditions deemed achieved at target. The amount shown is calculated as the number of shares upon which restrictions would lapse, multiplied by $69.94, the closing price of our Common Stock on August 31, 2023.
micron-logo-black-rgb-75x21.jpg73


Table of Contents
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION


The following table provides information as of September 2, 2021August 31, 2023 and, in certain cases, the Record Date, November 20, 2023, regarding shares of Common Stock that may be issued pursuant to our equity compensation plans:
(a) Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights(b) Weighted Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights(1)(c) Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column (a))
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Shareholders(2)23,292,704 $28.98 100,552,614 (3)
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Shareholders(4)1,238,362 27.05 3,247,862 (5)
Totals(6)24,531,066 28.32 103,800,476 
(a) Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights(b) Weighted Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights(1)(c) Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column (a))
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Shareholders(2)30,703,596 $28.01 91,802,460 (3)
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Shareholders(4)590,613 25.74 3,253,144 (5)
Totals(6)31,294,209 27.20 95,055,604 


(1)Excludes restricted stock that converts to shares of Common Stockis issued for no consideration and upon vesting, all restrictions lapse without payment of consideration, and excludes ESPP shares for which the exercise price will not be fixed until the purchase date.

(2)Includes shares issuable or available pursuant to our 2004 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2004 Plan”), 2007 Plan, and Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”). The 2004 Plan and the 2007 Plan provide for a maximum term for options and Stock Appreciation Rights (“SARs”) of eight years. The 2004 Plan and 2007 Plan are our only plans that permit granting of awards other than stock options. The 2004 Plan and the 2007 Plan provide that awards other than stock options or SARs reduce the number of available shares under the plan by two shares for each one share covered by the award. In addition, none of our equity plans contain provisions that are commonly known as “liberal share counting provisions” or permit the grant of discounted options or SARs.

(3)If issuing full-value awards, the number of available shares is 61,591,928.52,864,189. The 2004 Plan and 2007 Plan permitpermits granting options and full-value awards. The 2004 Plan expired in January 2023.

(4)Includes shares issuable or available pursuant to our Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan (the “NSOP”). Options granted under the NSOP have terms ranging from six to ten years. The exercise price and the vesting schedule of the options granted under this plan are determined by the administrators of the plan or our Board of Directors.Board. Executive officers and directors do not participate in the NSOP.

(5)None of these shares are available to grant as full-value awards.

(6)The following table contains further information as to awards outstanding and available for issuance under each of our equity plans:plans as of August 31, 2023:
Equity PlanEquity Plan(a)
Number of Securities To Be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights
(b)
Number of Securities Available for Issuance (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column (a))
Equity Plan(a)
Number of Securities To Be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights
(b)
Number of Securities Available for Issuance (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column (a))
Plans Approved by ShareholdersPlans Approved by ShareholdersPlans Approved by Shareholders
2004 Plan2004 Plan6,912,728 (1)1,709,730 2004 Plan2,182,318 (1)— (3)
2007 Plan2007 Plan14,583,231 (2)76,211,642 2007 Plan26,297,521 (2)77,876,542 
ESPPESPP1,796,745 22,631,242 ESPP2,223,757 13,925,918 
Approved Plan TotalApproved Plan Total23,292,704 100,552,614 Approved Plan Total30,703,596 91,802,460 
Plans Not Approved by ShareholdersPlans Not Approved by ShareholdersPlans Not Approved by Shareholders
NSOPNSOP1,238,362 3,247,862 NSOP590,613 3,253,144 
Not Approved Plan TotalNot Approved Plan Total1,238,362 3,247,862 Not Approved Plan Total590,613 3,253,144 
Grand TotalGrand Total24,531,066 103,800,476 Grand Total31,294,209 95,055,604 
74 |2023 Proxy Statement

(1)Includes 5,700,8971,493,668 restricted stock units.

(2)Includes 25,930,961 restricted stock units and excludes 425,4961,158,028 shares of restricted stock.
(2)
(3)2004 Plan expired in January 2023.

The following table contains further information as to awards outstanding and available for issuance under each of our equity plans as of the Record Date, November 20, 2023:

Equity Plan(a)
Number of Securities To Be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights
(b)
Number of Securities Available for Issuance (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column (a))
Plans Approved by Shareholders
2004 Plan1,436,657 (1)— (2)
2007 Plan30,356,089 (3)56,583,034 
ESPP2,178,590 13,971,084 
Approved Plan Total33,971,336 70,554,118 
Plans Not Approved by Shareholders
NSOP509,590 (4)3,253,144 
Not Approved Plan Total509,590 3,253,144 
Grand Total34,480,926 73,807,262 

(1)Includes 13,437,796836,422 restricted stock units and 600,235 stock options with a $32.65 weighted average exercise price and an average remaining contractual life of 1.6 years.

(2)2004 Plan expired in January 2023.

(3)Includes 30,133,147 restricted stock units and 1,153 deferred stock units, and excludes 516,5751,108,073 shares of restricted stock. Also includes 221,789 stock options with a $19.42 weighted average exercise price and an average remaining contractual life of 0.81 year.

(4)The stock options granted under the NSOP have a $26.80 weighted average exercise price and an average remaining contractual life of 1.35 years.


micronnamea.jpg61micron-logo-black-rgb-75x21.jpg75


Table of Contents
PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE

Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based on:(4)
Company Selected Measure: Non-GAAP Net Income (Loss)(7)
(in millions)
Fiscal YearSummary Compensation Table for PEO(1)Compensation Actually Paid to PEO(2)Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-PEO NEOs(3)Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs(2)Company Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”)Peer Group TSR(5)
Net Income (Loss)(6)
(in millions)
2023$25,276,953 $42,535,802 $8,414,800 $13,652,768 $153.10 $164.30 $(5,833)$(4,862)
202228,840,809 13,451,732 10,446,440 4,217,817 124.42 117.53 8,687 9,475 
202125,316,709 68,023,777 7,697,877 19,558,088 159.70 152.68 5,861 6,976 

(1)Our Principal Executive Officer (“PEO”) for each of the fiscal years shown in the table is Sanjay Mehrotra. Amounts reflect the compensation reported in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table for our PEO for the corresponding fiscal year.

(2)Amounts reflect the Compensation Actually Paid (“CAP”) of our PEO, or the average of the CAP of our Non-PEO Named Executive Officers (“Non-PEO NEOs”), for each fiscal year. CAP does not necessarily reflect amounts of compensation actually earned, realized, or received in each fiscal year. Rather, CAP is calculated starting with the amount of compensation reported in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table for our PEO or Non-PEO NEOs, as applicable, for each fiscal year (and averaged for our Non-PEO NEOs), as adjusted in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K. The following adjustments were made to the amount of compensation reported in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table for our PEO and the average of the amounts of compensation reported in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table for our Non-PEO NEOs:
76 |2023 Proxy Statement

Fiscal 2023Fiscal 2022Fiscal 2021
PEOAverage Non-PEO NEOsPEOAverage Non-PEO NEOsPEOAverage Non-PEO NEOs
Summary Compensation Table Total$25,276,953 $8,414,800 $28,840,809 $10,446,440 $25,316,709 $7,697,877 
 - grant date fair value of awards granted in fiscal year(23,750,005)(7,750,012)(23,499,965)(7,771,995)(18,499,995)(5,624,972)
 + fair value of outstanding and unvested awards at fiscal year end that were granted in fiscal year30,945,387 10,097,981 19,866,074 5,492,754 26,043,233 7,918,513 
 +/- change, from prior fiscal year end, in fair value of awards granted in any prior fiscal year outstanding and unvested8,473,475 2,455,380 (9,033,074)(2,077,206)26,370,283 8,310,020 
 + fair value as of vesting date of equity awards granted and vested in the year— — — — — — 
 +/- change, from prior fiscal year end, in fair value at vesting date of any awards granted in any prior fiscal year for which all applicable vesting conditions were satisfied at end of or during fiscal year1,168,408 309,198 (3,060,411)(761,113)8,793,547 1,256,650 
 - fair value at end of prior fiscal year of any awards granted in any prior fiscal year that failed to meet applicable vesting conditions during fiscal year— — — (1,170,912)— — 
 + value of dividends or other earnings paid on stock or option awards not otherwise reflected in fair value or total compensation421,584 125,421 338,299 59,849 — — 
Total Equity Award Adjustments17,258,849 5,237,968 (15,389,077)(6,228,623)42,707,068 11,860,211 
Compensation Actually Paid$42,535,802 $13,652,768 $13,451,732 $4,217,817 $68,023,777 $19,558,088 

(3)Amounts reflect the average of the amounts of compensation reported in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table for our Non-PEO NEOs for the corresponding fiscal year. Our Non-PEO NEOs for each of the fiscal years shown in the Pay Versus Performance Table are:
2023:M. Murphy, M. Bhatia, S. DeBoer, and S. Sadana
2022:M. Murphy, M. Bhatia, M. Bokan, S. DeBoer, S. Sadana, and D. Zinsner (former CFO)
2021:M. Bhatia, S. DeBoer, S. Sadana, and D. Zinsner

(4)The total shareholder return, or TSR, of each of the Company and the Peer Group is calculated by assuming that an investment of $100 is made in our common stock and in the Peer Group, respectively, starting from the market close on Sept. 3, 2020, which is the last trading day before the end of the fiscal year shown. Total shareholder return includes reinvestment of dividends into shares of common stock of the applicable company. Historical stock performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock performance. Disclosure of the TSRs is required by Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K and is not intended to forecast or be indicative of possible future performance of our common stock or the Peer Group.

(5)The Peer Group is based on the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index, one of the indices identified in the Stock Price Performance Graph included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year 2023.

(6)Amounts reflect the Company’s net income as reflected in the audited financial statements for each covered fiscal year.

micron-logo-black-rgb-75x21.jpg77

(7)Amounts reflect the Company’s non-GAAP net income (loss) which is the audited net income (loss) plus adjustments for stock-based compensation, restructure and asset impairments, goodwill impairment, gains and losses from settlements and patent license charges, gains and losses on debt repurchases and conversions, initial impact of inventory accounting policy change to FIFO and change in inventory cost absorption, and estimated tax effects of the above and other tax adjustments.

Relationship between CAP vs. Cumulative TSR of Company and the Peer Group

The following chart illustrates the relationship between CAP for our PEO and the average CAP for our Non-PEO NEOs against our TSR, as well as the relationship between our TSR and the TSR of our peer group:

Picture2.gif

78 |2023 Proxy Statement

Relationship between CAP vs. Net Income (Loss) & Non-GAAP Net Income (Loss)

The following chart illustrates the CAP for our PEO and the average CAP for our Non-PEO NEOs against our net income (loss) and non-GAAP net income (loss):

Picture4.gif

Most Important Performance Measures

The following is an unranked list of the performance measures we consider most important in linking company performance and compensation actually paid to our Named Executive Officers for the most recently completed fiscal year:

Non-GAAP net income (loss)
Non-GAAP operating margin
Relative TSR growth of the Company’s stock price versus the median of the SOX index
DRAM revenue or percentage of revenue from high-growth, stable segments
NAND bits shipped or percentage of bits shipped into the data center segment


micron-logo-black-rgb-75x21.jpg79

PROPOSAL 3 – ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY WITH WHICH SHAREHOLDERS WILL VOTE ON SAY-ON-PAY PROPOSALS IN FUTURE YEARS
PROPOSAL DETAILS

The Dodd-Frank Act provides an opportunity for our shareholders to indicate how frequently we should hold an advisory say-on-pay vote on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers, such as Proposal 2 included on page 27 of this Proxy Statement. By voting on this Proposal 3, shareholders may indicate whether they would prefer an advisory say-on-pay vote on Named Executive Officer compensation once every one, two, or three years. Alternatively, stockholders may abstain from voting on this proposal.

The Board of Directors has determined that holding an advisory say-on-pay vote on Named Executive Officer compensation every year is the most appropriate alternative for us, and therefore the Board recommends that you vote for a one-year interval for future advisory say-on-pay votes.

Shareholders who have concerns about executive compensation during the interval between say-on-pay votes are welcome to bring their specific concerns to the attention of the Board. Please refer to "Executive Sessions and Communications with the Board of Directors" on page 23 of this Proxy Statement for information about communicating with the Board.

A “say on frequency” vote similar to this Proposal 3 will occur at least once every six years.

BOARD RECOMMENDATION

The Board recommends a vote for every “ONE Year" on this proposal.

VOTE REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL

We will treat the option of one year, two years or three years that receives the highest number of votes cast by shareholders as being the frequency for the advisory vote on executive compensation that has been selected by shareholders, even if such frequency does not receive the affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power of our Common Stock present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting. The Board will take the results of the vote into account when deciding when to call for the next advisory vote on Named Executive Officer compensation.

This say-on-frequency vote is required by Section 14A of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78n-1) and is advisory and therefore not binding on us, the Compensation Committee, or the Board and will not be construed as overruling a decision by our Company or our Board or creating or implying any additional fiduciary duty for our Company or our Board. The Board may decide that it is in our and our shareholders’ best interests to hold an advisory vote on executive compensation more or less frequently than the option approved by our shareholders. However, the Board and the Compensation Committee value the opinions of our shareholders and will consider the outcome of the vote when determining the frequency of holding shareholder advisory votes on executive compensation.
80 |2023 Proxy Statement

AUDITCOMMITTEEMATTERS
PROPOSAL 34 – RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP


The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has retained PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm to audit our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ending September 1, 2022.August 29, 2024. PwC has been our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm since fiscal 1985. If1984. Although ratification is not required, the ratificationBoard is submitting a proposal to ratify PwC’s appointment to our shareholders because we value our shareholders’ views and as a matter of good corporate practice. If PwC’s appointment is not approvedratified by a majority of the shares voting thereon,our shareholders, the Audit Committee may reconsider its decision to appoint PwC as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. Even if the appointment is ratified, the Audit Committee may in its discretion select a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the fiscal year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and our shareholders. Representatives of PwC are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting, will have the opportunity to make a statement if they so desire, and are expected to be available to respond following the Annual Meeting to appropriate questions.questions submitted before or during the Annual Meeting.

BOARD RECOMMENDATION

The Board of Directors recommends voting “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.
Fees Paid


Fees charged for services performed by PwC for fiscal 20212023 and 20202022 were as follows:
2021202020232022
(amounts in millions)(amounts in millions)
Audit fees(1)Audit fees(1)$7.8 $7.7 Audit fees(1)$9.4 $8.7 
Audit-related fees(2)Audit-related fees(2)0.1 0.3 Audit-related fees(2)0.1 — 
Tax fees(3)Tax fees(3)2.0 2.2 Tax fees(3)1.6 1.5 
All other fees(4)All other fees(4)— — All other fees(4)— — 
$9.9 $10.2 $11.1 $10.2 


(1)Includes fees related to the audit of our financial statements, fees for services provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings, and fees for attestation services related to our securities offerings and internal control over financial reporting as required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

(2)Primarily reflectsFees not included in audit fees that are billed by the auditor for assurance and related services in connection with government grant certifications.that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit of the financial statements.

(3)Primarily reflects fees for services in connection with tax planning, tax consulting, tax compliance, and tax compliance.audit defense.

(4)Reflects fees for services not included in the categories above, including services relateda subscription to other regulatory reporting requirements.accounting research software.


PRE-APPROVAL POLICY


The Audit Committee Charter provides that the Audit Committee will pre-approve all audit and non-audit services provided to us by the independent auditors, except for such de minimis non-audit services for which the pre-approved requirements are waived in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC. In fiscal 20212023 and 2020,2022, all audit, non-audit, tax services, and all other fees for services provided by PwC were approved by the Audit Committee in advance of services being provided.

62 |2021 Proxy Statement
micron-logo-black-rgb-75x21.jpg81


Table of Contents
BOARD RECOMMENDATION

The Board recommends voting “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.

VOTE REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL

The “FOR” vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of the shares of our Common Stock attending online in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting is required to ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending August 29, 2024.

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS


This report has been prepared by members of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.Board. The Board of Directors determined that each Audit Committee member qualified as an “audit committee financial expert” for purposes of the rules and regulations of the SEC. The Board of Directors also determined that during their period of service on the Audit Committee, each member satisfied the independence requirements of applicable federal laws and the Listing Rules of Nasdaq.


The purpose of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board of Directors in overseeing and monitoring (i) the integrity of our financial statements, (ii) the adequacy of our internal controls and procedures, (iii) the performance of our internal audit function, (iv) the qualifications, performance, and independence of our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, and (v) our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.


The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed our audited financial statements with our management, which has primary responsibility for such financial statements. PwC, our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for fiscal 2021,2023, has expressed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K its opinion as to the conformity of our consolidated financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The Audit Committee has discussed with PwC the matters that are required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.Board (the “PCAOB”) and the SEC. PwC has provided to the Audit Committee the written disclosures and the letter required by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.PCAOB. The Audit Committee and PwC also discussed PwC’s independence, including the non-audit services PwC provided to us as described above, and concluded that PwC was independent for fiscal 2021.2023.


On the basis of the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that they include our audited consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2021,2023, appointed PwC as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the fiscal year ending September 1, 2022,August 29, 2024, and approved and authorized PwC to carry out and perform certain specified non-audit services for us in fiscal 2022.2024.


While the Audit Committee has performed the above functions, management, and not the Audit Committee, has the primary responsibility for (i) preparing our consolidated financial statements and for the reporting process in general and (ii) establishing and maintaining internal controls. Similarly, it is the responsibility of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, and not the Audit Committee, to conduct the audit of our consolidated financial statements and express an opinion as to the conformity of the financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

The Audit Committee
Lynn A. Dugle
Steven J. Gomo
Mary Pat McCarthy (Chair)




micronnamea.jpg6382 |2023 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents
PROPOSAL 5 – SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL – SHAREHOLDER RATIFICATION OF EXCESSIVE TERMINATION PAY
The following shareholder proposal has been submitted to us for action at the Annual Meeting by John Chevedden, 2215 Nelson Avenue, No. 205, Redondo Beach, CA 90278. Mr. Chevedden has submitted documentation indicating that he is the beneficial owner of at least 100 shares of our Common Stock and he intends to continue to hold the requisite amount of shares through the date of the Annual Meeting. In accordance with proxy regulations, the following is the complete text of the proposal, which is reproduced as submitted to us other than minor formatting changes. All statements contained in the shareholder proposal and supporting statement are the sole responsibility of the proponent.

Proposal 5 - Shareholder Ratification of Excessive Termination Pay

Page 81.jpg

Shareholders request that the Board adopt a policy to seek shareholder approval of the top 10 senior managers’ new or renewed pay package that provides for termination payments with an estimated value exceeding 2.99 times the sum of the executive’s base salary plus target short-term bonus.

The Board shall retain the option to seek shareholder approval at an annual meeting after material terms are agreed upon.

Generous performance-based pay can sometimes be justified but shareholder ratification of “golden parachute” severance packages with a total cost exceeding 2.99 times base salary plus target short-term bonus better aligns management pay with shareholder interests.

This proposal is relevant even if there are current golden parachute limits. A limit on golden parachutes is like a speed limit. A speed limit by itself does not guarantee that the speed limit will never be exceeded. Like this proposal the rules associated with a speed limit provide consequences if the limit is exceeded. With this proposal the consequences are a non-binding shareholder vote is required for unreasonably high golden parachutes.

This proposal places no limit on long-term equity pay or any other type pay. This proposal thus has no impact on the ability to attract executive talent or discourage the use of long-term equity pay because it places no limit on golden parachutes. It simply requires that extra large golden parachutes be subject to a non binding shareholder vote at a shareholder meeting already scheduled for other matters.

This proposal is relevant because the annual say on executive pay vote does not have a separate section for approving or rejecting golden parachutes.

This proposal is more important at Micron Technology because executive pay was rejected by 28% of shares at the 2023 annual meeting when a 5% rejection is often the norm at well performing companies.

The topic of this proposal, received between 51% and 65% support at:
FedEx
Spirit AeroSystems
Alaska Air
Fiserv

Please vote yes:
Shareholder Ratification of Excessive Termination Pay – Proposal 5

micron-logo-black-rgb-75x21.jpg83

Table of Contents
THE COMPANY’S OPPOSITION STATEMENT TO PROPOSAL

Page 107.jpg

We already limit cash severance payments for executive officers to be no more than 2.99 times base salary plus target annual bonus opportunity

We have recently adopted an Executive Officer Cash Severance Policy that already addresses the proposal’s request with regard to salary and annual bonus. This policy does not allow the Company to enter into any new employment agreement, severance agreement, or separation agreement with any executive officer – or establish any new severance plan or policy covering any executive officer – that provides for cash severance benefits exceeding 2.99 times the sum of the executive officer’s base salary plus target bonus opportunity, without seeking shareholder ratification of such arrangement. In addition, the Executive Officer Cash Severance Policy provides that any cash payments that may be owed under any existing agreement, plan or policy with an executive officer that was in place prior to adoption of the policy will be reduced as necessary to not exceed the 2.99 times limit unless shareholder ratification is obtained. The Executive Officer Cash Severance Policy is administered by the Compensation Committee, including full authority to interpret and enforce such policy. Our existing severance arrangements are described in detail within the Compensation Discussion & Analysis section entitled “Severance and Change in Control Arrangements.”

The proposal could create a misalignment of executives’ and shareholders’ interests in a potential Change in Control scenario

The Board and Compensation Committee believes that the proposal could create misalignment between our executives and shareholders during a Change in Control transition, leading to increased risk for shareholders.

As described in further detail in the Compensation Discussion & Analysis, in the context of a Change in Control, our equity plans and executive officer severance agreements provide for “double-trigger” vesting provisions that would accelerate the vesting of equity awards if an executive officer were terminated in a qualifying termination of employment (generally, other than for cause or with good reason, as defined) in connection with a Change in Control transaction. Without this incentive, our ability to deliver maximum stockholder value in a Change in Control transaction could be impaired. We may struggle to retain our executive officers, or our executive officers may be unnecessarily distracted by the risk of job loss coupled with a limit on the value realizable from previously granted equity awards. The Board believes that in the context of a Change in Control transaction that it has determined to be in the best interests of our shareholders, our executive officers should be incentivized and motivated to fully focus on the transaction, with the assurance that they will be adequately compensated even if they are terminated
84 |2023 Proxy Statement

Table of Contents
other than for cause or with good reason. We believe this is a responsible pay practice and aligns the interests of our executives with our shareholders.

The proposal could place us at a severe competitive disadvantage by limiting the tools at our disposal to attract and retain highly qualified executives

We operate in a highly competitive market and industry, and in geographic regions that are exceptionally competitive for executive talent. We believe our ability to attract and retain highly qualified executives is key to maximizing the value we create for our shareholders. Many public companies, including our peers, provide double-trigger severance benefits to their executives. In our experience, executive-level candidates expect these protections as part of their compensation packages, and we would jeopardize our ability to attract qualified executives if we were restricted in our ability to offer them. Even if offers of employment contained severance protections that were contingent upon shareholder approval – as would be required by the proposal – they may be viewed as too uncertain and could discourage competitive candidates from accepting our offer. Therefore, the Board believes the proposal would prevent Micron from effectively using equity acceleration as a significant component of severance packages used to attract and retain executives, which in turn could compromise our recruiting efforts and ability to attract top-level talent.

The Board and Compensation Committee believe that the Executive Officer Cash Severance Policy is better suited for the Company to balance shareholder concerns regarding outsized severance payments while remaining competitive for top-level talent, which it believes to be in the best interest of our shareholders.

Shareholders already have opportunities to express their views about our post-termination compensation policies

In addition to the shareholder ratification required under our Executive Officer Cash Severance Policy, we hold an annual say-on-pay advisory vote each year giving our shareholders the ability to vote on our executive compensation program – including our post-termination compensation practices – and shareholders regularly have the opportunity to vote to approve our equity compensation plans. We further supplement these votes with our robust shareholder outreach program, which is outlined in the section of this Proxy Statement entitled “The Board’s Role and Responsibilities – Shareholder Outreach”. Importantly, across the 13 meetings we had with shareholders representing 31% of shares outstanding over the course of fiscal 2023, no shareholder raised the topic of our severance practices as an area of concern. We believe our long track record of shareholder support of our compensation programs since the introduction of say-on-pay advisory votes, together with our demonstrated responsiveness to shareholders when they do raise concerns, as detailed in the Compensation Discussion & Analysis, speaks to the effectiveness of these existing opportunities.

Further, SEC rules also require separate shareholder approval, on an advisory basis, of golden parachute compensation payable to named executive officers in connection with change-in-control transactions. If we were to undergo a change-in-control transaction, shareholders would have the opportunity to vote, on an advisory basis, on any golden parachute arrangements with our executives at that time.

Requiring an intermittent additional shareholder approval of specific elements of compensation, as this proposal requests, is therefore both unnecessary and potentially jeopardizing to our ability to executive on our strategic priorities.

micron-logo-black-rgb-75x21.jpg85

Table of Contents
The proposal would impair the Board’s and the Compensation Committee’s ability to effectively structure compensation programs and arrangements

The Compensation Committee is responsible for assisting the Board in overseeing the compensation of Micron’s executives and other employees, including with respect to severance and termination payments. The Compensation Committee is comprised solely of independent, non-employee directors and regularly consults with its independent compensation consultant, Compensia. The proposed requirement that Micron secure shareholder approval of certain severance arrangements could constrain the Compensation Committee’s ability to exercise its judgment in structuring compensation arrangements in a timely manner and that it believes are in shareholders’ best interests.

The Board believes the Compensation Committee is well qualified to oversee post-termination compensation and should retain the responsibility and flexibility to tailor, assess, and approve compensation structures based on its insights into the Company’s needs and its strategic and operational goals, its access to market information and the independent advice from its compensation consultant.

BOARD RECOMMENDATION

The Board recommends a vote “AGAINST” Proposal 5.

VOTE REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL

The “FOR” vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of the shares of our Common Stock attending online in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting.




86 |2023 Proxy Statement

Table of Contents
PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS


Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management


The following table sets forth security beneficial ownership information of our Common Stock as of November 3, 2023, calculated in accordance with the Record Date,rules of the SEC based on the most current information provided to us by the beneficial owners, available to us from our own records or provided in SEC filings made by the beneficial owners, for (i) persons known by us to own beneficially more than 5% of our Common Stock, (ii) each director, (iii) each Named Executive Officer listed in the “Summary Compensation Table” set forth herein, and (iv) all directors and executive officers as a group:
Name of Beneficial OwnerNumber of
Shares Owned(1)
Right to Acquire(2)Total
Beneficial
Ownership
Percent of
Class(3)
The Vanguard Group, Inc.(4)87,622,245 — 87,622,245 7.8 %
BlackRock, Inc.(5)84,264,547 — 84,264,547 7.5 %
Richard M. Beyer94,921 — 94,921 *
Manish Bhatia310,206 53,317 363,523 *
Scott J. DeBoer201,587 — 201,587 *
Lynn A. Dugle9,327 — 9,327 *
Steven J. Gomo19,100 — 19,100 *
Linnie Haynesworth5,308 — 5,308 *
Mary Pat McCarthy19,100 — 19,100 *
Sanjay Mehrotra(6)911,590 712,284 1,623,874 *
Sumit Sadana (7)200,899 14,031 214,930 *
Robert E. Switz65,103 — 65,103 *
MaryAnn Wright15,009 — 15,009 *
David A. Zinsner(8)223,164 — 223,164 *
All directors and executive officers as a group (16 persons)2,617,073 923,802 3,540,875 *
group. We have based our calculation of the percentage of beneficial ownership on 1,103,445,199 shares of our Common Stock outstanding as of November 3, 2023. Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each beneficial owner listed in the table below is c/o Micron Technology, Inc., 8000 South Federal Way, Boise, Idaho, 83716-9632.

Name of Beneficial OwnerNumber of
Shares Owned(1)
Right to Acquire(2)Total
Beneficial
Ownership
Percent of
Class(3)
The Vanguard Group, Inc.(4)91,568,443 — 91,568,443 8.3 %
BlackRock, Inc.(5)86,062,636 — 86,062,636 7.8 %
Capital Research Global Investors(6)64,749,634 — 64,749,634 5.9 %
Richard M. Beyer99,245 — 99,245 *
Manish Bhatia323,921 53,317 377,238 *
Scott J. DeBoer222,800 8,770 231,570 *
Lynn A. Dugle17,651 — 17,651 *
Steven J. Gomo27,424 — 27,424 *
Linnie M. Haynesworth13,632 — 13,632 *
Mary Pat McCarthy27,424 — 27,424 *
Sanjay Mehrotra(7)1,296,694 468,284 1,764,978 *
Mark J. Murphy215,267 — 215,267 *
Sumit Sadana270,939 14,031 284,970 *
Robert E. Switz73,427 — 73,427 *
MaryAnn Wright23,333 — 23,333 *
All directors and executive officers as a group (15 persons)3,004,054 544,402 3,548,456 *

*    Represents less than 1% of shares outstanding
(1)Includes unvested shares of restricted stock and excludes shares that may be acquired through the exercise of outstanding stock options.

(2)Represents shares that an individual has a right to acquire within 60 days of the Record Date.from November 3, 2023.

(3)For purposes of calculating the Percent of Class, shares that the person or entity had a Right to Acquire are deemed to be outstanding when calculating the Percent of Class of such person or entity.

(4)As of December 31, 2020,Based upon information contained in the Schedule 13G/A filed by The Vanguard Group, Inc. (“Vanguard”) on February 9, 2023, as of December 30, 2022, Vanguard had sole dispositive power as to 82,778,14487,021,583 shares, shared voting power as to 1,796,2381,595,802 shares, and shared dispositive power as to 4,844,1014,546,860 shares. This information was taken from Schedule 13G filed on February 10, 2021. Vanguard’s business address is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355.

(5)AsBased upon information contained in the Schedule 13G/A filed by BlackRock, Inc. (“BlackRock”) on February 3, 2023, as of December 31, 2020,2022, BlackRock Inc. had sole voting power as to 73,893,12378,778,143 shares and sole dispositive power as to 84,264,54786,062,636 shares. This information was taken from Schedule 13G filed on February 5, 2021. BlackRock’s business address is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055.
micron-logo-black-rgb-75x21.jpg87


(6)Based upon information contained in the Schedule 13G filed by Capital Research Global Investors. (“CRGI”) on February 13, 2023, as of December 30, 2022, CRGI had sole voting power as to 64,731,679 shares and sole dispositive power as to 64,749,634 shares. CRGI’s business address is 333 South Hope Street, 55th Fl, Los Angeles, CA 90071. CRGI is a division of Capital Research and Management Company ("CRMC"), as well as its investment management subsidiaries and affiliates Capital Bank and Trust Company, Capital International, Inc., Capital International Limited, Capital International Sarl, Capital International K.K., Capital Group Private Client Services, Inc., and Capital Group Investment Management Private Limited (together with CRMC, the "investment management entities"). CRGI's divisions of each of the investment management entities collectively provide investment management services under the name "Capital Research Global Investors."

(7)Includes 61,854 shares held by the Sangeeta Mehrotra 2020 Grantor Retained Annuity Trust II, 28,50068,322 shares held by the Sangeeta Mehrotra 2021 Grantor Retained Annuity Trust II, and 170,000V, 32,935 shares held by the Sangeeta Mehrotra 20212022 Grantor Retained Annuity Trust V.
(7)Includes 33,000II, and 500,000 shares held by the S. Sadana and S. Sadana Trustee Sadana LivingThe Sangeeta Mehrotra 2023 Grantor Retained Annuity Trust held with spouse.I.
(8)Includes 96,206 shares held by the DZHS Community Property Trust.
64 |2021 Proxy Statement




NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS


Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Shareholder Meeting to Be Held on January 13, 2022.18, 2024. The Proxy Statement and Annual Report on Form 10-K are available at www.proxyvote.com.


As permitted by rules recently adopted by the SEC, we are making our proxy materialmaterials available to our shareholders electronically via the Internet. We have mailed many of our shareholders a Notice containing instructions on how to access this Proxy Statement and our Annual Report on Form 10-K and vote online. If you received a Notice by mail, you will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials in the mail. Instead, the Notice instructs you on how to access and review all of the important information contained in the Proxy Statement and Annual Report.Report on Form 10-K. The Notice also instructs you on how you may submit your voting instructions over the Internet. If you received a Notice by mail and would like to receive a printed copy of our proxy materials, you should follow the instructions for requesting such materials included in the Notice. In addition, shareholders may request to receive proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically by email on an ongoing basis.




INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE OF CERTAIN FINANCIAL INFORMATION


We incorporate by reference in this Proxy Statement the “Equity Plans” note to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2021.2023. The Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 20212023 accompanies this Proxy Statement. Copies of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 20212023 may be obtained without charge by sending a written request to: Micron Technology, Inc., Attn.: Corporate Secretary, 8000 South Federal Way, Boise, Idaho 83716-9632.83716. Our Annual Report on Form 10-K also is available in the “Investor Relations” section of our website at www.micron.com.




HOUSEHOLDING OF PROXY STATEMENTS AND ANNUAL REPORTS


We are allowed and intend to deliver only one copy of the Notice regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials or one set of printed proxy materials (i.e., our 20212023 Annual Report on Form 10-K and Proxy Statement) to multiple registered shareholders sharing an address who have received prior notice of our intent to deliver only one such notice or set of materials, so long as we have not received contrary instructions from such shareholders. This practice is commonly referred to as “householding.” Householding reduces the volume of duplicate information received at your household and our costs of preparing and mailing duplicate materials.


88 |2023 Proxy Statement

Table of Contents
If you share an address with other registered shareholders and your household receives one copy of the Notice of Internet availability or of this Proxy Statement and 2021 Annual Report on Form 10-Kthe proxy materials and you decide you want a separate copy of this Proxy Statement and 2021 Annual Report on Form 10-K through the date of the Annual Meeting, we will promptly deliver your separate copy if you contact us at Micron Technology, Inc., Attn.: Corporate Secretary, 8000 South Federal Way, Boise, Idaho 83716-9632 or corporatesecretary@micron.com or (208) 368-4000. Additionally, for registered shareholders to resume the mailing of individual copies of future annual reports, proxy statements, proxy statements combined with a prospectus, and information statements to a particular shareholder, you may contact EQ Shareowner Services, Attn.: Householding, P.O. Box 64854, St. Paul, Minnesota 55164-0874 and your request will be effective within 30 days after receipt. After the Annual Meeting, you may request householding of these documents, including notices, by providing EQ Shareowner Services at the address provided directly above with a written request to eliminate multiple mailings. The written request must include names and account numbers of all shareholders consenting to householding for a given address and must be signed by those shareholders.


Additionally, we have been notified that certain banks, brokers, and other nominees will household our annual reports and proxy statements for shareholders who hold in street names and have consented to householding. In this case, you may request an individual copy of this Proxy Statement and 2021 Annual Report on Form 10-Kthe proxy materials by contacting your bank, broker, or other nominee.




micronnamea.jpg65


CAUTIONARY NOTE ON FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS


This Proxy Statement contains forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Such forward-looking statements may be identified by words such as “anticipate,” “expect,” “intend,” “pledge,” “committed,” “plans,” “opportunities,” “future,” “believe,” “target,” “on track,” “estimate,” “continue,” “likely,” “may,” “will,” “would,” “should,” “could,” and variations of such words and similar expressions. However, the absence of these words or similar expressions does not mean that a statement is not forward-looking. Specific forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements such as those made regarding our plans for expected capital expenditures; growthproduction ramp of the amount of our quarterly dividend;certain products; our expected results for fiscal 2022;2024; our DEI, sustainability and compensation plans, expectations and commitments; our Sustainability commitments, goals, and expected improvements; the outlook for our industry; our restructuring plans and expected savings therefrom; expected market demand for our products; the timing for construction and ramping of production for new memory manufacturing fabs in the United States; our plans for our investments and storage market; expected timingplanned expansions in our fabs; the receipt of government grants and cost reductions from, new technology nodes;investment tax credits; market conditions and profitability in our industry; spending in 2024, the sufficiency of our cash and investments; and estimated payments to our Named Executive Officers upon termination or changeChange in control. ActualControl. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual events or results couldto differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements.materially. Please refer to the documents we file from time to time with the SEC, specificallyincluding our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and any subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q.our annual report provided as part of the proxy materials. These documents contain and identify important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements (see the “Risk Factors” section in our Form 10-K and any subsequent Form 10-Q). The forward-looking statements are based on information available to us as of the date hereof and are based on management’s current views and assumptions and should not be relied upon as representing our views as of any subsequent date.statements. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance, or achievements. We do not undertakeare under no duty to update any obligation to release publicly any revisions to theseof the forward-looking statements, to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, unlessexcept as required by applicable law requires us to do so.law.




DEADLINE FOR RECEIPT OF SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR FISCAL 20222024 ANNUAL MEETING


ProposalsShareholders may present proper proposals for inclusion in our proxy statement and for consideration at the next annual meeting of shareholders by submitting their proposals in writing to our shareholders which are intendedCorporate Secretary in a timely manner. For a shareholder proposal to be presented atconsidered for inclusion in our Fiscal 2022 Annual Meetingproxy statement for our fiscal 2024 annual meeting of Shareholders, including proposals submitted pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 14a-8 as well as for director nominees,shareholders, our Corporate Secretary must be received by usreceive the written proposal at our principal executive offices located at 8000 South Federal Way, Boise, Idaho 83716-9632, Attn.:Attention: Corporate Secretary, no later than August 4, 2022,1, 2024. In addition, such shareholders proposals must comply with the other requirements of Rule 14a-8 regarding the inclusion of stockholder proposals in Company-sponsored proxy materials. Submission of a proposal before the deadline does not guarantee its inclusion in our proxy materials.

Under our Bylaws, director nominations and other business may be brought before an annual meeting of shareholders only by or at the direction of the Board or by a shareholder entitled to vote who has submitted a proposal in accordance with the requirements of our Bylaws. To nominate a candidate or submit a proposal for
micron-logo-black-rgb-75x21.jpg89

Table of Contents
consideration at our fiscal 2024 annual meeting pursuant to our advance notice bylaw provisions, shareholders must also bedeliver or mail their nomination submission or other stockholder notice of a proposal so that it is received by our Corporate Secretary, at the address above no later than August 1, 2024. In addition to the requirements set forth in complianceour Bylaws, to comply with Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act, shareholders must provide notice of intent to solicit proxies in support of director nominees (other than the Company’s nominees) for the fiscal 2024 annual meeting when providing notice of nomination to the Company no later than the dates set forth above. Please note that the notice requirement under Rule 14a-19 is in addition to the applicable notice requirements in our Restated Certificate of Incorporation,Bylaws.

Shareholders wishing to nominate a director candidate through our Amended and Restated Bylaws, and applicable laws and regulationsproxy access Bylaw provisions for inclusion in order to be included in theour proxy statement must comply with the eligibility, procedural, and disclosure requirements set forth in our Bylaws. To be timely for our fiscal 2024 annual meeting of shareholders, our Corporate Secretary must receive a shareholder’s notice of proxy card relating to that meeting. Proposals which are received afteraccess nomination at our principal executive offices, not earlier than July 2, 2024 or later than August 4, 2022, will be untimely and will not be considered at the meeting.1, 2024.


December 2, 2021November 29, 2023
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS




66 90 |20212023 Proxy Statement



micronballot_pagex1a.jpgMicron’s Global Presence

micron-map-gradient-2-white-rgb-v04.jpg
Micron’s global presence map highlights locations that include our manufacturing sites, centers of excellence, customer labs, and large offices.
Not all Micron locations are represented on this map.

micron-4.0-vmv-ppt-slide (6.21.23).jpg



micronballot_pagex2a.jpg





proxy-mapxvmvxdigitalxfinala.jpgBack Cover.jpg





fnc-000900xfinancialsxproxc.jpgMICRON TECHNOLOGY Proxy Card pg 1.jpg




MICRON TECHNOLOGY Proxy Card pg 2.jpg